>
> >is there any chance to actually include those
> drivers in solaris
> >express? the cards supported by it are very common.
> has anyone talked
> >to the developer about that?
>
>
> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
> was renamed
> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusi
Casper,
Sorry, but I'm going to put you on the spot. Can you give instructions on how
to accomplish a Solaris boot via PXE? This is uncharted territory for me.
Gary
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ope
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:30 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
> >> all should have names ending in "e".
> >
> >Really, I hadn't heard about that.
>
> I'm go
>On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
>> all should have names ending in "e".
>
>Really, I hadn't heard about that.
I'm going to ask the author then. (I thought you were at least involved in
getti
>On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through?
>>
>> Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is
>> difficult.
>>
>> - Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver.
>> - Change all the inst
On Tuesday 26 September 2006 02:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through?
>
> Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is
> difficult.
>
> - Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver.
> - Change all the instances of
>What kind of hairy transition will you need to go through?
Renaming the ethernet driver of a headless internet facing system is
difficult.
- Remove the "rh" driver and add the "vfe" driver.
- Change all the instances of "rh" in the OS to "vfe"
- hostname.XX, dhcp.XX
- ipfilte
On Friday 22 September 2006 04:52 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't know where this renaming came from; clearly we will not be
> renaming our drivers but somehow in the process all of the drivers from
> our Japanese friend are being renamed.
We're having him change all of them to end in z thi
On Friday 22 September 2006 01:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
> all should have names ending in "e".
Really, I hadn't heard about that.
--
Alan DuBoff - Sun Microsystems
Solaris x86 Engineering - IHV/OEM Group
__
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >Seriously, I hope this renaming is *NOT* happening. Renaming is a
> >serious matter, particularly for network drivers, because it forces
> >users to modify configuration files scattered across the system.
> >
> >There's no requirement whatsoever that Ethernet drivers e
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> >> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
>> >> was renamed
>> >> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
>> >> Solaris.
>> >
>> >Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
>>
>>
>> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet dri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
> >> was renamed
> >> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
> >> Solaris.
> >
> >Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
>
>
> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
> all s
mini-itx / nano-itx
http://mini-itx.com/store/
Nice kit (if a little pricy).
On 22/09/06, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
> suitably modified
> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>
>
> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card dev
>> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
>> was renamed
>> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
>> Solaris.
>
>Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that ethernet drivers
all should have names ending in "e".
Casper
___
>> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
>> suitably modified
>> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>>
>>
>> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on
>> one of them)
>
>Which "VIA boards"? Who is the manufacturer of the appliance, and what is the
>appliance model na
>
> What about adding this to the OpenSolaris Network
> Appliance project?
> http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/appliances/an
> nouncements/
> solnetapp/
This mentions OpenSolaris running on a Soekris appliance, but no details. Or
was the just a proposal?
Has anyone actually tried t
> Yes;l I think it's one of the reasons the "rh" driver
> was renamed
> "vfe"; they're being prepared for inclusion in
> Solaris.
Which driver is "rh" clashing with?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
openso
> These VIA boards work fine with PXE boot (for
> suitably modified
> miniroot) and they also boot fine from flash.
>
>
> (We've installed Solaris on a flash card device on
> one of them)
Which "VIA boards"? Who is the manufacturer of the appliance, and what is the
appliance model name?
Thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
