On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:56 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Ive read from several places (developers), that OpenBSD is secure only
> because every service is shut down. When you start to enable them, OpenBSD
> is as secure/unsecure as any other other Unix.
>
There's some truth to that, in that they on
Ive read from several places (developers), that OpenBSD is secure only because
every service is shut down. When you start to enable them, OpenBSD is as
secure/unsecure as any other other Unix.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
> I think that Solaris has a lot of unique and useful security features
> including RBAC, zones, Trusted Solaris Extensions, and much more
> useful audit features than Linux provides. I think RBAC/pfexec is a
> lot more secure than using sudo or PolicyKit, for example.
Thanks Brian. I knew that I
Dmitry:
Not count that much on my humble opinion, but I think OpenSolaris
is appropriately secure. If you need a paranoid level of security,
take a look at OpenBSD. I would not compare anything with abstract
Linux, there are too many distributions of it, varying in security
level. For me, OpenS
Not count that much on my humble opinion, but I think OpenSolaris is
appropriately secure. If you need a paranoid level of security, take a look at
OpenBSD. I would not compare anything with abstract Linux, there are too many
distributions of it, varying in security level. For me, OpenSUSE is su
Hi
Could you explain to me about opensolaris security vs linux/freebsd?
Thank you
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
