> eam1, every post you present is old stuff and it has
> been asked before that you stop posting these.
>
> It's been almost 18 months since a RELEASE has been
> made (code likely frozen in Feb 2006 and it is almost
> Aug 2010). Almost every post now on discuss is stuff
> about the (non)future of
On 07/13/10 12:16 PM, John Plocher wrote:
+--
Please join the distro community and help make this happen. Joerg,
Moinak and the rest of us will welcome you with open keyboards! Like
you said, there are a few obstacles in the way of doing a completely
open distro right now (closed source I18
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Paul Gress wrote:
[...]>
> While I believe Oracle is gung-ho about Opensolaris, I don't believe it's in
> sync with our views. I believe they would like to close the source if they
> can. I'm starting to look at it this way.
>
> * Oracle is smart
> * If I were Or
eam1, every post you present is old stuff and it has been asked before that you
stop posting these.
It's been almost 18 months since a RELEASE has been made (code likely frozen in
Feb 2006 and it is almost Aug 2010). Almost every post now on discuss is stuff
about the (non)future of OpenSolari
> While I believe Oracle is gung-ho about Opensolaris, I don't believe it's in
> sync with our views. I believe they would like to close the source if they
> can. I'm starting to look at it this way.
>
I think they can do that easily. After all the source belongs
to them and they decide whether
+-- On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
| So I think not a Fork is required, but a "Cloning" is required.
This new project
| should be called maybe "Desktop Clone-aris" Where what we do is try to
| compile the source and recreate the missing closed binaries.
+--
Please join the di
As has become pretty obvious to most of us, I'll share a few characteristics
and let what's left of the old school community draw it's own conclusion:
1) Recent join dates.
2) Never post anything technical, nor demonstrate any technical insights or
actual technical knowledge.
3) Always pro Ora
On 07/13/10 07:08 AM, Edward Martinez wrote:
I still think Oracle is gung ho about OpenSolaris and still ironing things
out. this docs may seems old but they are dated 2010 and has the oracle banner
on them. I see it there is still interest.
quote:
This is just one update on Oracle's freq
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote:
> The community is tired of having to guess Oracle's intentions. This FAQ means
> nothing.
> Please stop posting every single URL that mentions OpenSolaris/Solaris in an
> attempt to paint a rosy reality.
And the non-stop paranoia, pessim
> I still think Oracle is gung ho about OpenSolaris and
> still ironing things out. this docs may seems old
> but they are dated 2010 and has the oracle banner on
> them. I see it there is still interest.
>
The community is tired of having to guess Oracle's intentions. This FAQ means
nothi
I still think Oracle is gung ho about OpenSolaris and still ironing things
out. this docs may seems old but they are dated 2010 and has the oracle banner
on them. I see it there is still interest.
quote:
This is just one update on Oracle's frequently asked questions (FAQs) for its
newly a
11 matches
Mail list logo
