I've gotten a config working where I have Kerberos auth to AD and
passwd lookups via LDAP to AD. I enable it, and it works fine, but on
a reboot, it stops working. Please let me know if you have any
thoughts as to why this happens. (This behavior is common to both
oi147 and Solaris 11 Express.)
Co
Took a different approach. I started with the baseline /etc/pam.conf
and began adding Kerberos lines to it rather than trying to figure out
what part of my config was wrong. Now, auth works and no more errors!
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Patrick O'Sullivan
wrote:
> Thanks for the
Thanks for the idea. I will see how I can go about that.
I just downloaded Solaris 11 Express and duplicated the error. Auth
works, but same message at every login.
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Chris Ridd wrote:
>
> On 14 Nov 2010, at 00:15, Patrick O'Sullivan wrote:
>
>>
Hello all,
I successfully have gotten authentication to an AD Kerberos server
working along with uid/gid resolution from AD LDAP. However, I am
getting a strange PAM error and the only reference I can find for it
is in the OpenSolaris PAM source code.
r...@oitest1:~# uname -a
SunOS oitest1 5.11 o
> It has been stated time and time again that it's
> _very unlikely_ that anything will be revealed before
> the fiscal year is over. That's on thursday the
> earliest.
Just FYI, the Fiscal Year End was 2010-05-31 and the results were released last
Thursday, the 24th.
Being patient for a bit lon
could it be that the problem is located at the SAS side?
it look that mpt driver is complaining. This should be on the LSI HBA side.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You may try the following
:~# zpool create arabica raidz2 c4d1 c5d1 c6d0 c7d0
zpool is happily devours whole raw disks (as reported on format), not necessary
to feed it with slices.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
mac_ver 671088640
I will happily act as "remotable test dummy" and gather all necessary
information.
If someone (maybe Murayama-san) would like to take a look at this.
It is also possible to provide a remote ssh root shell to this box.
with kindest regards,
patrick.
--
I stored the output of prtconf -pv at opensolaris.pastebin
prtconf -pv -> http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/177
prtpicl -v -> http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/179
prtdiag -lv-> http://opensolaris.pastebin.ca/182
please let me know if I can supply further information
--
This mes
I tried to install a more recent build on that M/B (b131) and the graphics
seems to workok, but I get serious problems with the onboard NIC the assigned
gani driver could not attach
dmesg...
[ID 217474 kern.info] gani0: ilr 0x010a
[ID 825931 kern.info] gani0: ddiregsmap_setup failed (ret:-1
paste me that
off-list cause I seriously can't find it and I'd be very interested in
knowing how to get that working cause I don't think it's officialy
supported by Oracle and I don't think it will be...
Cheers,
Patrick
_
Hi Dennis,
I had happening the same on my Ultra-2 last week and asked one of the coworkers.
Apparently this can happen when the SCSI disks take too long to
respond to certain syscalls done by the operating system.
I am still trying to find out the whats and whys regarding this...
--
Patrick
figures returned seem to be a bit off or at
least worrying for us if the statistics are really just from this
zone...
--
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Cj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a way to encrypt a flat file or a database file so it can be ftp or
> sftp to a remote windows system?
>
> this is for solaris/AIX etc.
>
> or is there a 3 party sw that can be used?
PGP?
blem and it constantly rebooted after an X
percentage and I found out it was a kernel panic thrown due to my
media being corrupted.
--
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> Can I see a stacktrace of this please ?
>
> Thx,
> FrankH.
And here is the ::stack output. I did my very best to reproduce the
panics with the 32 bit kernel but no go (which is good for me I guess :P)
unix.0 and vmcore.0
page_ctr_add_internal+0x11c(0, 3, ff0003bfffc8, 1)
page_ctr_add+0x
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Frank Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can I see a stacktrace of this please ?
I have plenty, here goes the output of ::msgbuf in mdb :)
unix.0 and vmcore.0:
panic[cpu0]/thread=ff01d72e1b00:
BAD TRAP: type=e (#pf Page fault) rp=ff0008b0e0f0 addr=ff000b9b
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Ghee Teo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick Ale wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I get random kernel panics when running SXCE 95 with the 64 bit
>> kernel. The panics seem to have to do with reads/writes to disk.
>> I can
tioned are also reproducable in b96.
--
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
writes lts to /var/adm/messages).
When I boot the 32 bit kernel, the panics disappear.
It's an Acer Aspire 8920 laptop with 4GB of memory.
Anyone else who has similar problems? I already filed a bug report, I
just didnt get the number back yet.
--
Pa
the last of in 1998.
I am not saying which is better, I am just saying the dependencies are
there for giving full facts in the discussion's sake :)
Both Sunfreeware and CSW have pros and cons, just use what you feel
more comfortable with, I am really too busy for a sunfreeware vs CSW
vs t
the bloatware dependencies installed, sunfreeware when I have a bit
more time to spend on what I need, and sources when I want to make
myself unmissable at work ;-)
--
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
arc.net
oldsparc.org openfor.info openfor.org opn4.biz opn4.com opn4.info
opn4.net opn4.org
end quote.
--
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Seems in the Forum at
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=66361&tstart=0
my last post, wasn't send.
So, my last post you can see in the MailingList at
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-discuss/2008-July/041945.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Compaq 6710b laptop with the BM5787 mobile gigabit network cad.
> All nevada builds give very poor performance, network wise. SCP
> sessions stall, sites take two minutes to open, et
30:19 laptop-upc rcm_daemon[1044]: [ID 988102 daemon.error]
IP: Device consumers prohibit offline(bge0)
As as I stop the network traffic, the errors disapear.
Is anyone else having this problem and is there a work around? I am
using b88 at the moment.
--
Pa
important to me to know, if its feasible to convert an existing Solaris
2.51 environment to branded zones, because the spare parts for that old
hardware are running out of order.
With best regards
Patrick
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I choose Nexanta because it's light and slim.
Fast installation, and small distribution size.
Probably you can also install Solaris Express "headless"
without X...
Then I like the apt-get package manager, which
is very familiar to debian.
For what you want to pay a couple of hundreds?
> But what a
You could probably also fetch all the sources of the
packages mentioned in that how-to, and compile them
on Sol 10. All the packages are OpenSource.
> Plain Nevada, then moving the solution back to Sol 10 (it's a production
> system).
>
> /tony
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
Hi there
Which of the OpenSolaris distros are you using?
If you're using Nexenta then this tutorial might
help:
http://howtoforge.com/perfect_setup_debian_etch
It's for debain, but Nexenta uses the same package
system.
I moved from one ISP to another, by creating two accounts
with Outlook (or ano
Could you please provide, what you did (step-by-step would even be
wonderful)?
First diabled rge driver...? Would be very helpfull...
Dennis Clarke schrieb:
>> Anyone out there successfully installed the gani driver on a snv_85 system.
>> And if so how? Read the README.txt, and followed the instr
Anyone out there successfully installed the gani driver on a snv_85 system. And
if so how? Read the README.txt, and followed the instructions, but with no
success.
Right now, I have a working rge driver. But seems to have some performance
issue with CIFS/Samba and even with iSCSI.
# prtconf -v
ethernet card:
pci bus 0x0018 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x14e4 device 0x1693
Broadcom Corporation NetLink BCM5787M Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express
Cheers,
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I meant to hit spell check rather than post message on my previous reply.
Sorry for the mistakes.
Patrick
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thank you both for your reply's. I am at work right now so I cannot test the
cures. When I get home tonight I will follow your suggestions, and post what
happens. I am currently trying to convince my employer to switch to an
alternative OS, other than the one they u$e right now. Solaris, Deb
the solution when I have one.
But if you have any suggestions about how to get rid of it PLEASE post it here.
It is being told to look for it by something, now the trick is to find out
what is telling it to look, and tell it to stop.
Thank You for your time,
Patrick
This message posted
11, and SVG seems to be supported.
I just had a look at this http://www.carto.net/williams/yosemite/
SVG app.
Greetings,
Patrick
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/2.0.0.11/releasenotes/#contributedbuilds
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
op
e boundaries or misinterpretation of
emails. One thing is for sure. These kind of emails don't help the
community and may look this mailling list like a bunch of negative
nancy's who should go out more.
>
> > Thanks for your cooperation.
"Goodbye" (yes, I did watch R
my €0.09.
We're all aware that there are no SLAs or platinum contracts involved
with these builds right? Last time I checked this was all community
driven work and all. Besides, you can have build 80 already if you
care enough.
Patrick
___
opens
ngs to do.
Sorry for my bluntness but this is both silly and frustrating looking
at the work that still has/should be done.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 11, 2007 4:59 PM, Alan Coopersmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patrick Ale wrote:
> > Hi guys,
Hi Alan!
Well I know who's working on the case, it's Brian. I have his email
address and he is helping me a lot a already, James gave me some
pointers as well
g after BFU to nv_76
> 6628353 Make libraries reside in the same directory
> 6639117 JDS only starts with xVM kernel
>
Hi James!
It's CR 6639382. JDS Soundsystem not working properly. Even though I
got the answer yesterday per this mailing list I'd li
On Dec 11, 2007 11:49 AM, Ché Kristo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Was the bug filed through http://bugs.opensolaris.org/ or Bugzilla?
>
Hi Ché ,
It was filed at bugs.opensolaris.org :)
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing l
ug back
in the database :s
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 12/10/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Patrick:
> >
> > > This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had
> > to
> > > rebuil
On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Patrick:
>
> > This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had to
> > rebuild anything.
[snip]
Hi Brian :)
As far as I can tell I am using the same OSS modules 4.00, but I am not s
On Dec 10, 2007 7:17 PM, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Patrick:
>
> Note that for GNOME/GStreamer to work best with OSS, you need to rebuild
> the SUNWgnome-audio* and SUNWgnome-media* packages after installing the
> OSS packages. To do this you should use the C
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a
fix, it's a workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
This message post
ntrol tell me the correct gstreamer plugins or
sounddevice arent installed.
Does anyone here recognize this behaviour?
Cheers,
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> >
> I didn't see it mentioned in this thread so I assume it wasn't done
> already. I filed a bug five minutes ago regarding my current experience with
> a clean SXCE76 build. Let's see what comes out ;-)
>
> Patrick
>
I just downloaded SXCE77
uild that doesn't play nice.
As always, if I can help debug, let me know, just give me a hint or two of
what commands I should try.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 7, 2007 8:15 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2007 2:44 PM, Aubrey Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Or please guide me a right mailing list to ask.
> >
>
>
I didn't see it mentioned in this thread so I assume it
. If you don't know how to implement it or use
it in an intended way then they didn't screw up.. you just have to do some
research.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Dec 2, 2007 7:03 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is Sun even sure it's self what will do what and what will replace what? I
just get an email from somebody of this list saying Indiana will replace
SXCE and will be the basis for Solaris 11. Which is ff-ing funny since
maybe I should do more about life and less
about IRC and fora. As for scripts, it has been wildely established as well
that PATHs and directories where binaries reside is a bit off from what you
can expect from a Solaris binary distribution or SXCE.
So yes, if you want everyth
On Nov 19, 2007 12:05 PM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:56 AM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 19, 2007 11:50 AM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I read it right there on the S
On Nov 19, 2007 11:56 AM, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 11:50 AM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > I read it right there on the Solaris 10 manual page, the relevant excerpts
> > which I quoted in my posts for referenc
;t ever use it cause you'll have to shutdown
the system anyway.
Is there somebody from Sun who could shred a light on this? ;-)
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hey handle our systems. A Netra v240 only has two internal bays.
We slice c1t0d0 into /, swap, /var, /opt and /metadb (last one is used
for metadb later) and we have no problems whatsoever with replacing
one of the internal disks. Where did you read this statement exactly?
A Sun authentic resource?
Pat
ind quite logical. All my drives are ATA/SATA and not
even hotplugable. I only see my USB and Firewire hosts, which are
hotplugable.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Nov 18, 2007 11:07 PM, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> sun's manuals actually say you must run cfgadm
Which makes a very good point that 'habbits' vs reading manuals should
be in favor of reading manuals. Something I adm
gineer telling me to do a cfgadm -c unconfigure
I prolly wouldn't ever have done it, which might have lead to where
you were now..
I am not trying to make it a fact you should use cfgadm, I am just
parroting what I got told from a Sun engineer. I hope it will help
people in the future anyw
#x27; or
things might go bad. (wait till the disk status led on the front turns
blue).
His theory was that the hardware is hotpluggable but the OS sometimes
doesn't play nice with hotplug.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
; to describe to you what you can expect by adopting one of these releases.
> But careful to adopt anything here, because who knows if it'll exist
> tomorrow, or next month."
>
> I'm a fan of Sun (really, I am a Java developer who knows just enough about
> Solaris t
g will hopefully answer
that question. But right now, we are in flux. Personally, I have
played around with the Developer Preview but I am still using SX*E for
my day-to-day as it's a complete OS, and the Developer Preview is just
that, a preview for developers.
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
sibilities, that
> the OGB, empowered by our constitution, has delegated to them [24]
> (which may be because they were not informed of this delegation;
> adequately or at all).
I agree with this problem, although I am not sure which part of your
proposal addresses it. Regardless of the
I'd suggest there is a difference between logos and mascots.
Logos tend to represent products and organisations, mascots represent
communities and lend personality.
In other words, I think a pig is a mascot, not a logo.
Patrick
Sara Dornsife wrote:
> We talked about a flying
;>>>
>>>> Total 40012 files, 8793366 lines
>>>>
>>> Thats funny, I remember seeing '11m' mentioned in some opensolaris
>>> slides. Marketing to blame?
>
>
> When we launched we said 10 million, but the media got it wro
On 9/30/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did you compile with any optimization switches?
Nope, I used the same environmental file I use since compiling
onnv_69, the only addition was __SSNEXT=""; export __SSNEXT to get it
compiling with Sun S
y.
This is done on an AMD 4400+ (64 Bit)
Consider yourself advised :)
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hey all,
Trying to avoid another "what to discuss here and not" thread a quick
and simple question:
Where can I report problems/experiences regarding ONNV gate compiles?
Thankies,
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolar
Hi,
Check out Erwann Chénedé's blog:
http://blogs.sun.com/erwann/
regards
Patrick
Rishabh Nagendra wrote:
> Hi there,
> I'm new to Solaris. I have installed Solaris from the DVD labeled "Solaris
> Express Developer Edition".
> I'm used to Linux, so I
ou'd go to a specific mailing list handling the matter you
want to discuss.
In short: opensolaris-discuss should be used and accepted for any
input regarding opensolaris, for specific or in depth discussions you
may want to and should be able to redirect users NICELY and POLITEL
> >
> Sorry, I forgot to check my filters, that should have been
> caiman-discuss only.
I actually filed a bug yesterday :)
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
15.69MB(2/0/0) 32130
As you can see, the installer happely installs my root partition way
beyond the 1024th cylinder..
Patrick / WickedWicky
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
am pretty sure I was able to layout filesystems with SXDE 68 and 69.
The installer for the "normal" installation is still the java/CDE
installer, is this correct? This is what I actually use for the moment
since it does allow me to lay out file systems..
I hope
m there.
Happy playing!
Patrick
Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> I'm using Ubuntu Feisty (x86_64). I didn't use particular partition tools,
> just
> Linux fdisk and Solaris fdisk. FYI the hardware is a Dell M65 laptop.
>
> It turned out Solaris seems to reset the MBR an
n but.. why ship SS12 with SXCE and SXDE when
11 is what you're recommending?
Take care and thanks for the answers,
Patrick Ale
WickedWicky
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hives directory, and I think it's cause of
the error shown in the mail_msg.
Can someone give me a guide line as of what I am doing wrong or how I
can fix it?
I am trying to compile on an Athlon 2400XP+ with Sun Studio Pro 12,
which is shipped by default with Nevada 69.
Thanks in advance!
P
On 8/5/07, W. Wayne Liauh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I specify my $yourIP when operating as a dhcp client?
>
Use the loopback IP address 127.0.0.1, simply add your hostname to the
existing line in /etc/hosts, beginning with 127.0.0.1 (and ::1 for
IPv6)
Patrick Ale
Hi,
As far as I know, Developer Edition contains NetBeans and Sun Studio
(that is, they install immediately after Solaris Express) and, as you
point out, the installation is slightly more graphical.
Express gives you the whole GNOME environment.
regards,
Patrick
Bruno wrote:
> He
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:45 +0200, Patrick Finch wrote:
>> Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 22:38 -0700, Korey Peters wrote:
>>>>> I think the "40%" was a rectum pluck rather than it
>>>>> being a
ew
>>>
>>> ___
>>> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
>>> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>> The 40% certainly was a "rectum-pluck". I was thinking about a goal for
>> Solaris on the
t;
> HTH
>
> Boyd
What about the GUI from the GNOME menu (as root) Administration ->
Network, and then General Settings (second tab), and just change the
hostname there and reboot (this is a 3 month old build).
I didn't read this anywhere, but it *seemed* to work. Any reason why
this wasn't a good idea?
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:00:09 +0200, Mario Goebbels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Today when I hit by mistake ENTER a letter before finishing to type my
password, I witnessed me being logged in anyway. So trying to trim the
end of my password, I found out that only the first eight letters count.
Hi!
I have read at
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/result.xhtml?url=/newsticker/meldung/90435
that Sun plans to publish version 12 of Sun Studio for Linux and Solaris free
of charge on 4.6.2007 at
http://developer.sun.com/sunstudio
This also then includes again its C/C++ and Fortran Compiler for L
I think we risk confusing the strength of the admin with a strength of
the platform. Latin scholars make great linguists, after all.
Patrick
Andre van Eyssen wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2007, Patrick Finch wrote:
If I understand correctly, you are saying that a Solaris user can
become a Linux
nux users.
And for those with an interest in the long-term health of the Linux
community, it certainly doesn't seem like a problem, does it?
Isn't this our problem?
Patrick
a b wrote:
Presumably because Linux is easier to use. And you either are smarter
than the average user or h
side-effect that matters in a significant way (ie.
is there _anything_ that would expect a directory to be generated and
left that way?)
Regards,
Patrick Georgi
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
olaris user can become
a Linux user with ease, but not vice versa. Do you consider this to be
a strength or a weakness of Linux?
Patrick
UNIX admin wrote:
Those places are
Solaris heavy, in my experience.
What does that tell you?
But there are a lot of places that need a system that
s
Brian Gupta schrieb:
It might not be "clicky-bunty" like Linux, but a real IT/CS
professional never needed or used "clicky-bunty" tools to begin with.
And if I read about people running Linux for enterprise workloads and
complaining about lack of "clicky-bunty" in Solaris, I have to ask:
are
resembles http://www.tux.org/ more than
http://www.linux.org/ or http://www.ubuntu.com.
There is lots of interest in OpenSolaris out there, and I think that we
increasingly need to have a newbie portal or similar.
Patrick
Brian Gupta wrote:
I have started an ongoing personal project to engage my
ment to my knowledge, but rather, it has been about
facilitating community building up to this point. Indeed, Jim just
convened a lengthy discussion on those lines.
Are you proposing that the OpenSolaris marketing community be
reconstituted for the purpose of product management? (it seems like i
kely), see "ccache internal error" and "unsupported
compiler option", and maybe "not a C/C++ file" categories in the stats
below, it's quite good already.
The cache was on an nfsv4 mount, so with a local cache, things should be
a bit faster.
Regards,
Patrick
Agreed. From the articles in question:
"As we make Solaris more familiar to Linux users, we don't (want to)
lose what makes it more compelling and competitive," Murdock said
MC wrote:
I like to believe that Sun's aim is to make Solaris a better operating system. You must keep your
head
It's my fault...I was updating it and I hadn't got round to for a while.
I will try to fix that this week.
thanks for your patience!
Patrick
Doug Scott wrote:
Hey,
Just looking on the front page of the Open Solaris site showed the latest news is dated
"03/09/2007"
Hi Jörg,
It's here
http://www.sun.com/software/opensource/whitepapers/Sun_Microsystems_OpenSource_Licensing.pdf
Can I ask where that URL came from? I guess it should be updated.
regards
Patrick
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Hi all,
it seems that Simon Phipps whitepaper
http://www.su
SUNW* packages only in my build.
Patrick Georgi
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
$ pkginfo -c system |grep -i atheros
system SUNWatheros Atheros 802.11b/g Wireless
NIC Driver
Greetings from Germany,
Patrick
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
i think it has something to do with the move to modular Xorg, but i've been
trying to run mplayer on both snv_59 (clean install from sxde DVD) and
opensolaris_b60 (bfu'd from 59). that package always worked fine on 57. i can
start gmplayer and it works until i try and play a movie-- i can go in
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
