Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:47, Eric Boutilier wrote:
If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the list? You've
been reading it already
Because it's an aggregated recap of 2 weeks worth of list activity. I
agree, some will choose to bypass it,
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:38 +, Peter Tribble wrote:
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:47, Eric Boutilier wrote:
If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the list? You've
been reading it already
Because it's an aggregated recap of 2 wee
Hi,
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 10:38 +, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:47, Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
> > >If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the list?
> > >You've
> > >been reading it already
> > >
> >
> > Because it's an aggregated recap of 2 weeks worth
On Fri, 2006-03-10 at 23:47, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> >If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the list? You've
> >been reading it already
> >
>
> Because it's an aggregated recap of 2 weeks worth of list activity. I
> agree, some will choose to bypass it, but I think some wo
john levon wrote:
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:54:52PM -0800, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
If you are following, say, 10 lists, how about sending each roll-up mail
to the specific list on which it reports? This way the emails are
If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
On 3/9/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I'll do whatever people want of course. Here are some options I'll throw
out, off the top of my head:
1. Create another list as Glynn suggested
2. Don't post them to a list
a. Po
On 3/9/06, Jim Grisanzio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Boutilier wrote:
>
> > I'll do whatever people want of course. Here are some options I'll throw
> > out, off the top of my head:
> >
> > 1. Create another list as Glynn suggested
> > 2. Don't post them to a list
> >a. Post them to a pag
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 02:54:52PM -0800, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> If you are following, say, 10 lists, how about sending each roll-up mail
> to the specific list on which it reports? This way the emails are
If you're on the list, why would you need to know what's on the list? You've
been reading
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I'll do whatever people want of course. Here are some options I'll throw
out, off the top of my head:
1. Create another list as Glynn suggested
2. Don't post them to a list
a. Post them to a page on opensolaris.org instead
b. Post them to my blog instead
3. Don't ch
Glynn Foster wrote:
Hey,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 21:44 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
John, I misunderstood and made the reports available elsewhere
(RSS/XML feed) in addition to here because so many people prefer to
forgo this list; but I see now that you were suggesting posting them
elsewhere
Hey,
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 21:44 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> John, I misunderstood and made the reports available elsewhere
> (RSS/XML feed) in addition to here because so many people prefer to
> forgo this list; but I see now that you were suggesting posting them
> elsewhere instead of here...
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 09:44:32PM -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Also, in another post, John Levon wrote:
>
>== I thought you'd agreed these should go somewhere else than a
>widely-read
>== general opensolaris mailing list...
>
> John, I misunderstood and made the reports available
Glynn Foster wrote:
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:25 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
- Doing them semi-monthly instead of bi-weekly. Therefore, the ones
that I'm about to post will cover from 02/19 (picking up where the
last ones left off) to 02/28 (the
Hey,
I wonder if it's worth creating a new list for this, especially if
you've got the process almost automated? Perhaps opensolaris-summaries
or something?
Glynn
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 13:25 -0600, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
>
> - Doing them semi-monthly
Couple changes I'm going to try with this:
- Doing them semi-monthly instead of bi-weekly. Therefore, the ones
that I'm about to post will cover from 02/19 (picking up where the
last ones left off) to 02/28 (the last day of Feb). Then the next
batch will cover 03/01 to 03/15, etc...
- Follo
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
Excellent point, and I'd be glad to add some thoughts for what it's worth.
It's worth a lot. My thinking is simply that you are doing this;
therefore, you are following it closely and know more than I do so you
should comme
Jim Grisanzio wrote:
Eric Boutilier wrote:
I see this as complementary to (and possibly a source of additional
content for) the newsletter and summary initiatives that already exist.
Very nice, Eric. I'd love to include some of this data in the
newsletter, but I'm even more interes
Dennis Clarke wrote:
Can you get this output in a HTML format...
Well, if nothing else, for now we can always just put tags
around the plain text output.
and the nmaybe Derek can make it show up directly in an web page somewhere
I don't see why not, but I'm not sure which web page
hi all,
due to my research activity, I will be very happy to contribute both to the
bi-weekly roll-up report and to the newsletter. I think these ideas are very
good (and I'm planning to do something similar for my research, so it is
"natural" for me to agree and contribute).
bye
maurizio
ps:
19 matches
Mail list logo
