On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:37 AM, Karel Gardas wrote:
> Hello,
> thanks for your reply. I'm trying to reproduce the same error on vanilla
> 2010.11 installation and to my surprise I'm not able to. What I need to do is:
>
> export PATH=/usr/xpg4/bin:$PATH
>
> and then I'm able to reproduce this err
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
[snip]
> My impression is that a number of the AST tools have picked up the
> major options previously unique to the GNU tools, while trying to retain
> better standards compliance. Assuming that to be true, I think they'd
> be the way
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 3:15 PM, Dave Johnson
wrote:
[snip]
> Here is the evidence:
>
> Evidence 1:
> - Project cooperation with ksh project withdrawn
> - GNU commands as replacements are the future
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: John Sonnenschein
> Date: Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at
Robert Thurlow wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> > Ok... does that mean that I have to create a ZFS filesystem to actually
> > test ([1]) an application which modifies ZFS/NFSv4 ACLs or are there any
> > other options ?
>
> By all means, test with ZFS. But it's
Ian Collins wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Norm Jacobs wrote:
> >> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>> Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> >>> "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> &g
Norm Jacobs wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
> > "yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
> > etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
>
> I have some vague recollection t
Hi!
Does anyone know out-of-the-head whether tmpfs supports ACLs - and if
"yes" - which type(s) of ACLs (e.g. NFSv4/ZFS, old POSIX draft ACLs
etc.) are supported by tmpfs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.ma...@nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Su
Hi!
2009-08-22: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris >= B110 i386 or SPARC installation
and provide ksh93t+_20090505 and the content described in P
Al Hopper wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Al Hopper
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Al Hopper
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Roland Mainz
> > > wrote:
> > > > Does anyone know what's wrong with
&g
Hi!
2009-07-02: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris >= B110 i386 or SPARC installation
and provide ksh93t+_20090505 and the content described in P
Hi!
2009-05-11: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris >= B110 i386 or SPARC
installation and provide ksh93t+_20090505 and the content
described in P
Hi!
2009-04-20: ksh93-integration update 2 tarballs for Solaris 11
Nevada+OpenSolaris/Indiana
These tarballs ([2]) are intended to be installed over an existing
Solaris Nevada/Indiana/OpenSolaris >= B110 i386 or SPARC
installation and provide ksh93t+_20090310 and the content
described in P
Miles Nordin wrote:
> > You wish to talk to Roland Mainz, Glenn Fowler and
> > Jennifer Pioch
> > then. They have opensource replacements for
> > /usr/bin/sed,
> > /usr/xpg4/bin/sed, /usr/bin/tail, /usr/xpg4/bin/tail,
> > /usr/bin/tr and
> > /usr/xpg4/bi
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Josh Hurst wrote:
> > On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke wrote:
[snip]
> Flame wars should be fought privately, if at all.
* First:
I would _STRONGLY_ prefer to keep all non-technical issues (including
politics, license discussions, personal issue
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Another issue: Xsun did use mmap() to allocate bigger parts of memory in the
> > X server. If big memory leaking program like netscape died in former times,
> > Xsun did shrink. Today, we have firefox that itself allocates less memory
> > than
>
Hi!
Irek: I'm setting the Reply-To: to opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
... I would be really nice to keep the "stone throwing" out of the
ksh93-integration-disc...@opensolars.org list - we're trying to get
technical stuff done in this list and not rant about the history of
Solaris or th
ken mays wrote:
[snip]
> > Mark Martin wrote:
[snip]
> > Assuming you only use UFS and cut-down some system
> > tuneables Solaris can
> > run on a 64MB machine (my Ultra5 only has 128MB now after
> > one of the
> > DIMMs failed and it still works fine with CDE). The
> > problems start if
> > you wa
Mark Martin wrote:
>
> [Resent for Reply-all]
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 6:03 PM, Martin Bochnig
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Except that it would be nice if somebody would make the
> Polaris port functional, before starting a new port.
> Also, why MIPS, not ARM? Isn't MIPS dead a
Hi!
Does anyone remeber a component of Solaris (OS/Netm SFWNV, Studio or
punchin) which produces the following kind of "at" jobs:
-- snip --
>From r...@terror.alquiekquak.org Tue Dec 16 00:00:55 2008
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 00:00:53 +0100 (CET)
From: Super-User
To: r...@terror.alquiekquak.o
Cyril Plisko wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Al Hopper wrote:
> >>
> >> PS: belenix.org runs on genunix.org infrastructure but is running on
> >> other hardware and is unaffected by this outage.
>
Al Hopper wrote:
>
> Please bear with us as we find/fix the hardware issues currently
> causing "constipation" at www.genunix.org. Wiki users - don't worry -
> we have current backups. But please allow at least 12 hours for the
> site to be restored to normal operation.
>
> I guess our uptime r
Hi!
2008-11-14: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
>= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ast-ksh.2008-11-04
>(ksh93t_20081104) and match PSARC/2008/094 ("ksh93 Update 1" ;
>http://www.opensola
Hi!
2008-08-10: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
>= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ast-ksh.2008-07-25
>(ksh93t_20080725) and match PSARC/2008/094 ("ksh93 Update 1" ;
>http://www.opensolar
Ian Collins wrote:
> Herschel Krustofsky writes:
> > I agree completely with Bruno, getting the distribution out there properly
> > is a showstopper.
> >
> This subject comes up over and over (and has for years) and the answer
> remains the same.
>
> Why do you think Indiana was created?
AFAIK t
"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
[snip]
> > Hmmm... that'd be a close shave. Having worked with
> > UltraSPARC T2s quite a bit, I'd say that the T2 is
> > still pretty weak for the desktop workloads,
> > precisely because of his single-thread performance.
> > You'd have to have software that was highly
Kathy Slattery wrote:
> > > Currently, I'm using a customized version of Epic
> > to author the
> > > book. The source isn't available yet, but I plan to
> > move it into
> > > mercurial after the August 8th release.
> >
> > May I ask for any links to that soft, google search
> > does not give my a
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ming Kin Lai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted
> > its resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I
> > guess.
> > So, can I discuss things about So
Hi!
2008-06-24: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada >= B84+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing
OpenSolaris >= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide
ksh93t-_20080614 and match PSARC/2008/094 ("ksh93 Update 1" ;
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/communi
Hi!
2008-06-17: ksh93 update tarballs for Solaris Nevada+Indiana
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
>= B84 i386 or SPARC installation and provide ksh93t-_20080614 and match
>PSARC/2008/094 ("ksh93 Update 1" ;
>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/
On 5/8/08, Silveira Neto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Put colors for bash:
> http://silveiraneto.net/2008/05/07/terminal-with-colors-in-opensolaris/
> Edit ~/.bashrc and insert in the end:
>
> alias ls='ls –color=auto'
> reopen your terminal and you got colors.
>
> I could not find the global bashr
Gary Winiger wrote:
>
> --
> X-Sun-Data-Type: text
> X-Sun-Data-Description: text
> X-Sun-Data-Name: text
> X-Sun-Charset: us-ascii
> X-Sun-Content-Lines: 8
>
> > It's done! :-)
> >
> > See attached commit notification email. "Flag day" notification is
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/co
Dirk Wetter wrote:
> Am 10.03.2008 09:51, Joep Vesseur schrieb:
> > On 03/10/08 01:41, Roland Mainz wrote:
> >> Is there any status update ? Did you hit any major problems ?
> >
> > On the list for integration any time now (I can't say which build since I'm
Hi!
More or less an update to my original "VMware's rock around the
clock..."-posting
(http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2006-March/013848.html):
1. In Solaris 11 B83a and B84 the VMware tools no longer sync the time
with the host OS (I'm not using "ntpdate" to slew
Hi!
2008-02-29: ksh93 update tarballs for OpenSolaris
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
>= B72 + Indiana distribution i386 or SPARC installation and provide
>ksh93s+_20080202 (the content matches PSARC/2008/094
>(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/commun
Moritz Willers wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2008, at 22:59, Derek Cicero wrote:
> > Please find the links to SXCE Build 81 at
> >
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/on/
> >
> > /IMPORTANT:/
> >
> > The SDLC has changed how the downloads works.
> >
> > Now you choose the Platform first and t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> The ksh93/bash holy war is off-topic for pkg-discuss.
>
> This list is for the discussion of the development of the packaging system.
>
> Indiana-discuss, or perhaps alt.fetish on USENET, would be a better
> forum for this thread.
Or just "remind" people (either via
Hi!
2007-11-05: ksh93 _update tarballs_ for OpenSolaris >= B72
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPARC installation (>= Nevada B72) to update the provided ksh93
installation to ksh93sü_20071101.
Note that the binaries are provided for testing
Glynn Foster wrote:
>
> I'm very pleased to announce that the first milestone of Project Indiana is
> now
> available - called OpenSolaris Developer Preview.
>
> It's available for download at
>
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/indiana/downloads/current/in-preview.iso
[snip]
Congrats to all! :-)
I
Hi!
[If you run Solaris 11 >= B72 please ignore this]
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-10-31/
These tarballs are intended to be
Hi!
Just curious: Would be there any interest to create a sendmail and/or
mail-related community or project which bundles all the sendmail&&mail
tool activities (e.g. sendmail maintaince, updates, mailx things,
building a "managing sendmail on Solaris (+SMF)" FAQ etc. (the idea came
up toda
Brandorr wrote:
> On 9/28/07, nospam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OLPC (One Laptop Per Child) project had released XO Laptops for the public
> > using G1G1 ("Buy 2 Get 1").
> > One laptop will be sent to the buyer, another laptop will be sent to a
> > child in developing country.
> >
> > Unfort
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
> feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
> machine...
... does anyone have a M4000 or M5000 around to test this, please ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.
Hi!
Does anyone here run Solaris 11/Nevada B72 on a M4000 ? I need some
feedback whether it runs (more or less) stable on that type of
machine...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ T
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> UNIX admin wrote:
> > In fact, Sun, under this agreement has access to all and
> > any Microsoft technology, and is free to implement that
> > technology in Solaris in any way Sun pleases!
>
> I've never seen the agreement, and I'm sure anyone who has will not
> be commen
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Does anyone know whether bugs.opensolaris.org is "sick" again ? I'm
> missing two bug reports:
> 1. DTrace causes system hang
>
> and
>
> 2. DTrace ksh scripts
>
> Can anyone please check what happened to these bugs ?
Erm... did
Hi!
Does anyone know whether bugs.opensolaris.org is "sick" again ? I'm
missing two bug reports:
1. DTrace causes system hang
and
2. DTrace ksh scripts
Can anyone please check what happened to these bugs ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/_
ecord name is '%s'\n" "${recordname}"
typeset url_host="opensolaris.pastebin.ca"
typeset url_path="/raw/${recordname}"
typeset url="http://${url_host}${url_path}";
# I hereby curse Solaris for not having an entry for "http
;Host: ${url_host}\n"
request+="Authorization: Basic $(encode_http_basic_auth "${SHTWITTER_USER}"
"${SHTWITTER_PASSWD}")=\n"
request+="User-Agent: ${http_user_agent}\n"
request+="Connection: close\n"
request+="Content-Type: applic
Hi!
Does anyone know what may currently be wrong with
http://src.opensolaris.org/ ?
New sources like
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/lib/libshell/common/
are sometimes available, sometimes they disappear, then they appear
again and then they disappear again (an
John Levon wrote:
>
> New binaries and sources are available for the OpenSolaris on Xen project. For
> more details:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/levon/entry/solaris_xen_update
Is there anywhere a webrev for the changes ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-07-14/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPAR
Andy Tucker wrote:
>
> On 3/6/06, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm hitting some problems with Solaris guest installations in VMware
> > (e.g. Solaris being the guest in a VMware VM):
> > Sometimes the clock is going out-of-sync. I configured &qu
Dev Mazumdar wrote:
> The rumors are true, we're planning on open sourcing Open Sound (on June
> 14th). We will be offering the source code under CDDL to Solaris and GPLv2
> for Linux BSD, OpenServer etc.
>
> At this time, we'd like to propose that Open Sound be started as a project
> under the
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> William James wrote:
> > No one from Sun's compiler team did bother to respond to my emails.
> > They may not care about good customer support but I do. I think the
> > best way is now to move forward and create a mailing list at
> > opensolaris.org
>
> The most logical p
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
>
> > somehow this feels not good that "products" start to have blogs
>
> It can be interesting to meet real people behind a product share their
> views from the other side of the fence.
Right... and I don't disagree with that... but somehow the idea that
"products" sta
"W. Wayne Liauh" wrote:
> > Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/
> > and
> > http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not
> > thought as offense
> > against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK
> > group/project blogs should
> > be in the project-specific blogging areas at
> > opens
Hi!
Today I stumbled over http://blogs.sun.com/olympus/ and
http://blogs.sun.com/samqfs/ (erm, this is not thought as offense
against the QFS or Olympus people but AFAIK group/project blogs should
be in the project-specific blogging areas at opensolaris.org and not at
blogs.sun.com) ... som
Ted Pogue wrote:
>
> Project Overview:
>
> I propose the creation of a project on opensolaris.org, to bring to the
> community Solaris host-based data services; namely the Storage Archive
> Manager or SAM and the Solaris shared file system QFS. These data
> services exist today and are di
Hi!
[Sorry for the repost but the original annoucement had a few dates/etc.
wrong... ;-( ]
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-04-19
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-04-19/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPAR
LingBo Tang wrote:
>
> This mail has been posted in virtual console discussion alias. The
> broadcasting is for those who may be interested in this feature on solaris.
>
> The new release for "Virtual Console" is available now, you can download
> and try for fun:
> http://opensolaris.org/os/proje
Hi!
Is it possible that bugs.opensolaris.org is loosing bugs (again) ?
I am missing two bug reports:
1. "usr/src/cmd/perl/ build installs Subversion directories (.svn) in
the proto area" (note that this is not the exact title). That one was
filed seveal days ago and since noone f
Hi!
Just a quick announcement that the "shell" project is now open.
What are we are doing ?
The "shell project" should investigate and execute
improvements related to shells and the shell environment in
(Open-)Solaris:
* Improve usuablity for plain users, including beginners
and ad
Hi!
My Solaris 11/B48 Ultra5 sometimes (while doing lots of disk I/O) hangs
for a few seconds and then recovers while logging the following lines to
/var/adm/messages
-- snip --
$ tail /var/adm/messages
Apr 2 02:50:37 jupiterb48 uata: [ID 464412 kern.warning] WARNING:
timeout: reset target
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s_final_20070111 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-03-18/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPAR
or any of the other related issues. We're now working on getting
ksh93 integrated into (Open-)Solaris and trying to leave the old
problems behind us.
Thanks! :-)
John Plocher wrote:
> Josh Hurst wrote:
> > WIll Sun FIX dtksh? Both experts in this field - David Korn and Roland
Mike Kupfer wrote:
>
> > "Eric" == Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Eric> ... In fact Gmane already is carrying some opensolaris lists (I
> Eric> don't know the who/when/why)...
>
> There should be some discussion of this in the opensolaris-discuss
> archives for July 2005 ("g
"Laszlo (Laca) Peter" wrote:
> So the /usr/gnu proposal[1] was approved by PSARC. Obviously, the
> reason for defining /usr/gnu wasn't theoretical -- it allows moving
> GNU packages from /usr/sfw to /usr or /usr/gnu and it helps us
> integrating more GNU packages into Solaris. We have already see
James Carlson wrote:
> Tom Haynes writes:
> > Are there any legal ramifications in open sourcing the le(7D) driver?
[snip]
> - whether the code itself was based on either code or information
> (such as hardware manufacturer documentation) that is itself
> encumbered.
>
> As well as poten
Alan Burlison wrote:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > Not easily, no. I'll look at the moderation idea, but the
> > "subscribers only" request contradicts the aims of most legitimate
> > forum posters.
>
> Another alternative would be to moderate the first few posts from new
> registrants. This s
Stephen Hahn wrote:
>
> * Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-18 15:10]:
> > Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
> > it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
> > subscribed to that list or ma
Hi!
Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued for
moderation by the list admins automatically ?
Original Messa
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Doug Scott wrote:
> > Thanks for the explanation. This explains what is happening to
> > firefox. Is Xorg
> > looking into the problem, as it can be a real pain having to restart X
> > every so often.
>
> I don't know of anyone at X.Org looking into the problem since i
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > ken mays wrote:
[snip]
> >> 5. Support for PowerPC G4 to G5 (PPC750GX)
> >
> > Will Apple G3 machines still be supported ?
>
> probably not for a lng time
Why (I still have the chance to get an older Apple G3-based IMac...
question is whether it makes sense to buy i
Eric Enright wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Michelle Olson wrote:
> > > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> > > I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> > > are more folks who pref
Bruno Jargot wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you. I will ask the
> > gatekeeper to make this change if there are more folks who prefer gzip to
> > bzip2--you are the first to ask.
>
> I think it's better to stic
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Michelle Olson wrote:
> > Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> > I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> > are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the
> > first to ask.
>
> My personal preference is for bzip2 - but that's just ca
Michelle Olson wrote:
> Thanks for this message, really good to hear from you.
> I will ask the gatekeeper to make this change if there
> are more folks who prefer gzip to bzip2--you are the first to ask.
What about providing both gzip and bzip2 tarballs ?
Bye,
Roland
P.S.: Would it be pos
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> >I vote to use bzip2 to compress all the developer sources... usually the
> >disks are slower than uncompressing the tarball anyway...
>
> Not if the uncompressed archives are bigger than, say, 100MB.
> Try it out on a U60 wit
ken mays wrote:
>
> What is the status of the Opensolaris Power PC port?
> Is the project
> still active? There were not any status reports or
> updates in the last
> months.
>
> Bruno
> -
>
> Cyril, PPC for Solaris community lead, can best answer
> that quest
Eric Enright wrote:
> On 1/29/07, Bruno Jargot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 1/29/07, Michelle Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi Rich,
[snip]
> Waiting a little extra time to receive the archive is far better than
> waiting a lot of extra time to unpack it.
Offtopic: Both gzip and bzip
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Rich Teer wrote:
> >On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
> >
> >>I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
> >>bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
> >>backwards. Really.
> >
> >I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I d
Rich Teer wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, Bruno Jargot wrote:
> > I think it's better to stick with bzip2 archives. They need less
> > bandwidth and less room on disks. Using gzip again would be a step
> > backwards. Really.
>
> I resepctfully disagree. Casper and I discussed this ages ago (I
> for
Ienup Sung wrote:
>
> Yes, we have numerous locales with different codesets. Solaris 10,
> as an example, we have 165 locales with 23 different codesets.
> In many cases, codesets use quite similar representation forms and yet
> the mappings between the code point values and actual characters/glyp
Hi!
Does anyone know when the B56 sources will be released ? Seems that this
may be the version we'll pick for final code review of the
ksh93-integration tree...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
Holger Berger wrote:
>
> On 1/17/07, Eric Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Need clarification please. Are John Sonnenschein and Roland Mainz
> > co-owners of the KDE proposal now?
>
> I remember the day when it was considered 'impossible' to conv
John Sonnenschein wrote:
>
> Following the official proposal guidelines, I'd like to take this opportunity
> to propose that we collaborate with the KDE e.V. and kde-core-devel in order
> to integrate KDE as an OpenSolaris project
Ok, lets refine this proposal:
1. Deliver KDE3 to /usr/kde3/ and
Hi!
[Ok... this may be horrible offtopic for OpenSolaris... but maybe there
are some people who played around with "Roller" (which runs
http://bugs.sun.com) and other Blog engines and may be able to help]
Does anyone have a recommendation for a blogging engine which accepts
DocBook/XML as
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
> > "user_attr" and "publickey" from a shell script (if not I would propose
> > to add a extension to "getent") ?
>
> publ
James Carlson wrote:
> Peter C. Norton writes:
> > I think he wants to be able to add a flag, i.e. -nssvc nis, -nssvc
> > dns, -nssvc 'ldap', etc. to getent that will dlopen the appropriate
> > nss_blah library instead of following the lookup in nsswitch.conf so
> > that the lookup to a particular
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
[snip]
> "Normal" users with limited privileges may naturally have no - or
> limited - access.
> Didn't you find any help in the man pages for NIS, NIS+ and LDAP?
That was not the goal. The matching scripts should be able to
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> >Peter C. Norton wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 02:59:55AM +0100, Martin Bochnig wrote:
[snip]
> >>How does nisinit get names from dns even if your system is set to
> >>resolve via NIS+?
>
> Maybe you mean, Roland would want to clone the methods
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> >Martin Bochnig wrote:
> >>>Maybe getuserattr() or getauthattr() ?
> >
> >Plus getpublickey()
> >
> >Or don't those work with "files" as NS ??
> >
> >*shrug*
>
> Exclusively from a shell script, no C?
Yes...
> Can't you analyse the files in /etc di
Martin Bochnig wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
> >Roland Mainz wrote:
> >>Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
> >>"user_attr" and "publickey" from a shell script (if not I would propose
> >>to add a extension
Hi!
Is there a nameservice-independent way to obtain the values for
"user_attr" and "publickey" from a shell script (if not I would propose
to add a extension to "getent") ?
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Uni
Peter Tribble wrote:
> On 1/1/07, wb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
> > inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
> > I decided to remove the crout file.
> > The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but still
> > growing.
> >
> > How could I make
Cyril Plisko wrote:
[snip]
> 26 * Copyright (c) 2005 SilverStorm Technologies, Inc. All rights reserved.
> 27 *
> 28 * This software is available to you under a choice of one of two
> 29 * licenses. You may choose to be licensed under the terms of the GNU
> 30 * General Public Licen
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote:
> > . * * . * .* .
> > . * . .*
> > President, * . . /\ ( . . *
> > Rite Online Inc.
Felix Schulte wrote:
> On 12/19/06, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's not something one is supposed to take advantage of!
> >
> > >From vfork(2) (albeit admittedly the SX version of the man page):
> > The vfork() function is deprecated. Its sole legitimate use as a prelude t
Stephen Lau wrote:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
> > It seems all the list archives are gone from mail.opensolaris.org - for
> > example http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/ksh93-integration-discuss/
> > only shows an empty directory instead of the archived messages... ;-((
> &
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
