Andrew Pattison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What the OpenSolaris project needs
> > the most is users. A bunch of them.
>
> OpenSolaris was created to get developers interested in Solaris, not users.
> Certainly Solaris could do with a few of those too.
I thought that OpenSolaris has nearly 1
The OpenSolaris project is similar to the Fedora project. See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
The primary reason for the existence of the opensolaris project is to
coordinate the distributed development of Solaris. (The open source version
of solaris is called opensolaris). User input is a value
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
First time I have learned that OpenSolaris is not interested in recruiting users.
Because it's not true. The emphasis on developers is because users
won't come without apps to run, so we need the developers first to
make it more attractive to the users, but more users is
> > What the OpenSolaris project needs
> > the most is users. A bunch of them.
>
> OpenSolaris was created to get developers interested
> in Solaris, not users. Certainly Solaris could do
> with a few of those too.
>
> Andrew.
First time I have learned that OpenSolaris is not interested in rec
> What the OpenSolaris project needs
> the most is users. A bunch of them.
OpenSolaris was created to get developers interested in Solaris, not users.
Certainly Solaris could do with a few of those too.
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> GPL won't help Solaris too much imho nor will it make
> Linux gain instant access to dtrace or zfs. Linux is
> getting zfs...it is on the way already. But it won't
> be the same...porting zfs over to Linux will not give
> it the same quality. Look at the XFS fiasco.
> In the article: In Sun's vi
