Hi James,
Thanks for the confirmation, I think this is a valid RFE to at least
add examples with CIDR notation to the System Administration: IP
Services manual. At most, we could replace all of the addresses with
CIDR notation, add details about CIDR and its benefits, and add
examples of the e
Michelle Olson wrote On 02/14/06 12:02,:
> /etc/hostname. is documented in several procedures on
> docs.sun.com
That's good, I expect to find examples, procedures, tutorials and the
like in the System Administration Guides and similar documents on
docs.sun.com. But I don't usually look there for
Michelle Olson writes:
> No, the examples don't use IPv4 addresses with CIDR notation.
They should, though.
> Very few
> of the IPv4 address examples use CIDR prefixes. I
> should think that you could use CIDR prefixes in the
> /etc/hostname.interface file, but I am not sure.
Yes, you can. A
is.org
>Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:00:00 -0800
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.4)
Gecko/20041214
>X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re
UNIX admin wrote On 02/13/06 15:37,:
>>Just putting this into your /etc/hostname.rh0 file
>>will do the job:
>>
>> my-hostname/24
>
>When was this put in?
>Where exactly on docs.sun.com is this documented? There is a short snip about
>CIDR in Solaris 10 administration, but nothing on the CIDR en
> Two fairly minor nits with this otherwise complete
> advice:
>
> - "netmask + broadcast + up" is already assumed as
> as part of the
> interface configuration. It's better to leave it
> e it out.
Accepted.
> - /etc/netmasks is an ancient hack, and doesn't
> 't work as well as one
> might like
Yes thats exactly what I ment by 'up', thanks for the help.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
