On 02/01/12 12:44, Will Fiveash wrote:
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 10:16:10AM -0800, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 02/01/12 10:06, Cathleen Reiher wrote:
I had some troubleshooting material about the Solaris CIFS
project published on genunix.org. I tried to get to it yesterday,
and it's vanished
On 02/01/12 10:06, Cathleen Reiher wrote:
I had some troubleshooting material about the Solaris CIFS
project published on genunix.org. I tried to get to it yesterday,
and it's vanished!
Is there any way for me to retrieve my content so that I can
publish it in an alternate way? Thanks!
You can
On 11/10/11 18:09, Paul Gress wrote:
Following previous messages, to get Solaris Express 11 updated I had to run:
pkg uninstall 'pkg://opensolaris.org/*' \
> 'pkg://contrib.opensolaris.org/*' \
> 'pkg://jucr.opensolaris.org/*' \
> 'pkg://Multimedia/*' \
> 'pkg://kdeips-dev/*' \
> 'pkg://ips
On 11/11/11 10:55, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/12/11 06:52 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
On 11/11/11 09:37, Andrew Watkins wrote:
Now on Solaris 11 it does not:
==
grep andrew /etc/user_attr
andrewprofiles=Primary Administrator;roles=root
Solaris 11 no longer include
On 11/10/11 02:48, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 09/11/2011 22:29, Shawn Walker wrote:
I suggest someone adds a note on how to find and remove problematic
opensolaris.org packages. I'm sure anyone who has a system which started
life as an OpenSolaris box with have some.
Just for reference for
On 11/09/11 14:22, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 11:17 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/09/11 13:48, Ian Collins wrote:
So it does. I also had to remove wine, in response to
pfexec pkg uninstall openoffice
Creating Plan -
pkg uninstall: The requested change to the system attempts to install
On 11/09/11 13:48, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 10:08 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/09/11 13:03, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 09:46 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Try:
pfexec pkg update '*@latest'
That will tell the package system that you're trying to update to the
latest
On 11/09/11 13:09, Ian Collins wrote:
...
So there isn't an OpenOffice package for Solaris 11?
At this time, there are no native OpenOffice packages available for
Solaris 11.
However, the tarball version available from openoffice.org should work
just fine.
-Shawn
_
On 11/09/11 13:03, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 09:46 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/09/11 12:39, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 07:13 AM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Brian,
Try this one:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/upgrade-1.html
The main OS 11 library
On 11/09/11 12:39, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 07:13 AM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Brian,
Try this one:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/upgrade-1.html
The main OS 11 library (English) is here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/index.html
Let us know h
On 11/09/11 11:11, Ian Collins wrote:
On 11/10/11 07:13 AM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Brian,
Try this one:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/html/E24456/upgrade-1.html
The main OS 11 library (English) is here:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E23824_01/index.html
Let us know h
On 11/08/11 05:38, Jordi wrote:
Hi all,
I'm plying with Solaris 11 EA, but I'm getting all the time this errors
when I'm triying to install some package:
jespasac@solaris11ea:~$ sudo pkg install pkg:/slim_install@0.1-0.151.0.1
Creating Plan |
pkg install: No matching version of slim_install can
On 10/22/11 12:47, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
Hello. I'm trying to remove gnome packages recursively on OI_151. pkg
dies unexpectedly. See below. It recommends to register bug at
http://defect.opensolaris.org but I'm not sure illumos and openindiana
projects still use opensolaris.org site and its B
On 10/10/11 11:45, Orvar Korvar wrote:
Regarding Containers, are they sparse yet?
And as someone pointed out, S11 is coming in november.
http://www.oracle.com/webapps/events/ns/EventsDetail.jsp?p_eventId=140654&src=7255745&src=7255745&Act=27
Solaris 11 does not support sparse zones.
My unders
On 04/26/11 08:38 AM, Andre Lue wrote:
Building an ips image, I start from snv_134 http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev. I
then upgrade this to illumos bits from a local nightly illumos repo.
What I don't understand is why no update will take place from snv_134 to
snv_148/illumos nightly unless I a
On 04/21/11 01:05 PM, M I wrote:
Fair enough, Shawn. Up until now, our Solaris driver builds had version
numbers like 1.00a, 1.00b, etc. but for future builds we will look at changing
the version numbers to something like 1.00.0, 1.00.1, etc.
We wanted alphanumeric support so that we could c
On 04/21/11 11:36 AM, M I wrote:
I was able to create an IPS server for our out-of-box driver that allows our
test engineers to download/install it to their test systems. One problem I am
having is that our out-of-box driver version numbers are alpha-numeric.
Unfortunately IPS only allows st
- sik3...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Creating a custom repository I have come across the need to remove a
> package. Can someone say how I would remove a package from a local
> repository?
There's no tool to do this available yet (I'm actually in the process of
writing it).
With that said, you just
- sik3...@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Stuck a bit further down the road. I added the following packages to
> satisfy some other dependencies and now pkg.depotd crashes on a
> --rebuild.
>
...
> pkg://opensolaris.org/SUNWapr13@1.3.9,5.11-0.133:20100216T061634Z
> Traceback (most recent ca
On 03/ 2/11 06:51 AM, Andre Lue wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the reply. The cmd below returns
pkg install -nv SUNWcs@0.5.11,5.11-0.134
consolidation/osnet/osnet-incorporation@0.5.11,5.11-0.134 system/library
library/zlib system/zones library/libxml2 system/kernel library/math
runtime/perl-584
On 03/ 1/11 03:40 PM, Andre Lue wrote:
Hi Shawn,
Thanks for the reply. I got a bit further pulling back packages and making own
repository. However I am not sure what is missing at this stage. I have
verified all the requires on this list are in the repo. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
pk
On 02/12/11 04:38 PM, Andre Lue wrote:
if I wish to build an image from openindiana.org, as such
pkg image-create -F -a openindiana.org=http://pkg.openindiana.org/dev /image
doing a package install of
pkg install SUNWcs
returns the error
Creating Plan -pkg: No version of SUNWcsl can be installe
- solar...@gmail.com wrote:
> hello all,
> i recently upgraded from b111 to b134, but i hve a strange problem to
> install new pkgs:
> henry@electre:~$ pfexec pkg install rdesktop
> Creating Plan \Planning for install failed:
> Use -v option for more details
>
>
> pkg: No version of desktop/
On 01/22/11 05:17 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
Any idea what causes this?
Your "cron" job on datsunx
/usr/lib/update-manager/update-refresh.sh
produced the following output:
/usr/lib/python2.6/vendor-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:57:
GtkWarning: could not open display
warnings.warn(str(e), _gtk
On 12/ 8/10 11:23 AM, Mike DeMarco wrote:
When I upgraded from b134 to b151a Songbird hit a bug that makes it play the
second song over and over again. I tried to go into the b134 repository and
download that version but even though I as in the 134 repository my system kept
installing from the
On 12/ 8/10 01:13 PM, Paul Gress wrote:
On 12/ 8/10 02:23 PM, Mike DeMarco wrote:
When I upgraded from b134 to b151a Songbird hit a bug that makes it play the
second song over and over again. I tried to go into the b134 repository and
download that version but even though I as in the 134 rep
On 12/ 2/10 02:51 PM, Timmy Ewell wrote:
Hello again. Just to clarify, I've been researching the answer for the last several months. I'm
guessing the card is too new for Intel to release the source for the driver and the iwlwifi project
is a work around. I normally don't post in forums for help
On 11/30/10 02:07 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/29/10 20:00, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have
On 11/26/10 06:48 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
On 11/23/10 18:42, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The
upgrade I have just done appears to have completed but when booted
show it still on 134b/
No
On 11/29/10 10:19 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
When I login I see several instances of VirtualBox starting. I dont want that.
How can I stop them from booting?
After logging in, close all open windows, and then:
* go to the Applications menu at the top-left corner
* click 'Run Application'
* type
On 11/23/10 09:58 AM, Chris Gerhard wrote:
Is there a way to list packages that are going to cause problems? The upgrade
I have just done appears to have completed but when booted show it still on
134b/
No, because that package system doesn't know what packages are a
"problem". The package
On 11/22/10 04:18 AM, Ken Berry wrote:
Hi Shawn
I am having the similar problem.
laptop at snv-148
use GUI Package Manager
This is an Live Image. The install operation can't be performed
I can OpenConnect or Punchin VPN to Oracle in UK
Where is the best place to find the solution?
In your
On 11/19/10 05:48 PM, Steven Acres wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Shawn Walker mailto:shawn.wal...@oracle.com>> wrote:
On 11/19/10 04:39 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/19/10 04:08 PM, Steven Acres wrote:
...
Specifically for Shawn: Isn't ther
On 11/19/10 04:39 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 11/19/10 04:08 PM, Steven Acres wrote:
...
Specifically for Shawn: Isn't there somewhere that one of these folks
can file a bug report on this? Seems there is a dep resolving issue with
the pkg manager.
Dependency resolution is working exact
On 11/19/10 04:08 PM, Steven Acres wrote:
...
Specifically for Shawn: Isn't there somewhere that one of these folks
can file a bug report on this? Seems there is a dep resolving issue with
the pkg manager.
Dependency resolution is working exactly as it is supposed to.
However, the error messag
On 11/19/10 11:30 AM, Jose Chung wrote:
Hi,
I've got the same problem.
After upgrading to 134b as per the
http://blogs.sun.com/observatory/entry/upgrading_from_opensolaris_2009_06
instructions I've hit a brick wall.
Here's some output;
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TY
On 11/18/10 05:49 AM, Paul Griffith wrote:
FYI
Just for the record, I filed a bug report.
I just installed meld, but it refuses to run, shouldn't Package Manager
pull in any dependencies meld needs to run.
Yes, and it will if the package declares them. It can't install
dependencies it
On 11/17/10 11:51 PM, Willi Burmeister wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to use the Solaris 11 express repository in my local
network without success. Here what I have done:
Depot server
- Updated to Solaris 11 express by hand
% head -1 /etc/release
Oracle Solaris 11 Express
On 11/16/10 11:55 AM, Eli Kleinman wrote:
Hi Shawn and thanks for the help,
I booted back to my old boot environment, below is the output of the new boot
environment.
-
I did a beadm mount sol11-2 /sol11
---
pkg -R /sol11 publisher
PUBLISHER
On 11/16/10 11:37 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
NAME (PUBLISHER) VERSION STATE UFOXI
...
amp-dev 0.5.11-0.111installed -
This is most likely the issue (assuming you've added the 'solaris'
publisher as described
On 11/16/10 10:17 AM, Eli Kleinman wrote:
Please help,
I am trying to upgrade opensolaris b134 to solaris11 express. I followed the Oracle
docs at http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/gklaa?l=en&a=view with no
luck.
Any help is greatly appreciated, below are the steps I tried.
Going from
On 11/16/10 08:06 AM, Chavdar Ivanov wrote:
did you download the repository or connect through
the web?
I have tried both and have problems both ways.
Part B of the repository will not mount up under any
filesystem type. after lofiadm the iso /dev/lofi/1
mount fails with not a hsfs filesystem.
On 11/16/10 01:04 AM, Bruno Damour wrote:
Hello,
In the repository (http://pkg.oracle.com/solaris/release)
I see :
system/x...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061852Z
system/virti...@0.5.11,5.11-0.151.0.1:20101105T061851Z
...
Does that mean that xvm is supported to use solaris 11 express as Dom
On 11/15/10 05:35 PM, Sean M. Brannon wrote:
What is the update/patch policy for Express? i.e. is an Oracle support contract
required to gain access to Solaris 11 Express software/security updates?
Page seven of the release notes refers to accessing information about updates:
For information a
On 11/15/10 11:03 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
interesting would be to know if the upgrade from OS 2009.06 is working well or
not.
Yes, the process is described here and was noted in the release
announcement:
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/821-1479/gklaa?l=en&a=view
-Shawn
___
On 10/ 6/10 07:46 PM, Lincoln Yeoh wrote:
But why do the "fake" version strings differ depending on the tool used? Is
there a translation/conversion I should use for them?
The only version string that's "fake" is the one from "pkginfo". It
differs because it's just placeholder information to
On 10/ 7/10 02:43 AM, chris wrote:
I have been testing nexenta against opensolaris 2009.06 as an iscsi target /
storage repository for Xenserver 5.6 using the same hardware and vm
configuration. The target has two xeon quad-core cpus, 4gb ram and 4 seagate
drives with opensolaris on the first
On 10/ 5/10 04:25 AM, julian wrote:
K, I've managed to run this as the root user now by removing the type=role
entry of the root user, but still get the same error:
"The Wizard could not detect the source files. Exiting"
As another test I tried this on a Centos VM as the root user, and the ins
On 09/29/10 05:20 PM, Bill Shannon wrote:
I upgraded my snv_132 system today. I'm using the Oracle-internal
pkg server mirror so I apologize if this is in an Oracle-internal
problem.
The Update Manager upgraded me to snv_147 even though the latest
version of "entire" available was 149. And it c
On 09/17/10 04:54 PM, devsk wrote:
Somehow I ended up deleting the snv 134 BE that I had. Now, I can't upgrade to
latest images (from openindiana) because it needs 134 as base. I want to
restore the BE from backup, which I had taken some time back. How can I restore
a BE to a workable state? I
On 09/16/10 01:14 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 09/16/10 12:03 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 09/16/10 05:00 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
"Richard L. Hamilton"wrote:
Well..
On 09/16/10 12:03 PM, see...@cise.ufl.edu wrote:
+-- Shawn Walker wrote (Thu, 16-Sep-2010, 10:50 -0700):
|
| The choice to not support sparse zones was a decision made by the zones
| team; not by the packaging team.
Out of curiosity and before I go searching, is the rationale for this
On 09/16/10 12:03 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 09/16/10 05:00 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
Well...there are probably people that prefer for example
* traditional Solaris command set defa
On 09/16/10 11:38 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Calum Benson wrote:
On 16 Sep 2010, at 14:04, Ashish Nabira wrote:
Lets add those important packages to repositories and make OpenIndiana popular
to newbiesThat's one good way to make it popular .
Anyone who wanted to w
On 09/16/10 11:03 AM, Dmitry G. Kozhinov wrote:
...
OpenIndiana project should maintain it's own package repository. Solaris 11
packages may occur incompatible - who knows how Oracle will modify the IPS
system? An will they drop us IPS source code after Solaris 11 is released?
The source for
On 09/16/10 05:00 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
Well...there are probably people that prefer for example
* traditional Solaris command set default vs GNU command set default
This is why few Solaris users did accept Indiana.
Based on what data d
On 08/20/10 09:41 AM, carlopmart wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 08/20/10 03:26 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
...
I can't see any other OS (nor M$ nor OSX) that to be licensed
requires annual support subscription...when you buy Wins or Macs, you
pay once for your license, that's all (
On 08/20/10 09:41 AM, carlopmart wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 08/20/10 03:26 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
...
I can't see any other OS (nor M$ nor OSX) that to be licensed
requires annual support subscription...when you buy Wins or Macs, you
pay once for your license, that's all (
On 08/20/10 03:26 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
...
I can't see any other OS (nor M$ nor OSX) that to be licensed requires annual
support subscription...when you buy Wins or Macs, you pay once for your
license, that's all (unless you really want or need support from M$ or Apple).
RedHat enterpri
On 08/16/10 02:03 PM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi,
I've been traversing the project pages, looking for info on accessing
their respective mercurial gates, but its a slow process.
Is there an authoritative list of the gates hosted on
hg.opensolaris.org that are open to anonymous access?
If you hav
On 08/ 6/10 10:44 AM, Mike DeMarco wrote:
Does anyone know what happened to gone-sound-properties? Is there something
that replaced it? Wanted to configure sound events and can not find anyway to
do it. Same with evolution, unable to play sound file on incoming emails.
So, this seems odd to m
On 07/29/10 04:59 PM, tom60 wrote:
Shawn,
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
opensolaris.org (preferred) origin online http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
# cat /etc/release
Oracle Solaris Next Development snv_143 X86
Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Asse
On 07/29/10 02:33 PM, Tom Chen wrote:
Hello,
I have installed snv137 and snv143. I want to add gcc package through the
package manager. Though I can search the list of gcc related packages from the
publisher - opensolaris.org, the installation of gcc-43, gcc-432 always fails.
The error is "Pr
On 07/24/10 03:51 PM, Rob McMahon wrote:
On 24/07/2010 23:27, Shawn Walker wrote:
The version of pkg(5) that will be part of b144 should deliver
somewhere around a 20% or greater performance improvement in transport
performance when used with a properly configured web and/or depot server.
Do
On 07/24/10 11:55 PM, HeCSa wrote:
...
On 07/24/10 08:23 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
The source is there, and you can build it you know ;)
Alternatively, you could use the bits someone made available on
genunix.org for b142:
http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/README.txt
http://genunix.org/dist
On 07/24/10 04:30 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Can Oracle Engineering provide someone like Joerg what he needs to update his
external SchilliX distro to implement ON snv_145/IPS 13
On 07/24/10 04:25 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
It isn't mean to be in SXCE, so wasn't put there. I think you
misunderstand its purpose.
Maybe IPS was not developed for integration, then I could understand
why it did not appear on SXCE.
IPS w
On 07/24/10 04:17 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/25/10 10:27 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a "Community Distro"
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used remotely from
halfway across the world
On 07/24/10 07:06 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) projec
On 07/24/10 10:08 AM, Stefan Parvu wrote:
"> The only problem I can see in regards to how IPS was introduced that perhaps
more explanation to the community at the project inception about why IPS and
not something else would do good... a little bit more open dialog with the
community before you
On 07/24/10 06:37 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
...
To stir the pot here, since we are discussing a "Community Distro"
as opposed to a SUN/Oracle distro, IPS when used remotely from
halfway across the world has large performance issues. For example
in Bangalore I personally know no one
On 07/23/10 04:41 PM, Ken Gunderson wrote:
Why? IPS was shoved down the community's throat in a heavy handed and
decidedly not FOSS manner.
Sorry, but that's simply not true.
The pkg(5) project has been one of the few projects that is actually
very open. It was the first to use defect.open
On 07/19/10 03:53 AM, andrew wrote:
...
So the big question is: will Solaris Next use IPS packaging? My money is on IPS
packaging but a big fat CPIO-based DVD installation similar to S10 but using
the new Caiman installers from OpenSolaris (local text and graphics-based
installs plus via seria
On 07/19/10 02:50 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
...
If we add the inverted tsort algorith and a default prefix for packages
(e.g. http://schily.net/packages) and if we combine this with ZFS,
is there really something missing?
For those interested in learning more about the depe
On 07/19/10 02:50 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
A packaging system is a packaging system. IPS is nobody's favorite,
but that's better than arguing the merits of rpm vs deb vs BSD ports vs ...
The SVr4 packaging system understands http based URIs
On 07/18/10 04:57 PM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
However, one related thing to keep in mind is that the zone creation and
management mechanisms are now tightly integrated with the image
packaging system. Just as the automated installer is, etc.
Other
On 07/18/10 02:07 AM, Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 12:41 AM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 18:07, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
One of the biggest problems with all of our
community distros is that they are not compatible
with IPS. This problem is further complicated by the
On 07/16/10 01:26 PM, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
...
I like the idea of a minimalist distro, backed by a robust IPS. This is
something which probably should have been started in the first place (instead
of the current IMHO impossible mess).
Now that you mentioned this great idea of putting togethe
On 07/16/10 07:18 AM, Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
...
Thanks again for this feedback. Do you know if the SVR4->IPS conversion tool(s)
are publicly available/open source?
The mass import tool is in the pkg(5) gate here:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/pkg/gate/src/util/distro-import/
...
On 07/14/10 08:39 AM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
dclarke wrote:
I have no love for that python disaster called IPS.
I think that conceptually, IPS is very good. Of course, it's silly to implement
system software in an interpreted language like Python. In time, if OpenSolaris
survives, hopefull
On 07/ 9/10 02:05 PM, Aleksey Cheusov wrote:
I've downloaded osol-dev-134-x86.usb memstick image in order
to install opensolaris on my CD/DVD-less Acer Aspire Revo 3600.
I dd-ed this image to my memory stick but my nettop doesn't boot from
it. file(1) shows the following
/srv/pub/isos/osol-dev-
On 07/ 9/10 11:59 AM, Michael Brzustowicz wrote:
when i search 'dev' for setuptools, something briefly appears and disappears in
the package window ... i think it's setuptools
and i just don't see python-mysql-26 at all, just 24 ...
It would depend on what build of OpenSolaris you currently ha
On 07/ 9/10 10:19 AM, Michael Brzustowicz wrote:
the python-mysql connector "MySQLdb" is in dev repo for python2.4 ONLY!
i download lastest package MySQL-python-1.2.3 and try command line install
python setup.py install
fails because 'setuptools' is apparently not in opensolaris.
Uh, it's there
On 07/ 6/10 08:42 AM, Paul Gress wrote:
On 07/ 6/10 01:13 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 07/ 6/10 04:48 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
Opensolaris and solaris are for servers. Not desktops. Yes you can
use it
for a desktop if you want, but it's not designed for that purpose,
and not
good compared to o
On 06/28/10 09:57 PM, Giovanni wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
2) Support for "new" hardware is still
On 06/ 8/10 03:30 PM, Günther Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to install gcc-4.3.2 through the pkg system.
It seems to do something but I do not see where the actual gcc binary is
installed.
I'm using OSOL 2009.06
To determine what files an *installed* package delivers, you can use pkg
conten
On 06/ 7/10 10:58 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
devsk wrote:
is updated on Jun 2nd this year (hehe..) and it has 24000+ packages, whereas the
"dev" one is updated in March this year and has about 4000 packages?
I believe that's because /dev is running a newer version that reports
the more inter
On 06/ 7/10 10:35 AM, Rob Nelson wrote:
Seems to be a problem with http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/. I am having this
problem on multiple systems. --full has same issue:
r...@gb4000-04:# pkg refresh --full
Caching catalogs ...
An error was encountered while attempting to read image state info
On 06/ 5/10 12:16 PM, Attila Nagy wrote:
Aha, thanks for the info!
I suspect this is by design so, am I right?
Correct.
Does this worth an RFE?
I understand that this feature can/may cause troubles (only if used, of course
:)), but - if used with caution, and, say a zfs snapshot :) - could
On 06/ 5/10 07:22 AM, Attila Nagy wrote:
Hi all,
I hit some bug in libtheora.
I use recordmysolaris quite frequently, and libtheoraenc.so 1.1.2 (that's the
current version if I recall correctly) encodes the uncompressed file badly into
ogv.
I'm on sxce (125), so I popped in an earlier dvd (117
On 06/ 1/10 10:20 AM, Erik Trimble wrote:
On 6/1/2010 9:19 AM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 06/ 1/10 05:39 AM, Brandon Hume wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the
DNS server couldn't reverse resolve the IP i
On 06/ 1/10 05:39 AM, Brandon Hume wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:22 -0700, lance tan wrote:
When I login to osol from another host in the LAN, obviously, the DNS server
couldn't reverse resolve the IP inside the LAN. But there is no way to disable
DNS reverse lookup by SunSSH.
No, but you
On 05/30/10 03:25 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Mike Gerdts wrote:
Could it be because "pkg image update" is known to work pretty well
going forward (b134 -> b134b) but is known not to work well or is
untested for going backward (b142 -> b134b)?
pkg is known not to work at all for installing b
[moving to pkg-discuss]
On 05/19/10 05:04 PM, Antoine Benkemoun wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to update an OpenSolaris 2009.06 Xen VM (dom0 is Debian
Lenny) from build 111 to 134. It is incredibly slow, you can't even
imagine...
Yesterday, I started the process at 11PM and at 6PM today it crashed
On 05/20/10 04:46 AM, Adil Mujeeb wrote:
HI,
I was going through OpenSolaris develoeps reference and read about Proto Area.
It has been mentioned that:-
You can generate protolists with the protolist command, which does not include
a man page. Its invocation is as follows:
$ protolist
But the
On 05/17/10 06:06 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> Is this simply web page maintenance, or is it a closed door?
Wow, it was there this morning. I just went and looked at
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/
... all those links go to the web grave yard. Very odd.
The Solaris 10 HCL has the sam
On 04/29/10 08:41 AM, solarg wrote:
hello all,
on my os20xx.xx, b134, i'm unable to add a publisher:
$ pfexec pkg set-publisher -O http://ips.enst.fr ips.enst.fr
it hangs:
$ pfexec truss -p 2251
lwp_mutex_timedlock(0xFCC3, 0x, 0xFEE12A00) (sleeping...)
it's not the first time i had
On 05/ 5/10 10:42 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 03:16 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
...
There's an RFE open to have the client be able to perform the
'download only' part of installs and updates, but it hasn't yet been
implemented.
OK, thanks. I hope it's getting atte
On 05/ 5/10 09:53 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 02:46 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/ 5/10 06:56 PM, Jim Mills wrote:
Thanks, Alan.
I was hoping to find a link where I can download individual packages.
The repo on a stick sounds like a good idea but it's really not what
I want. I
On 05/ 5/10 06:56 PM, Jim Mills wrote:
Thanks, Alan.
I was hoping to find a link where I can download individual packages. The repo
on a stick sounds like a good idea but it's really not what I want. I need
about 20 packages installed (locally) and have been able to download about 25%
of what
1 - 100 of 1553 matches
Mail list logo
