Re: [osol-discuss] So who is ready to be let down?

2010-06-28 Thread Anton
This is the next whimper in a queue, when the America is discovered again and again. Those who need the Solaris,, they will use it, even oracle wants them to pay for any bit processed with each system cpu. But such a way will definitely not attract new fellows. The same as SCO Unix, McDona

[osol-discuss] Select hardware

2010-04-29 Thread Anton Pomozov
I need to make OpenSolaris xVM work on this hardware: - MB Intel DQ57TM - CPU Intel i5-660 Is it possible to start it up on that MB/CPU? Whether will be xVM work well on it? Would be better to change MB on that one: Intel DX58SO? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

Re: [osol-discuss] Java threads hang on x2200 AMD/Solaris 10

2009-06-04 Thread Anton Mironenko
After applying the latest Solaris release from May 2009 "Kernel version: SunOS 5.10 Generic_139556-08, Solaris 10 5/09 s10x_u7wos_08 X86", the bug is not reproduced any longer. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing

[osol-discuss] Java threads hang on x2200 AMD/Solaris 10

2009-06-02 Thread Anton Mironenko
Hi all, Sorry, my question is about Solaris, not OpenSolaris. I've got the following problems: 1) The result of System.nanoTime() on Solaris/AMD64 returns unexpectedly huge value and then doesn't increase: http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=61998 2) During an execution of java.uti

[osol-discuss] Re: Project proposal - Argentix

2006-03-12 Thread Anton Brondz
Yes, Nexenta for example. It's very unstable, I tried to install it and the next time I booted the computer it didn't even boot. In another case, Nexenta wouldn't even boot the install cd. There are also a lot of bugs in GNU/OpenSolaris distributions, like GNOME doesn't load, X crashes. This me