Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
Ah. Thanks, again. Sounds like on the source end, now that I'm okay with GPL software, I might stick with Linux. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 04/ 1/11 04:21 PM, Andrew Greimann wrote: > Once again, thank you. :) I remember receiving an original answer to the > "source" question last year. > > Does an equivalent to "sudo apt-get source package_name" that exists on > Linux, exist for Solaris? For those unfamiliar, this downloads a .t

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
Once again, thank you. :) I remember receiving an original answer to the "source" question last year. Does an equivalent to "sudo apt-get source package_name" that exists on Linux, exist for Solaris? For those unfamiliar, this downloads a .tar.gz format source code package of the package reques

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 04/ 1/11 01:35 PM, Andrew Greimann wrote: > I believe a while back last year I had asked if it were theoretically > possible to build a distro, and how much source must be with it, for which, > I'm happy to state, I got a clear answer. However, can one provide source > only for modified/built

[osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
I believe a while back last year I had asked if it were theoretically possible to build a distro, and how much source must be with it, for which, I'm happy to state, I got a clear answer. However, can one provide source only for modified/built binaries, link to the Source Browser for unmodified

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 release date

2011-04-01 Thread Dmitry G. Kozhinov
:))) It was 06.06.2006 when Apple transitioned to Intel processors, am I wrong? If seriously, November is too far date IMHO. Let's see what Oracle will present at April 14th: http://event.on24.com/r.htm?e=298093&s=1&k=12D718A6822685EE6AD2390FC381A7AE&partnerref=opensolaris Dmitry. -- This messa

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 11 release date

2011-04-01 Thread Matthias Pfützner
Guess, what, it might even be an option... ;-) As Oracle never comments on future dates, we will still have to wait and see... :-( Matthias You (Mike DeMarco) wrote: > Wouldn't it be great if Solaris 11 was released at 11:11 am on November 11, > 2011 > > 11 11 11 11 11 = 1023 decimal >

[osol-discuss] Solaris 11 release date

2011-04-01 Thread Mike DeMarco
Wouldn't it be great if Solaris 11 was released at 11:11 am on November 11, 2011 11 11 11 11 11 = 1023 decimal O R A C L E ,S O L A RI S ascii 79 82 65 67 76 69 44 83 79 76 65 82 73 83 = 1023 -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _