On 12/27/10 04:01, Joerg Schilling wrote:
A compay that first starts a big effort in making something OpenSource and
some time later dies everything to close the source again does not look like a
trustworthy partner for collaboration.
I think this action will lead many popular opensource
"Nikola M." wrote:
> Contributions to Illumos, etc, those that are done in CDDL - but
> contributor did not sign contract with Oracle about they owning the
> code, stops Oracle from including it in closed source product without
> releasing it, but allows them to make product with released code (o
Edward Martinez wrote:
> Now I think when it comes to opensource, Oracle only tries to
> exploit it, by finding ways where they can make money of it. with that
> in mind,
You can make money out of OSS.
> i think releasing solaris code is the last thing oracle has in
> mind,
On 12/26/10 11:36, Nikola M. wrote:
I concur that Illumos/OI development is only possible to grow if noone
is waiting on anything from Oracle.
Hi,
I think we should stick to this mindset to strengthen illumos and
illumos based distros, so those projects can be self propelled, and not
e
On 12/26/10 07:46 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> Now I think when it comes to opensource, Oracle only tries to
> exploit it, by finding ways where they can make money of it. with
> that in mind,
There is nothing wrong in fully exploiting open source to make money ,
that is great actually :)
>
On 12/25/10 20:13, Nikola M. wrote:
On 12/13/10 11:36 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
And that shortly might be called Illumos and OpenIndiana distribution. :)
Great for new Oracle customers, without usage restrictions and great for
contributing,
- exactly what OpenSolaris binary distribution was g
>That is, only providing that Oracle is ready to release ON consolidation
code, to its customers and followers, at the times for release and to
use it as strong major selling point.
You didn't get the memo looks like oracle is commercializing its own zfs and
not interested in any non-profit found
On 12/13/10 11:36 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>> probably, after full solaris 11 is out and oracle
>> makes millions of it first
>> since they are develop it. it will be like when
>> oracle needs to wait for red hat to release the
>> enterprise sources to develop oracle linux.
>> so we need the w
> > Will ORACLE keep its promise to publish the b151
> > codes on the public onnv-gate now after SX11 b151
> is
> > released?
>
> probably, after full solaris 11 is out and oracle
> makes millions of it first
> since they are develop it. it will be like when
> oracle needs to wait for red hat to
> Will ORACLE keep its promise to publish the b151
> codes on the public onnv-gate now after SX11 b151 is
> released?
probably, after full solaris 11 is out and oracle makes millions of it first
since they are develop it. it will be like when oracle needs to wait for red
hat to release the ente
First ORACLE will leverage all benefits from b151 since it spent money on
development.
Uros
> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:47:49 -0800
> From: tp...@lbl.gov
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: [osol-discuss] onnv-gate and b151
>
> Will ORACLE keep its prom
Will ORACLE keep its promise to publish the b151 codes on the public onnv-gate
now after SX11 b151 is released?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
12 matches
Mail list logo
