Thanks Merov! That cleared up a lot of confusion.
Could you please check the word "*and*" in your following paragraph?
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote:
>
> - Distributing Binaries: That indeed creates a TPV and TPV Policy will
> apply if the viewer plans to connec
Philippe (Merov) Bossut wrote:
>
> - Commit of SNOW-375 in Snowglobe: This is a big patch and, since we
> don't have a CLA for Dzonatas on file, it can't be integrated as long
> as that's not cleared. Note that, to the best of my knowledge, such
> CLA are asked for contributions to most FLOSS pr
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Morgaine wrote:
> While that may be his intention, you can't make a new Snowglobe by placing
> a patch in Jira, applying the patch to Snowglobe sources, and then
> distributing the resulting viewer as if it were a new version of Snowglobe,
> exempt from being
Dzonatas, I still want to know what your TPV is called, to assist our
discussion.
You are distributing a TPV made by patching Snowglobe sources with the
SNOW-375 patch. The archive you are distributing unpacks as
"Snowglobe-i686-1.4.0.0", but I rather doubt that you have permission to be
distribu
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Tayra Dagostino
wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 06:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
> Nicky Perian wrote:
>
> > Same issue as Latif.
> >
> > On windows it fails with:
> >
> > CMake Error at media_plugins/webkit/CMakeLists.txt:17 (include):
> > include could not find load file:
Hi all,
Yes, there were a bunch of missed added files and other issues that actually
made the repository not complete, and therefore, not buildable. I did a
serie of commits today to fix that. I've been able to build on Mac and
Windows at least.
Now, I'm still working on fixing the opensrc-build.
*waves*
What changed in the login response request/processing code from 1.23 ->
Snowglobe -> 2.0?
I've been trying to figure out why I can connect to the beta grid, but not
the main grid half the time with Snowglobe / 2.0, but can effortlessly with
1.23.
Alt logs on fine to both grids under any
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 15:52:21 -0400
Robert Martin wrote:
> 1 the BiB is htmlkit/safari correct?
webkit
> 2 how could a person install plugins to the BiB?
not so sure... but try to create a php file ad hoc and see it inside
viewer browser, so u can see where is default plugin directory (never
tri
1 - I'm not 100% sure but I believe that the built in browser in 2.0 uses
QtWebKit.
2 - Plugins would be handled at a higher level than just the webkit engine
and there isn't currently a way to create or install them. I've never heard
of a generic "webkit" plugin. They're specific to your browser
Some of the noise surrounding 2.0 concerns the lack of adblocking and
other privacy enhancing things that can be used with the browser.
so if somebody could point me to the answers for the following
questions that would be "spiffy"
1 the BiB is htmlkit/safari correct?
2 how could a person install
Please note from the jira: "The purpose of this jira is to help further
the process to bring the patch to release quality." At that time, it may
be desirable to commit it to Snowglobe. Until then, the patch is offered
for community development (not as some conspiracy theory to bypass TPV).
If y
+1
You made my day
> That sounds pretty interesting, Dzonatas.
>
> What is your viewer called, this TPV derived from Snowglobe
> with an extra patch?
>
> Morgaine.
___
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secon
While that may be his intention, you can't make a new Snowglobe by placing a
patch in Jira, applying the patch to Snowglobe sources, and then
distributing the resulting viewer as if it were a new version of Snowglobe,
exempt from being a TPV.
If that were possible then everyone would do likewise w
That's correct.
Michael Dickson wrote:
> Actually his intention could be to contribute the patches *to* snowglobe
> in which case it's not a new TPV and a very reasonable example of
> cooperation with a company sponsored open source project.
>
> That's actually very likely his intention since the
Actually his intention could be to contribute the patches *to* snowglobe
in which case it's not a new TPV and a very reasonable example of
cooperation with a company sponsored open source project.
That's actually very likely his intention since the patches *ARE*
SNOW-375 and not MY_TPV-375 or some
Nope, client-side scripting and an HTTP/REST server are not in Snowglobe.
Your patch SNOW-375 when applied to Snowglobe sources created a derived work
from Snowglobe. The derived viewer is clearly a TPV.
This is why I am asking you what this new TPV is called, since it is not
Snowglobe but only b
Has client-side scripting and an HTTP/REST server been offered in
Snowglobe before patch SNOW-375? I'm not sure how you are able to
determine such features as "derived" from Snowglobe.
The SNOW-375 patch
Morgaine wrote:
> That sounds pretty interesting, Dzonatas.
>
> What is your viewer called,
17 matches
Mail list logo
