Re: [osol-discuss] Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-02-09 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> Sherry Moore wrote: > > >I'd like to propose a project to enable and enhance Solaris support for > >shipping and future Intel processors and platforms. +1 > >As we are all aware of, Sun and Intel have formed an alliance to make > >Solaris the Unix operating system of choice on Intel platforms

Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC

2006-07-27 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> p.s.: Is SUNW interested in GRUB2 on sparc? We finally could boot from > USB mass storage then. The idea that GRUB or GRUB2 has anything to do with what devices a system can or can not boot from is mostly a miss-conception. A number of amd64/legacy-x86 systems have BIOSs that can talk to and

Re: [osol-discuss] the grubby looking install process

2006-07-10 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> He is right handed and like a lot of right handed people he simply moved his > hand to the numeric keypad and hit the "1" key. But the numlock option on > the keyboard is not on when you boot the Solaris CDROM and thus he got > "garbage". Since the backspace key has never worked right he got mo

Re: Re[2]: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris on Intel Macs??

2006-04-14 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> Hello Jan, > > Friday, April 14, 2006, 2:31:00 AM, you wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Reading from the HDD is killing GUI performance on > >> > the iMac, it seems... > >> > > > >> > > >> > There's an (supposedly dangerously) hacked ata > >> > driver floating around > >> > hat makes t

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris iMac Hello World

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
To, as promised follow up on my own message: > The next hurdle is that the Solaris fdisk doesn't interact all that > well with the bootcamp prepared disk. I hacked around this by hand > and am still gathering information to file the appropriate bug > (with workaround). I'll follow up when t

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Re: Solaris on Intel Macs??

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> > > > > > > > > Reading from the HDD is killing GUI performance on > > the iMac, it seems... > > > > > > > There's an (supposedly dangerously) hacked ata > > driver floating around > > hat makes this work OK. Please contact me off-line if > > you'd like a > > copy of it. The bug that covers

[osol-discuss] Solaris iMac Hello World

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
I've managed to install Solaris on an iMac with the bootcamp bits. The most significant hurdles were conquered when Juergen Keil enabled both multiboot and GRUB to work in a i8042 free system. That work is covered by: 6412224 GRUB hangs when no i8042 is present 6412226

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Re: Solaris on Intel Macs??

2006-04-13 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> > Quick questions since I haven't had time to setup the environment to > > play with your patches yet. Did you see any disks, or can't you type > > anything yet ? > > Hmm, the Intel ICH7 chipset in the Intel iMac seems to suffer from the > "cntrl sharing DMA engine between channels" problem,

Re: [osol-discuss] Creating new device node in device tree at system startup.

2006-03-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
7;t read it, but it was not > evident why it wouldn't. > > Thanks for all you help. > > Lou > > Jan Setje-Eilers wrote: > > > You'll want to take a look at the driver.conf(4) man page and > >translate all the bits of information you previously decorated

Re: [osol-discuss] annoying message during installation

2006-03-27 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
You're right, that's pretty ugly. The right place to invest to make this better is to get rid of the reboot entirely. Now that we're installing x86 via the ramdisk, once SPARC follows, the whole launcher (which installs from CDs 2 through 876) can be ditched. If someone wants to go though hav

Re: [osol-discuss] Creating new device node in device tree at system startup.

2006-03-27 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
You'll want to take a look at the driver.conf(4) man page and translate all the bits of information you previously decorated the node with via boot.rc into your .conf file. So, something like: name="ipmi_lpc" parent="/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0" device-type="pci" unit-address="1f" ... You'll als

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> > > > > For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot > >and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: > > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on > > > > One question: when you look a the way the installer works on Solaris

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> > > > > For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot > >and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: > > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on > > You can probably gain a little more by not using a logging ufs filesyste

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-29 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
> Jan Setje-Eilers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot > > and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: > > > > http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_n

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: grub miniroot optimisation (was Re: [dtrace-discuss] Comments on SystemTap?)

2005-09-28 Thread Jan Setje-Eilers
For what it's worth, I hacked away at the nevada build 22 miniroot and was able to install a 128Mb system. Here are the details: http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/setje?entry=post_new_boot_solaris_on -jan ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensola