rxvt may be okay.
But mrxvt is better (supports tabs) : http://materm.sourceforge.net/wiki/
~m
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And if you change that you will find that the
> > behaviour in GNOME-terminal
> > is exactly not what you expect (as the backspace key
> > sends DEL and the
> > default erase setting is exactly what you want)
>
> BTW, I realized that the previous sentence
> And if you change that you will find that the
> behaviour in GNOME-terminal
> is exactly not what you expect (as the backspace key
> sends DEL and the
> default erase setting is exactly what you want)
BTW, I realized that the previous sentence was poorly written, I wanted to
communicate that Gn
> And if you change that you will find that the
> behaviour in GNOME-terminal
> is exactly not what you expect (as the backspace key
> sends DEL and the
> default erase setting is exactly what you want)
Stupid, SLOW Gnome terminal doesn't work for me anyway: All I get is ^? on the
screen when I p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> What is the default for GNOME Terminal in Solaris?
> (As seen when you hit "set compatibility options to defaults)
>
> Backspace generates ASCII DEL
> Delete key generates "Escape Sequence".
>
> So what's up with that?
>
> In the default user environment, the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do we have now in Solaris? Erase defaults to ^??
What is the default for GNOME Terminal in Solaris?
(As seen when you hit "set compatibility options to defaults)
Backspace generates ASCII DEL
Delete key generates "Escape Sequence".
So what's up w
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
Technical correctness should be thrown out in the
name of popularity.
I tend to think that technical correctness is a higher virtue than consensus,
popularity, ergonomics, or any other darn thing, and anyone who disagrees
is simply pandering.
Sorry, when the k
>> Technical correctness should be thrown out in the
>> name of popularity.
>
>I tend to think that technical correctness is a higher virtue than consensus,
>popularity, ergonomics, or any other darn thing, and anyone who disagrees
>is simply pandering.
Nah, Pi can be three if you want :-)
>it w
> Technical correctness should be thrown out in the
> name of popularity.
I tend to think that technical correctness is a higher virtue than consensus,
popularity, ergonomics, or any other darn thing, and anyone who disagrees
is simply pandering.
But since the power to enforce that without having
