Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Asterisk success

2006-09-22 Thread Casper . Dik
>Are you referring to the VIA Epia series? There is a whole pile of different >VIA Epia models? Yes. But they are for the most part variations on a theme. >They even have a VIA CPU. Is that a 32- or 64-bit CPU? 32 bit. >Which network driver(s) is the Solaris kernel using for those motherboar

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Asterisk success

2006-09-22 Thread UNIX admin
> There's only "one" kind (there are several different, > all mini-ITX with > more or fewer builtin functions; they seem to work > fine under Solaris) Are you referring to the VIA Epia series? There is a whole pile of different VIA Epia models? They even have a VIA CPU. Is that a 32- or 64-bit C

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Asterisk success

2006-09-22 Thread Casper . Dik
>> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that >> ethernet drivers >> all should have names ending in "e". > >Eee... I'm confused even more now. I just ran a man "rfe" and also a `find` on >/kernel and /platform for "rfe*", and came up with nothing. > >So if you or the person who came up

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Asterisk success

2006-09-22 Thread UNIX admin
> It was not clashing but someone apparently felt that > ethernet drivers > all should have names ending in "e". Eee... I'm confused even more now. I just ran a man "rfe" and also a `find` on /kernel and /platform for "rfe*", and came up with nothing. So if you or the person who came up with the