On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:59 PM, me wrote:
> The OGB should really think about this
>
>
We did, almost 3 years ago
Since Oracle owns the trademarks (OpenSolaris *and* Solaris...), they can do
whatever they wish with them. See
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/trademark
-John
_
The obvious solution to this problem is to remove the "Open" from the name
Solaris and we would not have an issue at all. This is the reason there are
issues, keep the source code with the "OpenSolaris" name and the binary distro
should be renamed Solaris Next pre-beta or something of the sort.
On 06/30/10 12:40 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
On 29/06/2010, at 9:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1)
+1
So we no longer do. The obvious solution to the new order. I know for certain
that this has cost Oracle projects in the millions. Larry could care less,
however, as long as Oracle can continue pulling in projects worth tens/hundreds
of millions. Oracle's the new law in town. Cowboy up a
On 29/06/2010, at 9:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
On 06/29/10 09:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
Den 29-06-2010 16:09, Mike DeMarco skrev:
3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
via command line
That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
yet... ;-)
We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats why
Jörg,
You (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Matthias Pfützner wrote:
>
> > Why should a PAID ORACLE employee develop drivers for hardware that will
> > never
> > show up in an Oracle product? They do it on their spare time, just like you
> > and me!
>
> Why should a member of the community write soft
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> Why should a PAID ORACLE employee develop drivers for hardware that will never
> show up in an Oracle product? They do it on their spare time, just like you
> and me!
Why should a member of the community write software that will never show up
in Solaris because there i
> Did you see today's announcement of the new systems?
>
>
> alan
Impressive enough, but probably not of interest to those worrying about
when 2010.xx will be released.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> >
> > Again, you're asking the wrong audience here...
> Even
> > if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> > Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed
> to
> > tell anything...
>
> Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the
> questions, This is what is leading to the downfall of
> this development.
Mike,
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
> >
> > Again, you're asking the wrong audience here... Even
> > if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> > Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed to
> > tell anything...
>
> Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the questions, This is what is
> leading to the do
>revolt against ORACLE and get OpenSolaris out of their hands
I afraid that they *own* this project/product.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> Again, you're asking the wrong audience here... Even
> if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed to
> tell anything...
Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the questions, This is what is
leading to the downfall of this development. Without feedback `eve
Sorry, meant to reply to mdemarco...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It's summer. Programmers gone mountain-climbing ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Mike,
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
> > > 3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
> > in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
> > via command line
> >
> > That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
> > yet... ;-)
> We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats wh
> > 3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
> in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
> via command line
>
> That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
> yet... ;-)
We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats why 2010.X is not out yet.
What is getting fixe
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
2) Support for "new" hardware is still in development branches (new SAS 2
controllers from LSI in svn_134)
3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least in the GUI): NIC
configu
> Ahem:
>http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/README.txt
> http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/
>
> Cheers,
> -Shawn
Thanks ;}
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You (Giovanni) wrote:
> I really do hope it it like you say.
>
> Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
> I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
>
> 1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
Has been mentioned many times here: Oracle h
Hi Giovanni,
On 06/29/10 06:57, Giovanni wrote
4) some key components (i.e. ramdisk implementation) have severe performance
issues (a ram disk running at 500MB/s on DDR3 1333 is slower than working on a
striped physical disk set; same ramdisk on Linux on same hw runs at several
GB/s)
B
On 06/28/10 09:57 PM, Giovanni wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
2) Support for "new" hardware is still
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
2) Support for "new" hardware is still in development branches (new SAS 2
cont
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Giovanni
>
> We were developing a solution based on OpenSolaris/ZFS
> GIven the current silence, we are seriously evaluating the move to
> Linux.
There is no current silence.
Did you see today's announcement of the new systems?
alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
To answer my own post, I just followed the above; it was disappointing from the
point of view of this thread - OpenSolaris was never mentioned (Oracle Solaris
was).
Still waiting for any signs...
Chavdar
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
> I agree with you.
>
> We were developing a solution based on
> OpenSolaris/ZFS
> GIven the current silence, we are seriously
> evaluating the move to Linux.
>
> It is impossibile to develop anything relying on
> something that is in the cloud: how to trust (and be
> trusted by customers)?
>
>
I agree with you.
We were developing a solution based on OpenSolaris/ZFS
GIven the current silence, we are seriously evaluating the move to Linux.
It is impossibile to develop anything relying on something that is in the
cloud: how to trust (and be trusted by customers)?
I am afraid of this, bu
[...]
> This is what you get when you register for the event
> with a host running OpenSolaris:
> Test Your System
>
> Operating System Failed We have detected that
> your operating system does not meet the optimal
> webcast specifications for listening to and/or
> view
> Do you participate in a commodore or amiga discussion
> group? If opensolaris
> is dead or dying, why don't you be productive and go
> discuss the new OS that
> you're going to use instead moving forward.
>
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> o
>
> https://event.on24.com/eventRegistration/EventLobbySer
> vlet?target=registration.jsp&eventid=214702&sessionid=
> 1&key=292835FC0FC2AFAD25A9273BA0F489FF&sourcepage=regi
> ster
>
> The blurb does not mention Opensolaris specifically,
> but it is difficult to imagine not being discussed at
> al
> > I remember the death of commodore and the Amiga. I
> > was a avid user of the Amiga and hung on month
> after
> > month as promises were made but nothing ever came
> of
> > them. Open Solaris reminds me of that very painful
> > time and it is a shame.
> > A simple explanation of why the delay
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Mike DeMarco
>
> I remember the death of commodore and the Amiga.
Do you participate in a commodore or amiga discussion group? If opensolaris
is dead or dying, why don't you
> I remember the death of commodore and the Amiga. I
> was a avid user of the Amiga and hung on month after
> month as promises were made but nothing ever came of
> them. Open Solaris reminds me of that very painful
> time and it is a shame.
> A simple explanation of why the delay is not too
> muc
On 28 Jun 2010, at 13:40, Mike DeMarco wrote:
> I remember the death of commodore and the Amiga. I was a avid user of the
> Amiga and hung on month after month as promises were made but nothing ever
> came of them. Open Solaris reminds me of that very painful time and it is a
> shame.
And yet
I remember the death of commodore and the Amiga. I was a avid user of the Amiga
and hung on month after month as promises were made but nothing ever came of
them. Open Solaris reminds me of that very painful time and it is a shame.
A simple explanation of why the delay is not too much to ask!
37 matches
Mail list logo
