On Dec 2, 2010, at 16:06, Gleb Kursou wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Gert M. wrote:
>
> My tone is that of a wakeup call for Garrett. He needs one.
Although I have no idea who you are or what makes you think you are entitled to
express your opinion in this place (Google lacks detail
On Sep 22, 2010, at 10:24, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
>> So perhaps Illumos/OpenIndiana will become the OurDelta or MariaDB
>> equivalent of Oracle Solaris and outshine its predecessor. :)
>
> I am very doubtful about this. Oracle states
> (http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/173478) that
ve been put under the BSD license in spring
>> 2009.
>>
>
> You should read the post, which mentions: "in February 2009, Simon
> told the crowd at FOSDEM that Sun was going to "change the license to
> Sun's copyrights in the RPC code to a standard
On Aug 17, 2010, at 13:55, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> it is not readily available today,
... apart from in every Linux distribution where it appears as "IcedTea".
S.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Aug 16, 2010, at 23:05, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> Java is not GPL. It's not even open source.
Sun's implementation of Java is available in an open source form known as
"OpenJDK", licensed under GPLv2. Had Googled used that instead of Apache
harmony and Dalvik they would have received bo
On Aug 16, 2010, at 15:00, Paul Gress wrote:
> On 08/16/10 09:55 AM, Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> On 8/16/2010 10:34 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
>>
>>> On 08/16/10 03:36 AM, Nikola M. wrote:
>>>
I would like it to be that w
On Aug 16, 2010, at 00:13, Jonathan Edwards wrote:
>> All companies who were working with
>> OpenSolaris/Solaris are invited to
>> join this movement and liberate OpenSolaris.
>
> but how do we liberate the source from the CDDL?
> that still seems like it could be a bit of a problem
> if the
On Aug 13, 2010, at 16:39, Paul Gress wrote:
> On 08/13/10 06:35 AM, andrew wrote:
>>
>>>
>> I don't expect to ever see binaries for the OpenSolaris distribution again.
>> The most I think we can expect is a preview of Solaris 11 along the lines of
>> the old "Solaris Express" programme. I
On Jul 30, 2010, at 16:09, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> If you "jump ship" to a community
> OS, aren't you leaving behind all the contributions that are made by the
> paid employees?
No, that's not a given. It is entirely possible to run a downstream community
that maintains a derivative that in
On Jul 12, 2010, at 16:50, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> As a result of the language used in some of these latest threads, I am
> removing some people from this list.
Thanks, Jim, that's helpful, appropriate and proportionate.
S.
___
opensolaris-discuss
On Jul 9, 2010, at 10:49, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 9 Jul 2010, at 03:39, John Plocher wrote:
>
>> It might be worth going just to find out who the current "head of
>> Oracle Solaris development" really is; it'll certainly be more than
>> the OGB has been able to find out all year...
>>
>> Migh
Really ? if so, I think there would be a big bug,anyone else can help
confirm this ?
Thanks.
Simon
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:10 AM, John Plocher wrote:
> Hot damn - a thread that is actually related to OpenSolaris code !!! :-)
>
> Given the difficulties in enumerating all the
ed on ce0
interface),why ? The similar issue wouldn't appear on Solaris 9.
Thanks.
Regards,
Simon
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Apr 5, 2010, at 14:19, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> Therefore the idea
> to opensource the software has never been intended to create additional
> revenue from it, but to generate mind-share with the developer community, so
> that in FUTURE more ISVs, or big software-companies or even smaller mi
On Apr 4, 2010, at 21:46, James Mansion wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>> It's been an interesting "does he take sugar" experience watching the
>> conversation about me; I thought I'd interject with a link to a story that
>> has correct information:
&g
[I've included opensolaris-discuss@ for this message, but please direct
follow-up only to ogb-disc...@]
On Apr 4, 2010, at 20:17, HeCSa wrote:
> Hi!
> Reading several threads about the lack of information regarding what's going
> on with Oracle and their relation and initiatives with the commun
It's been an interesting "does he take sugar" experience watching the
conversation about me; I thought I'd interject with a link to a story that has
correct information:
http://www.infoworld.com/d/adventures-in-it/former-sun-open-source-officer-joins-osi-board-109
As for Oracle: Oracle are fa
On Mar 31, 2010, at 13:34, Mike DeMarco wrote:
> Two more items of interest have just surfaced:
>
> Oracle has pulled all engineers from wonderland project.
That's hardly news. Wonderland was clearly headed for the door even pre-ORCA
and the people working on it went off immediately CIC happen
On Feb 23, 2010, at 14:03, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Matthew Nawrocki wrote:
Should we petition Oracle to open source any remaining proprietary
bits and then just give it away?
Sun already open sourced pretty much everything it could (with a
few exceptions,
mostly
Hi,
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> is SUNWefc (or equivalent) installed?
>
>
> Or SUNWckr?
>
> One or both of those packages seem to be missing on your config.
>
>
i have installed opensolaris from the SXCE DVD single image ISO
a
hi
i have installed opensolaris sxce b129 on my system (ultraSparc
T2). the install from DVD to sata disk went well. but upon reboot
from the SATA disk, i get the following panic (plse see below).
note that i have no problem with solaris 10.
thx for any help on this issue,
rgds
-jfs
Boot devi
On May 9, 2009, at 06:58, Cooky Hex wrote:
Hello everyone!
I just joined the OpenSolaris family. How are you guys doing? :)
I found a file named "osol-0906-111a-x86.usb " at
http://www.genunix.org but have no idea what to do wit it.
Actually I do want to a create OpenSolaris Live USB to boot f
So I installed opensolaris 2008.11 on VMware Workstation 6.5.1 -- as many
people have blogged about. Problem is when I try to use the cdrom... it just
doesn't seem to work. All I have is two broken links:
/cdrom/cdrom0 -> ./opensolaris
/cdrom/opensolaris -> /media/OpenSolaris
Any ideas how to deb
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Simon wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Simon Hardy-Francis
>> wrote:
>>> So I downloaded the CD and installed it perfectly on a VMware guest; I got
>>> the l
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 4:02 AM, Simon Hardy-Francis
> wrote:
>> So I downloaded the CD and installed it perfectly on a VMware guest; I got
>> the live CD mode and then I clicked on the install icon and everything just
So I downloaded the CD and installed it perfectly on a VMware guest; I got the
live CD mode and then I clicked on the install icon and everything just worked.
Then I tried to install natively on an Acer AM5640 PC. The CD booted as
expected but instead of going into the live CD GUI then I get the
If people in the USA use the OpenSolaris Lending Project store[1] to
buy it (or use the Project's Amazon link[2]), the Project[3] will get
credit from Amazon that can then be applied at Kiva[4].
[1] http://astore.amazon.com/opensolaris-20
[2] http://www.amazon.com/?tag=opensolaris-20
[3] http
On Mar 2, 2009, at 20:48, Joerg Schilling wrote:
do you know the reason for that?
I do, yes. It was in retaliation for a dispute between Sun and Apache.
S.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Mar 2, 2009, at 18:54, John Sonnenschein wrote:
Hey everyone.
Does anyone know if we're putting together a bid for GSoC this year?
Applications open on the 9th. I'd be interested in helping out by
mentoring or just helping put together the bid.
Hi John,
Google blocked all Sun-related
So i hope this is enough:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ vmstat 5
kthr memorypagedisk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr cd s0 -- -- in sy cs us sy id
0 0 0 2063232 24720 4 31 0 0 0 0 16 1 -1 0 0 283 3147 851 53 3 44
0 0 0 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ vmstat 5
kthr memorypagedisk faults cpu
r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr cd s0 -- -- in sy cs us sy id
0 0 0 2063232 24720 4 31 0 0 0 0 16 1 -1 0 0 283 3147 851 53 3 44
0 0 0 2059952 18244 2 7 0 0
ok,
vmstat 5 says i have 2gb off swap space and 18mb of this are unused or free.
Is this swap stored in the swap partition of "swap -l"?
If yes why dose "swap -l" show me that it is empty?
And which app usese 2gb of swap an my whole ram?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
In the standart Installation, the installer Created a swap partition of 2gb.
swap -lh
swapfile -> /dev/dsk/c4d0s1
dev -> 102,1
swaplo -> 4k
blocks -> 2,0G
free -> 2,0G
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
ope
Hallo,
I installed OpenSolaris 2008.05 on my ThinkpadT41 with 512mb of ram and 1,6 ghz
intel centrino.
I started gnome and added the system monitor in my panel. I couldn't belief tat
my ram is full and solaris doesn't use any swap space. I started many gui
app's, the machine slows down but it
hi,
could someone plse tell me what are the arguments of the "-B" flag in this
mkisofs invokation someone posted in this forum last month? should it be used
at all?
mkisofs is -G .../hsfs.bootblock -B ... -l -ldots -R -N -D -V SOL_11_SPARC -o
.../solaris_1.iso .../solaris_1.product
i am conf
James Carlson wrote:
> jean-francois simon writes:
>> can i install opensolaris on a sparc system? (ultraIII+ system)?
>> how to i build the ISOs?
>
> Get a copy of Solaris Express Community Edition (SX:CE). There are
> links on this page:
>
> http://opensola
hi,
can i install opensolaris on a sparc system? (ultraIII+ system)?
how to i build the ISOs?
thx a lot
-jfs
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
What's the situation regarding SXCE and the new 2008.05 and future releases?
My understanding from what I've seen is that SXCE is a release made
approximately every 2 weeks, and is based on the Nevada project.
Again, my understanding of the 2008.05 release is that:
1. this will be released only
BTW, I just saw this on my profile page today:
"This user is not a leader of any communitites."
Is the word "communitites" derived from "community" and "tights", tights for
the use of the community -- i.e. everybody?
Looks like an amusing typo to me, and it's probably the same for everybody's
.2+Sun): [EMAIL PROTECTED]:15:00
Simon
==
Blog: http://breden.org.uk
ZFS articles:
http://breden.org.uk/2008/03/02/a-home-fileserver-using-zfs/
==
This message posted from
cal same(100g),but the actual
available size is not same,why ?
- For EMC CX700 LUN,after label,it was partitioned by OS with 51200
cylinders,but as for HDS AMS100 LUN,it's 5461 cylinders,what make the
difference ?
Thanks.
Rgds,
Simon
___
ope
Yes, and with 'uadmin' I think it had no effect. Trouble is, I tried lots of
things and nothing seemed to work, and it's hard to remember all the different
combinations of things tried :(
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-disc
I notice that here:
http://blogs.sun.com/randyf/entry/testing_suspend_and_resume_for
it says that currently only x86 systems are supported -- hopefully this covers
AMD64 dual core processors.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-
Hi Nacho, according to Randy Fishel, the multiple core bug was fixed in b82 --
see here:
http://blogs.sun.com/randyf/entry/solaris_suspend_and_resume_how
I'm not sure what the bug id was though.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
Thanks Andrew, I read that page already from Randy and tried issuing a 'uadmin
3 21' to check if suspend to RAM is supported and it returned to the command
line immediately with no message, so it looks good I think. I have 'S3 suspend
to RAM' enabled in my motherboard's BIOS. However, as expecte
ment -- is that a bad omen?
I've described the steps I took here in more detail, if anyone else wants to
try to see if suspend/resume works with their hardware:
http://breden.org.uk/2008/04/05/home-fileserver-suspend/
Thanks in advance.
Simon
This message posted from
If you want to sources of "Call graph" plugin for NetBeans you should get hg
sources for repository:
http://hg.netbeans.org/main/contrib/
Module in the folder:
cnd.callgraph
See in netbeans "how to download sources":
http://www.netbeans.org/community/sources/
This message posted from opensolar
y have
side effects)
# svcs | grep samba
#
When I try to access the share from the mac using autofs, I see the following
message in /var/adm/messages:
Mar 27 20:38:48 solarisbox smbd[667]: [ID 653746 daemon.notice]
SmbLogon[WORKGROUP\simon]: NO_SUCH_USER
So, something changed?
See here:
h
On Feb 14, 2008, at 14:23, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> Moinak Ghosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
However, it should be noted that the Solaris port of VirtualBox
is only a beta, and it came out, AFAIK, only yesterday. I am
sure there are many loose ends
You can try it now!
I prepared a set of IDE projects for build 77 of Open Solaris.
You can download it by the following link:
http://osproject.sundemo.ru/
What's your opinion?
Any feedback is highly appreciated.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
>What kind of special support do you think is needed for OpenSolaris ?
This is a list of some lacks of functionality:
- C/C++ project of all OS sources requires at least 1.3Gb of heap memory. It
exceeds a standard NB memory requirements.
- Standard NB tree and list cannot show a long list (OS cont
Hello,
I develop C/C++ IDE functionality for Netbeans and Sun Studio. I'd like to add
Open Solaris support to the IDE. I'd like to know your needs and opinions in
this respect.
First, is there any interest in IDE at all?
If yes, what are your typical needs? (For example: "I mostly edit, build
On Dec 19, 2007, at 15:45, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Once it has been verified that it is possible to contribute to
> OpenSolaris
> I am happy to do so but please note that:
Do you have reasons to believe this is not the case? I understood the
request-sponsor process to be working reasonably
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:28, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 9:25 AM, Simon Phipps <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:18, Shawn Walker wrote:
>>
>>> I often hear the excuse that "we're still learning" -- but
On Nov 30, 2007, at 15:18, Shawn Walker wrote:
> I often hear the excuse that "we're still learning" -- but some things
> are plain ole' "common sense."
Sadly "common sense" isn't that common, nor is there universal
agreement what it means.
S.
___
to try to get to the matter as soon as I
can. It would have helped greatly if Neil et al had written to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] first rather than making the initial public salvo.
>
> Thank you Simon, for taking the time to verify and accurately report
> on the situation using the appropriat
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:41, Shawn Walker wrote:
> It's hard not to focus on Sun when their management team's inability
> to clearly communicate both inside and outside of their company
> continues to make the communities they participate in look like
> nothing more than a "pr move" and leads to de
On Nov 30, 2007, at 13:29, UNIX admin wrote:
>> I've been investigating. Take a look at
>> http://tinyurl.com/ys5hf3 -
>> this was the change Neil et al made to the
>> governance.
>
> Dear Mr. Phipps, I can see the nicely colored changes, but without
> knowing who made which change, even the pr
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:20, UNIX admin wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I don't know about Shawn, but I'll write for myself:
>
> I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan
> Schwartz.
> I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague
> and show that they have spi
On Nov 30, 2007, at 09:44, Ché Kristo wrote:
> Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled
> "Restoring Sun approved governance" : https://opends.dev.java.net/
> source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-
> Governance.html?rev=3475&r1=3475&r2=3474 ?
That is t
On Nov 30, 2007, at 05:01, Shawn Walker wrote:
> http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-
> the-opends-community-and-to-sun-microsystems/
I've been investigating. Take a look at http://tinyurl.com/ys5hf3 -
this was the change Neil et al made to the governance. All
On Nov 16, 2007, at 13:42, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 15/11/2007, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Shawn Walker writes:
For example, if I wanted to take the source code of the hypervisor
manager and add bits and pieces of OpenS
Have you guys tried using something like Octave (a freeware MATLAB
clone). It might not be MATLAB, buts its free. We've had luck with it
on the Linux environment without many problems.
A Solaris problem is available from http://www.sunfreeware.com I think.
Si Hammond
University of Warwick
On 16
On Nov 15, 2007, at 11:40, Shawn Walker wrote:
> http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2203486/sun-tiptoes-gplv3
>
> According to VNUNet, Sun plans on a piece of server virtualisation
> software as GPLv3.
>
> The article is also not clear as to whether xVM Server, a "trimmed
> Solaris kernel, allowin
On Nov 1, 2007, at 21:59, John Sonnenschein wrote:
> the press releases
What press releases? I am talking now to Terri Molini of Sun PR and
there have been no press releases around the Indiana alpha.
S.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opens
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:43, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 10:42:51AM -0700, Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/indiana/downloads/current/in-preview.iso
>>>
>>> Is this release freely redistributable? It seems not, right?
>>
>> It is.
>
> Yay - but the Binary Licens
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:49, Brandorr wrote:
> The difference is that Netscape created a standalone foundation
> (non-profit org).
Another key difference is they were going out of business and threw
the code over the wall for others to maintain*. That is not the
situation here.
S.
* Rhetori
On Nov 1, 2007, at 20:22, Brandorr wrote:
> Sun's distro,
I realise that phrase reflects your viewpoint clearly, but may I
suggest that using it the way you are to describe the work of the
Indiana Project continues division rather than healing it?
S.
__
On Nov 1, 2007, at 18:49, John Sonnenschein wrote:
> Indiana's just a developer preview, the name can be revoked for the
> general release or next preview without causing too much harm
Or, indeed, retained and permitted for other distros...
S.
___
op
On Nov 1, 2007, at 19:15, Brandorr wrote:
> Pretty much the only
> people who don't have an issue with the branding process are Sun
> marketing and a few people defending them.
Hey, I'm not saying I don't have an issue. But I am trying to be
positive because we get to move on from where we are
On Nov 1, 2007, at 16:37, S h i v wrote:
> Neither of the 2 is a win-win situation
> - The current situation
> - Going independant without Sun's involvement
Completely agree here.
By the way (and not directed just at you), speaking of "Sun" as a
decision-maker is unhelpful in my view. "Sun" i
On Nov 1, 2007, at 15:32, Marty Duey wrote:
> On 11/1/2007 9:25 AM, John Plocher wrote:
>
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>
>>> So you like to call SchilliX OpenSolaris?
>>
>>
>>
>> Absolutely yes - one of my objectives in this branding effort is to
>> find a way to allow this (or something similar).
On Nov 1, 2007, at 15:25, John Plocher wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>> So you like to call SchilliX OpenSolaris?
>
>
> Absolutely yes - one of my objectives in this branding effort is to
> find a way to allow this (or something similar).
+1. We just have to make sure our proposal is one fidu
On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:54, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>>> That's a significant community-wide power. It's a big change,
>>> without
>>> regard to the trademark legal issues.
>>
>> Only if we sit around and leave it as-
On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:38, James Carlson wrote:
> Simon Phipps writes:
>>
>> On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:18, James Carlson wrote:
>>
>>> That's a significant community-wide power. It's a big change,
>>> without
>>> regard to the trademark le
On Nov 1, 2007, at 14:18, James Carlson wrote:
> That's a significant community-wide power. It's a big change, without
> regard to the trademark legal issues.
Only if we sit around and leave it as-is. You're speaking as if all
decisions are made and final. That's not so. There's a stake in th
On Nov 1, 2007, at 13:35, James Carlson wrote:
> For instance, one direct effect is that prior to Indiana, a project
> was "in OpenSolaris" if it went through the established community
> endorsement process, and no other change was needed. Now that
> "OpenSolaris" is a distribution, the Indiana
[Follow-up to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Nov 1, 2007, at 12:54, Alan Burlison wrote:
> If someone has something concrete, can we please have a page set up
> and
> the link widely disseminated? Ta.
http://www.genunix.org/wiki/index.php?
title=Trademark_usage_and_Branding_guideline
S.
We rej
On Nov 1, 2007, at 02:01, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> So why not just create something that runs and call it OpenSolaris
>> and then
> we are done with the confusion. There are bigger battles to fight
> than word
> games.
I could not agree more with you there, Dennis. We are where we are.
And
On Oct 31, 2007, at 22:09, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>>> Who has the mandate to say when iteration is appropriate and when
>>> the democratic process is appropriate?
>> Oh, the irony :-)
>
> I wasn't being ironic.
Well, actually...
On Oct 31, 2007, at 21:57, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
>> Framing OpenSolaris as a republic, constitutional monarchy or
>> other political system doesn't help much in my view. This is an
>> open source community. The way it works is peop
On Oct 31, 2007, at 21:23, Alan Burlison wrote:
> The normal way a democracy works is
Framing OpenSolaris as a republic, constitutional monarchy or other
political system doesn't help much in my view. This is an open
source community. The way it works is people do stuff collectively
toget
[Reply-to points at [EMAIL PROTECTED] where I
suggest we focus discussion]
On Oct 31, 2007, at 20:16, Alan Burlison wrote:
> What will be the point of having a vote on something that is a fait
> accompli?
That's a very negative way to frame things, in my view. We are in a
time of change, and
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:53, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> If we like to use the CPU for workstations, 64 bit would be nice,
> but there is
> a bigger market for embeddded systems in 32 bits. Unless someone
> pays for the
> project, it seems to make more sense to target to the embedded
> market a
On Sep 25, 2007, at 12:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> A Sparcv9 will not fint into the biggest FPGA today. It needs 2.5-3x
> the chip space that a Sparcv8 needs.
>
> It is not only the registers but also the ALU.
Seems Xilinx may be making an FPGA that's big enough now, at least
for a single cor
On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:32, Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-09-07 at 11:37 +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
>> Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe I'm bitter and jaded because I'm fed up with the lack of
>>> responsibility taken by the said parties. I'm sorry but if I
>>> fobbed off
>>> responsi
usr/local
Filesystem iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s66465258 3482011816% /usr/local
How to fix it ? I've re-created the UFS filesystem and run fsck even.
TIA.
Best Rgds,
Simon
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Hi Anybody who can help?
Regards
Simon
Simon Murugathasan
Customer Solution Architect
Central Architecture and Design, FPM
FUJITSU
Lovelace Road, Bracknell, Berks, RG12 8SN
Tel: +44 (0) 870 234 or internally 7302 8100
Mob: +44 (0) 778 715 1861
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http
usr/local
Filesystem iused ifree %iused Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s66465258 3482011816% /usr/local
How to fix it ? I've re-created the UFS filesystem and run fsck even.
TIA.
Best Rgds,
Simon
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Allen,
Thanks for your quick reply,it's quite clean.
Rgds,
Simon
On 7/6/07, Lu, Baolu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Gzip drive:
> A high-capacity floppy disk drive developed by Iomega Corporation. Zip disks
> are slightly larger than conventional floppy disks, a
Gurus,
I'm newer to Solaris 10,one question need your help:
what is Jaz drive and Zip drive for Solaris 10?
Thanks.
Rgds,
Simon
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Jun 27, 2007, at 18:11, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 04:03:40PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
There's a *lot* of legwork involved with becoming a non-profit -
be it
a 501(c)3 like Apache or a 501(c)6 like Eclipse. To qual
On Jun 26, 2007, at 02:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun going bust shouldn't disrupt OpenSolaris. Whether or not
that will ever happen, who knows, but the two shouldn't be joined
at the hip.
The source code is forkable, GenUnix.org exists, we have a large,
diverse membership as well as a s
On Jun 26, 2007, at 02:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't anyone in the least bit interested seeing OpenSolaris
actually be able to employ people or pay for things itself
rather than depend on the good will of Sun to do it all?
OK, I'm confused. Earlier you asserted that open source was all a
I would like to suggest follow-up is directed solely to advocacy-
discuss (I have set reply-to).
On Jun 26, 2007, at 01:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, I feel that some kind of prize or reward is essential,
otherwise
we don't stand a very good chance of getting the right result
unless
I would like to suggest follow-up is directed solely to advocacy-
discuss (I have set reply-to).
On Jun 26, 2007, at 01:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And yes, I feel that some kind of prize or reward is essential,
otherwise
we don't stand a very good chance of getting the right result
unless
On Jun 22, 2007, at 13:06, James Carlson wrote:
First of all, the archives are open. Anyone can read them. And
anyone can file a subscription request to be added to the list, and as
long as the request is reasonable (and not "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"),
I'll approve it. The list itself isn't hidden.
On Jun 5, 2007, at 01:37, Keith M Wesolowski wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 12:23:30PM +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
So since the Desktop seemingly isn't relevant enough, I've gone and
My personal feelings about relevance aren't worth a hill of beans. If
the Desktop Group believes exploring t
On May 31, 2007, at 15:24, Brian Gupta wrote:
One other comment. Generally, a project proposal, would be posted to
the interested communities for comment, before being submitted fait
acompli to the OGB. (I have cc'ed in those communities that I think,
at a minimum, should be included
Actually
On May 31, 2007, at 13:36, James Carlson wrote:
I don't think anyone is saying that you can't create a distribution
yourself without bothering with any project, community, or governing
board. You can. Knock yourself out.
But that's not what's happening. If a Sun-sponsored team went off
out
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
