Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-13 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Vallish Vaidyeshwara wrote: > NFS Version 3 mounts negotiate a security mode when > the server returns an array of security modes. The > client picks the first mode in the array that is > supported on the client. In negotiations, an NFS >

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-13 Thread Vallish Vaidyeshwara
Andrew Gallatin wrote: OK, I just got the mail. The bug is 6828396 Its odd that the Solaris bug reporter doesn't actually assign a number until later. Other bug reporters (Apple's, for example) give you a number as soon as you hit "submit". Does a human actually look at the bug before it i

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Andrew Gallatin wrote: > OK, I just got the mail. The bug is 6828396 > > Its odd that the Solaris bug reporter doesn't actually assign a number until > later. Other bug reporters (Apple's, for example) give you a number as soon > as you hit "submit". Does a human actually look at the bug bef

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Casper . Dik
>OK, I just got the mail. The bug is 6828396 > >Its odd that the Solaris bug reporter doesn't actually assign a number until >later. Other bug reporters (Apple's, for example) give you a number as soon >as you hit "submit". Does a human actually look at the bug before it is given >a number?

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Gallatin
OK, I just got the mail. The bug is 6828396 Its odd that the Solaris bug reporter doesn't actually assign a number until later. Other bug reporters (Apple's, for example) give you a number as soon as you hit "submit". Does a human actually look at the bug before it is given a number? Drew

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Paul Durrant
Andrew Gallatin wrote: Thanks for confirming that it is not just me. I've filed a bug, just in case nobody else has (don't know the bug id yet). Cool. I had a look round on bugster but I couldn't find anything. Paul -- === Paul Durrant http://www.linkedin.c

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Thanks for confirming that it is not just me. I've filed a bug, just in case nobody else has (don't know the bug id yet). Regards, Drew -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Paul Durrant
Andrew Gallatin wrote: I recently BFU'd a system in my home lab from snv_106 to snv_111, and now I cannot access things as a user from my Linux NFS server using NFSv3 because Solaris NFS is sending my uid as 65534. The only workaround I've been able to find is to use an NFSv2 mount. Drew, I

[osol-discuss] snv_111 problem with Linux NFSv3 server

2009-04-09 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Hi, I recently BFU'd a system in my home lab from snv_106 to snv_111, and now I cannot access things as a user from my Linux NFS server using NFSv3 because Solaris NFS is sending my uid as 65534. The only workaround I've been able to find is to use an NFSv2 mount. The same machine worked fine for