Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
> > 2) utilities should only be written (enhanced) to the long options part
> > of the CLIP specification in "logical groups". (i.e., a group of
> > related utilities should be consistent in their use or non-use of long
> > opt
Bill Sommerfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:40, John Martinez wrote:
> > Am I the only one that doesn't like the --something-or-other options
> > of GNU related software? Please don't do this to Solaris!
>
> A couple years ago we had a very long, very painful discussion
Bill Sommerfeld wrote:
2) utilities should only be written (enhanced) to the long options part
of the CLIP specification in "logical groups". (i.e., a group of
related utilities should be consistent in their use or non-use of long
options).
Or in their use of other option syntaxes, like the
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 20:40, John Martinez wrote:
> Am I the only one that doesn't like the --something-or-other options
> of GNU related software? Please don't do this to Solaris!
A couple years ago we had a very long, very painful discussion about
this topic under the name of "CLIP".
Opinions
