Ontology is overrated.
Go for the FreeBSD package and ports system, over 14'000 applications available.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1 on the reply counter, and I'm definitely interested in contributing to the
effort.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1 on reply counter.
tj yang
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> My experience is with patches rather than packages,
> but I'm sure I'd be able to offer some advice on how
> not to shoot yourself in the foot with packages
> also!
>
> Rob, I'd add to your list:
> * How do I update my packages?
Along a similar line (although we seem to be focused on packages)
> But the code is getting closer to release
Thats great news. The code for the patch and package tools will be a great
benefit to opensolaris.
My experience is with patches rather than packages, but I'm sure I'd be able to
offer some advice on how not to shoot yourself in the foot with packages
Dave,
I can help out by sanitizing and posting the ARC cases in support of Solaris
packaging rqmts and guidelines, recommended installation paths, etc. I've
identified a core set of documentation (not the source code) that can guide the
community in doing value-add packaging of components at lea