You could also try posting some of the information from this thread in the
performance forum at opensolaris.org :
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=26
and maybe you'll get more responses.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Bruno: Check out these links:
http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/postgres_on_opensolaris_using_quad
http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/igen_with_postgresql_8_4
http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/thundering_herd_of_elephants_for
http://blogs.sun.com/jkshah/entry/postgres_8_4_locksta
Le 31/07/09 08:37, Zdenek Kotala a écrit :
Hello,
The main problem with databasases on ZFS is that ZFS does not like
synchronous writes. If you want to use ZFS for PostgreSQL or any other
database you need tune ZFS and PostgreSQL configuration
Thanks for your kind attention, I already red so
Hello,
The main problem with databasases on ZFS is that ZFS does not like
synchronous writes. If you want to use ZFS for PostgreSQL or any other
database you need tune ZFS and PostgreSQL configuration. Easiest way is
to put XLOG on the separate UFS disk mounted with diretio. If you want
to use ZFS
> If you look closely at Scott's posts, you'll see that
> build 110 of OpenSolaris was 3000% faster than build
> 109 on the particular benchmark he was running.
No, build *118* was 3000% faster than 110. And double from 2008.11 release
(109?).
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Anon Y Mous wrote:
SXCE and OpenSolaris are both unfinished "works in progress" and the performance changes radically from one build to another.
In my particular case, I didn't notice any change between the different
builds I installed. The 8.4 postgresql version however is not that old.
__
Anon Y Mous wrote:
What build of SXCE are you using?
What do you see as output from these commands:
uname -a
cat /etc/release
amber ~ # uname -a
SunOS amber 5.11 snv_117 i86pc i386 i86xpv
amber ~ # cat /etc/release
Solaris Express Community Edition snv_117 X86
What build of SXCE are you using?
What do you see as output from these commands:
uname -a
cat /etc/release
SXCE and OpenSolaris are both unfinished "works in progress" and the
performance changes radically from one build to another. Read this thread:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thr
James Mansion wrote:
Bruno Damour wrote:
The surprising fact is that the performance is still slightly better
on my laptop than on the server. This has been true with postgresql
8.3 and now with postgresql 8.4 as well.
...
Is there any explanation you would think of ?
If you examine the disk
Bruno Damour wrote:
The surprising fact is that the performance is still slightly better
on my laptop than on the server. This has been true with postgresql
8.3 and now with postgresql 8.4 as well.
...
Is there any explanation you would think of ?
If you examine the disk in device manager on X
Hello,
The previous thread reminds me of one surprising fact I've been
fundering over for some time.
Now I love opensolaris and I have SXCE 64bit installed on my home server
(Quad Core E6600, Asus P5W-DH mobo, 8G ram PC6400, SATA disks in AHCI
mode). Zfs of course.
My work machine is a 2 yea
11 matches
Mail list logo
