>
>
>
> --- On Thu, 5/28/09, stephen bond wrote:
>
>> From: stephen bond
>> Subject: [osol-discuss] new release
>> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:08 AM
>> Does anybody know when the new
>> rel
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, stephen bond wrote:
> From: stephen bond
> Subject: [osol-discuss] new release
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 10:08 AM
> Does anybody know when the new
> release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be rel
On 28/05/2009, at 8:56 AM, Sean Sprague wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
stephen bond wrote:
Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will
actually be released?
There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is
scheduled for release next week at the Com
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
stephen bond wrote:
Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be
released?
There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is
scheduled for release next week at the CommunityOne conference.
And at the same ti
Are you sure you're not mixing your question with Solaris 10 5/09? It was in
fact released this month.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
stephen bond wrote:
> Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be
> released?
There is no release scheduled for 5/2009. The 2009.06 release is
scheduled for release next week at the CommunityOne conference.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
>> Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for
>> 5/2009 will actually be released?
>
> I don't know; but the name was changed to opensolaris 2009.06
> so my guess is that it will be released at the end of june.
Actually everyone I've t
> Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for
> 5/2009 will actually be released?
I don't know; but the name was changed to opensolaris 2009.06
so my guess is that it will be released at the end of june.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Does anybody know when the new release scheduled for 5/2009 will actually be
released?
thank you
stephen
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
OpenSolaris Community,
I would like to introduce to you phase two of (b.o.o)
bugs.opensolaris.org. There were lots of requests submitted and while
we appreciate your feedback not all requests were incorporated in this
release. Please take a look at what changes did make it in:
Let's st
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Richard Lowe wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Linda Bernal wrote:
First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please kno
On 30/11/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO email would be much better - it allows an easy access, more or less
real-time notification and it would not "tax" the bug database by
zillions of RSS clients which are polling the RSS feed every minute for
updates (guess why bugzilla has n
* Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 20:16]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]:
> >> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take
> >> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community
> >> can make real use of ? With all due respec
Hi,
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]:
>> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take
>> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community
>> can make real use of ? With all due respect and appreciation
>> of Linda's and others work I think tha
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Which means I have to start Thunderbird just to read RSS ? Fun... ;-(
>
> It wouldn't be that hard to write a script to do it - an overcomplicated
> example of one that already does so is in
> /usr/X11/lib/xscreensaver/bin/xscreensaver-text
Yes...
Roland Mainz wrote:
Which means I have to start Thunderbird just to read RSS ? Fun... ;-(
It wouldn't be that hard to write a script to do it - an overcomplicated
example of one that already does so is in
/usr/X11/lib/xscreensaver/bin/xscreensaver-text
For example, run:
/usr/X11/lib/xscreensa
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Hello,
First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in t
Rich Teer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> > I think the injected inert tags idea would work, since it preserves
> > Jim's plea for pasteability. (, not , yes?) I'll update
> > John's bug.
>
> FWIW, I use the following bit of JavaScript code in my web pages to make
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> I think the injected inert tags idea would work, since it preserves
> Jim's plea for pasteability. (, not , yes?) I'll update
> John's bug.
FWIW, I use the following bit of JavaScript code in my web pages to make
email address "print" OK on scree
Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> * Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 14:28]:
> > Dan Price wrote:
> > [snp]
> > > Linda and team,
> > >
> > > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the
> > > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address
> > > is cle
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 14:28]:
> Dan Price wrote:
> [snp]
> > Linda and team,
> >
> > It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the
> > spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address
> > is clearly visible for the spambots of the w
Dan Price writes:
> > Switching it to " at dot " would be fine,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] would most definitely not be.
> >
> > Please make clear that this information should not once again be
> > entirely hidden or useless.
>
> Yes, agreed, we should try to foil the spambots, not make
> getting th
On Wed, Nov 29, 2006 at 01:04:14PM -0800, Dan Price wrote:
> It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the
> spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address
> is clearly visible for the spambots of the world to harvest.
I'd just filed:
6498800 b.o.o reve
Dan Price wrote:
[snp]
> Linda and team,
>
> It's REALLY REALLY upsetting that no attempt is made to foil the
> spambots. For example, in the above link, Stephen's sun email address
> is clearly visible for the spambots of the world to harvest.
Mhhh, I like the idea to have the emails visible, b
Roland Mainz wrote:
Richard Lowe wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
Linda Bernal wrote:
* Add "Commit to fix" and "Introduced_in_release" fields on bug
view page
What about an "add comment" field if the bug owner allows this for the
OpenSolaris account of the current user ?
I don't think it s
Richard Lowe wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Linda Bernal wrote:
> >> First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
> >> this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
> >> longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
> >
On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 15:58 -0500, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Any CR maybe relevant, be it old, closed, or whatever else. A method
> to refine a search to within a date range would be good, hiding all CRs
> older than a set date would be terrible.
Absolutely; bugs must never be hidden simply because
On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 04:06PM, Richard Lowe wrote:
> Dan Price wrote:
> >On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> >>On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]:
> On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Dan Price wrote:
On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]:
On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* RSS feed function.
that's cool
Yeah, but where is it ?
On Wed 29 Nov 2006 at 10:35PM, Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]:
> >> On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> * RSS feed function.
> >> >
> >> > that's cool
> >>
> >> Yeah,
Roland Mainz wrote:
Linda Bernal wrote:
First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
that we intend to keep making progress on
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 12:35]:
> Do we have any estimation on how long will it take
> to have a normal b.o.o ? I mean the one that community
> can make real use of ? With all due respect and appreciation
> of Linda's and others work I think that resources are poured
> in wro
Linda Bernal wrote:
> First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
> this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
> longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
> that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the f
On 11/29/06, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]:
> On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> * RSS feed function.
> >
> > that's cool
>
> Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it...
It's not there yet--Linda's lis
* Cyril Plisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-29 11:59]:
> On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> * RSS feed function.
> >
> > that's cool
>
> Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it...
It's not there yet--Linda's list was outlining our thoughts for the
next batch of c
On 11/29/06, Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * RSS feed function.
that's cool
Yeah, but where is it ? I cannot find it...
--
Regards,
Cyril
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Hello,
>
>
> First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
> this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
> longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
> that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the future.
Hello,
First off, I would like to thank the community for being so patient with
this release of bugs.opensolaris.org. This project has taken a little
longer than anticipated due to some unforeseen obstacles. Please know
that we intend to keep making progress on b.o.o in the future.
For th
38 matches
Mail list logo