Joerg Schilling wrote:
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal
issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to duplication,
added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and other problems.
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal
> issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to duplication,
> added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and other problems.
This is indeed an importan
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal
issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to duplication,
added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and other problems.
While there are purely technical advantages of a gene
I am very glad to hear such a deep thought. Now return to the original
question: with so many hardware not supported by Solaris, what is the
solution ? Taking into consideration that specifications are not always
available. This solution is not perfect. I will not hesitate if most of the
hardwar
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal
issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to
duplication, added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and
other problems. While there are purely technical advantages of a
ge
IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal
issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to duplication,
added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and other problems.
While there are purely technical advantages of a generic usermode driver
framew
Gaopeng Chen - Sun China wrote:
Sounds good. Any concrete ideas? Is it for all devices or just part of
them? Seems it's difficult to directly make a set of generic interfaces
available for all devices. How about implementing the sub-interfaces for
each domain, and then gather and think about the
Sounds good. Any concrete ideas? Is it for all devices or just part of
them? Seems it's difficult to directly make a set of generic interfaces
available for all devices. How about implementing the sub-interfaces for
each domain, and then gather and think about the generic interfaces.
Such as usb de
+1, it'd make OpenSolaris support more and more devices, ...
Looking forward to more details.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I would like to start a project to enable running a driver in usr mode
as an application.
By this way we can leverage source code from other OSes by converting
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I would like to start a project to enable running a driver in usr mode
as an application.
By this way we can leverage source code from other OSes by converting them
into Solaris user application.
Also running in user mode make it easier to develop an
Hi, everyone,
I would like to start a project to enable running a driver in usr mode
as an application.
By this way we can leverage source code from other OSes by converting them
into Solaris user application.
Also running in user mode make it easier to develop and debug. Maybe
more robust.
11 matches
Mail list logo
