<*And* when the crontab/at commands are run.>
Which restarts cron unless there were no changes made, it which case crontab is
not read
--ron.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensola
Solaris 10 does not include top. It can be downloaded from sunfreeware.com.
Solaris 11 has top in /bin/top (32 bit) and /usr/bin/amd64/top (64 bit). pkg
search top in Solaris 11 will show you the locations.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Cron only reads the crontab file when it starts. Man cron and search for
'examines'. As you found out, sending a HUP doesn't work. Since cron runs as a
SMF controlled service in Solaris 10, killing the process will cause SMF to
restart it. The crontab file will then be read and changes, if any,
I assume the command you are trying is "ipfilter" which does not exist. Try the
man page for ipfilter (the software package) and ipf (the command). The
firewall is installed but not enabled by default. The man pages explains this.
Time to do your own homework.
--ron
--
This message posted from
Try using the option 'anon=0'
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Try this:
message=`/usr/sbin/zfs list -r tank`
echo "Subject: filez ZFS Information\n\n"${message}| mail filez at nebol dot se
That is curly braces around $message in the echo statement.
---ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolar
I don't know what the root=. is for. To allow root access, use:
anon=0 (zero)
That way, user 65535 (anonymous) becomes root.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Will there be a OpenSolaris Nevada sxce snv_130 or is it dead?
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> How does this relate to opensolaris at all?
>
> If Outlook/Entourage or office applications are a
> requirement for your organization, then your only
> choices are Windows and Mac OSX. No linux or
> solaris. Although you can use some products that try
> to duplicate the functionality of Outloo
Thank you. The fix was to add dev=`echo $dev | sed 's/mirror.*/mirror/'` after
line 238) to
/usr/lib/lu/lulib
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I upgraded SUNWluu, lur and lucfg from the snv_127 media. When I luactivate the
new BE, I get the following:
sudo luactivate -n snv_127
System has findroot enabled GRUB
ERROR: Unable to determine the configuration of the current boot environment
.
$
Any ideas?
--ron
--
This message posted fro
"In that case, you can add it again as follows:" ???
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The link is no good.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The above should read:
> auth.notice /var/adm/authlog
Verify that /etc/syslog.conf uses TABS and not spaces
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Another poster posted this. It worked for me.
yes | pkgrm SUNWlucfg SUNWlur SUNWluu SUNWluzone
and then
# yes | pkgadd -d /media/SOL_11_X86/Solaris_11/Product SUNWlucfg SUNWlur
SUNWluu SUNWluzone
In your case, the mountpoint is /mnt
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Johnny,
I don't know if they still do it but older sparc machines would force the same
mac address on all nics in the machine. There is an OBP variable that will undo
this feature and allow the router to pass the ICMP response. From Sun's OBP
command reference:
local-mac-address? false (defau
You can also force a text installation (option 1 I believe).
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Alan,
Are you referring to "When the OpenSolaris Live CD is booted under VirtualBox,
the
Xorg server is not started automatically."? I have no problem booting from the
iso in VirtualBox and installing to hard disk. Its booting from the hard disk
that is giving me the problem.
Please note, I am
Thanks Artem but no joy here. Did as you did and it still doesn't work. Yes, I
have cpu virtualization. Windows Xp and Ubuntu guests work fine. There are no
obvious errors in Xorg.0.log. Since I put the xorg.conf file in place,
avahi-bridge-dsd goes into maintenance when the guest is booted.
Th
Guest: OS2009.06 snv_117 (Indiana)
Virtual Box: 3.0.0 r49315
Host: SXCE snv_117 (Nevada)
VB 3.0 Guest Additions are installed. All services are online, both host and
guest. I get a text login prompt. I logged in and checked to see if gdm is
running, it is. This has been the case
On the download center, there is only 1 file available:
Solaris Express Build 116 DVD (Segment 1 of 2)
sol-nv-b116-x86-dvd-iso-a.zip 1,623.62 MB
Where's the beef?
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mail
Try http://www.memtest.org/
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> You can just type in the command:
>
> su
>
> at the command prompt and hit the "enter" key and
> then type in the root password (the root password,
> not your regular user password) and become root. It's
> a pretty standard thing that is available on every
> unix like system. Once you are root
I have just installed snv_115 and am noticing a maddening change. When I single
left click on an application icon, the app runs instead of being selected. When
I single click on an email in the preview page, the email opens in a new window.
In other words, a single mouse click is interpreted as
is problem some time ago.
Lots of "check this, how much that" but no fix.
--ron
> You can check the status of gdm with "svcs -xv gdm"
>
> Regards,
>
> Jedy
> On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 15:18 -0700, Ron Halstead
> wrote:
> > Guest OS is OpenSolaris
2GB
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Guest OS is OpenSolaris 2009.06 on VirtualBox 2.2.4 on Opensolaris snv_114 host.
After the text login prompts, The following error is displayed:
svc.startd[7]: system/avahi-bridge-dsd:default failed fatally: transitioned to
maintenance
(see 'svcs -xv' for details)
The avahi-bridge-dsd log shows
In the document, it spells out how to run opensolaris in VirtualBox on Windows,
Lu=inux and MacOS but not on OpenSolaris- Nevada. Just a nit.
On a related note, I installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 (111a) on VirtualBox 2.2.0
on OpenSolaris nv_112. The installation went well, but it won't boot. The
S
coitran , the window manager metacity is not running. Same thing
happened to me. The workaround is to start an xterm or gnome terminal and type
the folloing in it:
/bin/metacity --replace &
This will start the window manager and give you the bells and whistles. I even
put the command
Try mailx -v -s "should go through" root
body
.
The -v is verbose and will show you what is going on.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The Gnome / X not starting and the APIC error are not related. A couple of
builds ago (now at 111), Alan C told me that there were some fonts missing in
gnome which caused the X problem. I tried his fix and it has been working since
then. I understand the fix was in snv_110.
The APIC thing is a
Bad memory? It happens. Run memtest86+. Let it run for a few hours.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm getting the following console message during boot on snv_109 and snv_110.
Does anyone know what it means, is there a cure, should I even care?
APIC Error interrupt on CPU 0. Status 0 = 0, Status 1 = 80
APIC Error interrupt on CPU 1. Status 0 = 0, Status 1 = 80
I tried /etc/system: set pcplus
To the 'genius' who pared down the shutdown process in snv_110, well done. I
read your writeup in the bug report / CR and thought, "if he can only pull this
off". My machine now shuts down in 13 seconds, down from > 60 and it doesn't
hang up on unmounting automounted zfs file systems.
Thank you
I believe (but am not sure) that it is being worked on.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have had the same problem on snv_109. I use autofs to mount home directories
from a zpool. Last night I tried unmounting the home directory because of what
I read on another thread. init 5 worked like it is supposed to and the machine
powered off.
Log off as yourself.
Log in as root.
zfs umou
The above is correct but don't make the mistake a few people make. The entry in
/etc/passwd is still /home/username, not /export/home/username.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@op
Any idea what this is? I'm seeing it on it on nv98 and 99. The process number
varies but the lock is always 8192.
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Ron Halstead wrote:
> > In opensolaris snv_98 and snv_99, lucreate does not
> put an entry for the new BE in menu.lst.
> >
>
> What about luactivate?
>
> Ian
>
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
>
In opensolaris snv_98 and snv_99, lucreate does not put an entry for the new BE
in menu.lst.
lucreate -c snv_99 -n snv_100 (I'm optimistic). This happened in 98 when I
wanted to Live Upgrade to 99. I had to do a fresh install. I tried it in 99 and
the same problem. I hope this gets fixed as I ha
"Not now, but:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2008092402/";
The xorg.tar.gz, when gunzipped and untared results in "tar: directory checksum
error"
--ron
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailin
I assume the zpool is on a second disk(s). If so, zpool export pool, do the
installation of _95 and zpool import pool. Your data will be safe even if you
don't export the pool, but, I'm paranoid. I used to do it that way before I
decided to try Live Upgrade.
--ron
This message posted from o
I love a good GUI. Web browsing looks better than lynx, and I can open up
multiple xterms and work on multiple command lines at the same time. The only
GUI tool I use is printmgr because lpadmin syntax sucks. I've been a SysAdmin
since before the GUI and really would not miss it if it went away.
palace:$ uname -r
5.11
palace:$ sudo pkgchk -l -p /usr/lib/smbsrv/libsmb_passwd.so
palace:$
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
oops! my bad. thanks.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> FYI - Build 85 is supposed to be released in the
> next few hours.
> >
> > Do you know if there has been any change to the
> SDLC ?
> > If you don't know ... that's cool. Just asking.
>
> Regarding 'wget'? It's still no there.
>
> They reviewed a number of potential
ux-admin wrote:
"Should the root's shell be changed to bash? Definitely not. ksh, fine, if it
must be; ksh93, fine; tcsh, fine; zsh, fine. But can we please kill the bash
abomination on Solaris, and wean users off of it?"
This 'my shell is better than your shell' flame war has been going on for
waynel, try http://bhami.com/rosetta.html
dennis, no, not too much. I just loved the detail.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Dennis,
I must remember not to ask you the time. ; )
Nice response.
--ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
+1. Please add me to the list. We use Cisco VPN access in my company and I do
hate to haul a Windows XP laptop home just to use that version of VPN client. I
have 2 x86 Solaris boxes at home that I would prefer to use.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I have to agree with Andrew. I've been doing this for many years. While I do
not dislike change, I do like options, particularly the option to lay out the
disk the way I like it. You have many good reasons to use a whole disk root,
but should your reasons dictate my options? I think not.
-ron
In the smb.conf file, did you change the workgroup = MYGROUP to the domain that
the Mac is in?
-ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We have had the same problem. This is what I found via google:
The following command allows access from remote clients.
Show properties
svcprop svc:/application/x11/x11-server
Turn on tcp listen
svccfg -s svc:/application/x11/x11-server setprop options/tcp_listen = true
Then restart the X server
I'm running build 70 but this has been happening since build 68(?). During
boot, I get the following:
WARNING: out of I/O resources on bridge: bus 0x0, dev 0x1c, func 0x0, for
secondary bus 0x2
WARNING: devices under bridge bus 0x0, dev 0x1c, func 0x0 will not be assigned
I/O ports
WARNING: c
I like the Las Vegas idea ; -)
ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Casper said "Let me add that if colorls becomes the default and needs to be
undone,
I will hunt down and kill the person responsible."
I'll hold him while you hit him.
Ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing lis
Where?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I had a problem with video on NV_59 also. I fixed it by downloading and
installing the driver from Nvidia. Can you please provide a link to the "svccfg
command per Alanc's tutorial".
Thanks,
Ron Halstead
This message posted from
The subject says it all. Its been a month since the last one and I can't wait
to get my printer working again.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ry of the steps. Your description of
what is needed to solve Ulrich's problem caught my eye and triggered this
request. I can be reached at rdhalstead at comcast dot net. Thank you.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
o
one.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You get my vote. Thanks.
Ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Sorry,
Dennis, not David (long day!)
Ron
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks David,
I hope you don't mind, I "borrowed" it for my desktop. Looks very kool.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
th an upgrade. Thanks to
all for your interest and commenst.
Ron Halstead
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
"Often, slow response time is a symptom of broken name servers --
missing IN PTR records for the addresses in use, for instance. Using
nslookup or dig to probe those out might be helpful"
As I said in my original post, I am pinging a host, sol10, which is on my local
LAN and is in /etc/hosts. Why
, 0x, 0x) = 0xFFBFFEFF [0x]
lwp_sigmask(SIG_SETMASK, 0x, 0x) = 0xFFBFFEFF [0x]
sol10 is alive
write(1, " s o l 1 0 i s a l i".., 15) = 15
alarm(0) = 0
_exit(0
Can the SMF GUI tool be incorporated into the current Java Web Console that
allows GUIized ZFSadministration? One tool - many uses.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
68 matches
Mail list logo
