On 11/14/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Steinke writes:
> I can't help but think that the MS-Novell deal was the
> inspiration for this going into completion; the final straw, so
What utter rubbish!
I believe so, but I am surprised to read this:
[quote]
And in closi
Chris Steinke writes:
> Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS to make
> OpenSolaris less 'free' or 'open'?
Good grief. We'd muck with our own future for a few one-time trinkets
from MS? After spending all this money and time to open up the code?
Give me a break.
I think a person
>And it just gets worse from there. Is Sun behind the Trilateral
>Commission? What other "news" stories can we expect from slashdot?
It's a good thing they haven't discovered our secret nuclear program yet.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing li
On 14/11/06, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What other "news" stories can we expect from slashdot?
It's a comment (from an idiot) on a story, not a story.
--
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
http://number9.hellooperator.net/
__
I know Slashdot is not the most reliable source of news. I just thought that
was a bit interesting, either as a humor or
But yea, I'd have to agree the Onion is a more reliable source. :-)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
> I found this reading through the Slashdot thread
> about GPLing Java and the potentially of GPLing
> OpenSolaris.
>
> Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS
> to make OpenSolaris less 'free' or 'open'?
>
> Anybody know anything about this or it the usual
> FUD?
>
>
I found this reading through the Slashdot thread about GPLing Java and the
potentially of GPLing OpenSolaris.
Something inference about Sun taking a bribe from MS to make OpenSolaris less
'free' or 'open'?
Anybody know anything about this or it the usual FUD?
Erast Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the same feeling. Good move.
>
> And if we will see that Java/GPL community grows way faster then
> OpenSolaris/CDDL, than obvious questions will arise ... i.e. why not
> dual license OpenSolaris with GPL too?
If you like feedback, you cannot dual
On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 19:48 +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> On 11/13/06, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> > > stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> > > loved even
> > > inside Sun.
> > >
> > > Anybody knows more?
> >
> > It'
On 11/13/06, Bob Palowoda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> loved even
> inside Sun.
>
> Anybody knows more?
It's not an OpenSolaris issue. Java is not part of OpenSolaris.
Sun may consider
> If Sun does this, it is a good step, but it would
> stigmatise the CDDL as a license that is not really
> loved even
> inside Sun.
>
> Anybody knows more?
It's not an OpenSolaris issue. Java is not part of OpenSolaris.
---Bob
This message posted from opensolaris.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
