http://gosoftware.org/fmod_software/
Give this URL a try
From: Andrew Simpson
To: opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com
Sent: Sat, April 17, 2010 5:32:50 PM
Subject: [opensource-dev] Fmod 3.74?
hey does anyone know where is fmod API 3.75 i cant find from
http://
Andrew Simpson wrote:
> hey does anyone know where is fmod API 3.75 i cant find from
> http://www.fmod.org/index.php/download
> now it all over version 4
> when sl wiki say download fmod API 3.75 what going to do?
> ___
> Policies and (un)subscribe inf
hey does anyone know where is fmod API 3.75 i cant find from
http://www.fmod.org/index.php/download
now it all over version 4
when sl wiki say download fmod API 3.75 what going to do?
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wi
A random thought from a non-contributor after reviewing the wiki a bit...
In the wiki page the biggest issue described for RabbitMQ was the idea that
it could not easily be partitioned without each node having a complete
description of every queue.
I'm wondering if it would be feasible to separat
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 12:02:57AM -0700, Erik Anderson wrote:
> Hey, if you're looking for a review of message queueing agents, I ran across
> an
> SL review of MQs a while back when trying to choose one for our company's back
> end COMET server. It had value in my research and may have for some
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Lance Corrimal
wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 14. April 2010 20:49:59 schrieb Joe Linden:
>
>> **we've had a lot of internal debate around cost/benefit of OS **... and
>> we're fully committed to redoubling our commitment to make this a
>> successful program*."
>
>
> then..
It isn't just the messages that need to scale. Messaging is probably the
bottom of the list of use-cases for groups in practice. It's the bit
where most of the actual *problems* show up, but it isn't actually as
important a part of group scaling as the rest of the group functions.
On 17/04/2010 11
Scaling of group messages is simple however.
With one server per group you get a long way.
Lets say, 2000 connections per server on average.
Usually about 1/10th of the users is online, so
you can keep adding groups to a server until
the total number of group members is around 20,000.
Then you add
Works for me on "Second Life 2.0.0 (203055) Mar 30 2010 08:11:18 (Second
Life Developer)", but with a single dash. I also remember having trouble
with localhost and I had to specify 127.0.0.1 instead
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 2:33 AM, Latif Khalifa wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm having problems specifyin
Hello,
I'm having problems specifying alternative login url with --loginuri
command line option. It work up to "final" viewer2 release, through
all the betas, but it seem to be not working in the final release, and
in the later snowglobe builds.
Latif
Hey, if you're looking for a review of message queueing agents, I ran across
an SL review of MQs a while back when trying to choose one for our company's
back end COMET server. It had value in my research and may have for someone
trying to come up with chat alternatives...
http://wiki.secondlife.
11 matches
Mail list logo
