Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-29 Thread Dennis Clarke
> > > > --- On Thu, 5/28/09, stephen bond wrote: > >> From: stephen bond >> Subject: [osol-discuss] new release >> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org >> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:08 AM >> Does anybody know when the new >> rel

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-29 Thread ken mays
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, stephen bond wrote: > From: stephen bond > Subject: [osol-discuss] new release > To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org > Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:08 AM > Does anybody know when the new > release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be rel

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-29 Thread Glynn Foster
On 28/05/2009, at 8:56 AM, Sean Sprague wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: stephen bond wrote: Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be released? There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is scheduled for release next week at the Com

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread Sean Sprague
Alan Coopersmith wrote: stephen bond wrote: Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be released? There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is scheduled for release next week at the CommunityOne conference. And at the same ti

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread Tim Evans
Are you sure you're not mixing your question with Solaris 10 5/09? It was in fact released this month. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread Alan Coopersmith
stephen bond wrote: > Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be > released? There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is scheduled for release next week at the CommunityOne conference. -- -Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread Jason King
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jürgen Keil wrote: >> Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for >> 5/2009 will actually be released? > > I don't know; but the name was changed to opensolaris 2009.06 > so my guess is that it will be released at the end of june. Actually everyone I've t

Re: [osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread Jürgen Keil
> Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for > 5/2009 will actually be released? I don't know; but the name was changed to opensolaris 2009.06 so my guess is that it will be released at the end of june. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] new release

2009-05-28 Thread stephen bond
Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be released? thank you stephen -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] New Release: Bugs.opensolaris.org

2007-02-27 Thread Linda Bernal
OpenSolaris Community, I would like to introduce to you phase two of (b.o.o) bugs.opensolaris.org. There were lots of requests submitted and while we appreciate your feedback not all requests were incorporated in this release. Please take a look at what changes did make it in: Let's st

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-12-05 Thread Valerie Anne Bubb
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Richard Lowe wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Linda Bernal wrote: First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please kno

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-30 Thread Dick Davies
On 30/11/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: IMO email would be much better - it allows an easy access, more or less real-time notification and it would not "tax" the bug database by zillions of RSS clients which are polling the RSS feed every minute for updates (guess why bugzilla has n

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 20:16]: > Stephen Hahn wrote: > > * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]: > >> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take > >> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community > >> can make real use of ? With all due respec

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Glynn Foster
Hi, Stephen Hahn wrote: > * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]: >> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take >> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community >> can make real use of ? With all due respect and appreciation >> of Linda's and others work I think tha

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Which means I have to start Thunderbird just to read RSS ? Fun... ;-( > > It wouldn't be that hard to write a script to do it - an overcomplicated > example of one that already does so is in > /usr/X11/lib/xscreensaver/bin/xscreensaver-text Yes...

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Roland Mainz wrote: Which means I have to start Thunderbird just to read RSS ? Fun... ;-( It wouldn't be that hard to write a script to do it - an overcomplicated example of one that already does so is in /usr/X11/lib/xscreensaver/bin/xscreensaver-text For example, run: /usr/X11/lib/xscreensa

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Derek Cicero
Dennis Clarke wrote: Hello, First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in t

Re: EMails clearly visiable / was: Re: [website-discuss] Re:[osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Rich Teer wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote: > > > I think the injected inert tags idea would work, since it preserves > > Jim's plea for pasteability. (, not , yes?) I'll update > > John's bug. > > FWIW, I use the following bit of JavaScript code in my web pages to make

Re: EMails clearly visiable / was: Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Rich Teer
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote: > I think the injected inert tags idea would work, since it preserves > Jim's plea for pasteability. (, not , yes?) I'll update > John's bug. FWIW, I use the following bit of JavaScript code in my web pages to make email address "print" OK on scree

Re: EMails clearly visiable / was: Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Stephen Hahn wrote: > > * Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 14:28]: > > Dan Price wrote: > > [snp] > > > Linda and team, > > > > > > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the > > > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address > > > is cle

Re: EMails clearly visiable / was: Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 14:28]: > Dan Price wrote: > [snp] > > Linda and team, > > > > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the > > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address > > is clearly visible for the spambots of the w

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread James Carlson
Dan Price writes: > > Switching it to " at dot " would be fine, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] would most definitely not be. > > > > Please make clear that this information should not once again be > > entirely hidden or useless. > > Yes, agreed, we should try to foil the spambots, not make > getting th

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:04:14PM -0800, Dan Price wrote: > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address > is clearly visible for the spambots of the world to harvest. I'd just filed: 6498800 b.o.o reve

EMails clearly visiable / was: Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Dan Price wrote: [snp] > Linda and team, > > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address > is clearly visible for the spambots of the world to harvest. Mhhh, I like the idea to have the emails visible, b

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Richard Lowe
Roland Mainz wrote: Richard Lowe wrote: Roland Mainz wrote: Linda Bernal wrote: * Add "Commit to fix" and "Introduced_in_release" fields on bug view page What about an "add comment" field if the bug owner allows this for the OpenSolaris account of the current user ? I don't think it s

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Richard Lowe wrote: > Roland Mainz wrote: > > Linda Bernal wrote: > >> First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with > >> this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little > >> longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know > >

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Bill Sommerfeld
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:58 -0500, Richard Lowe wrote: > Any CR maybe relevant, be it old, closed, or whatever else. A method > to refine a search to within a date range would be good, hiding all CRs > older than a set date would be terrible. Absolutely; bugs must never be hidden simply because

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Dan Price
On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 04:06PM, Richard Lowe wrote: > Dan Price wrote: > >On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote: > >>On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]: > On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Richard Lowe
Dan Price wrote: On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote: On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]: On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * RSS feed function. that's cool Yeah, but where is it ?

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Dan Price
On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote: > On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]: > >> On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> * RSS feed function. > >> > > >> > that's cool > >> > >> Yeah,

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Richard Lowe
Roland Mainz wrote: Linda Bernal wrote: First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know that we intend to keep making progress on

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]: > Do we have any estimation on how long will it take > to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community > can make real use of ? With all due respect and appreciation > of Linda's and others work I think that resources are poured > in wro

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Roland Mainz
Linda Bernal wrote: > First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with > this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little > longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know > that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the f

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]: > On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * RSS feed function. > > > > that's cool > > Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it... It's not there yet--Linda's lis

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Stephen Hahn
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]: > On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> * RSS feed function. > > > > that's cool > > Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it... It's not there yet--Linda's list was outlining our thoughts for the next batch of c

Re: [website-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Cyril Plisko
On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * RSS feed function. that's cool Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it... -- Regards, Cyril ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Dennis Clarke
> Hello, > > > First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with > this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little > longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know > that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the future.

[osol-discuss] New Release of B.O.O!

2006-11-29 Thread Linda Bernal
Hello, First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the future. For th