On 10/13/10 04:27 PM, samantha brekel wrote:
when will the recent builds be completed
What recent builds?
--
Ian.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
when will the recent builds be completed
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 10/13/10 01:01 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
"Alex Smith (K4RNT)"
writes:
You'll only be bound by the Windows maximum memory addressing limit.
According to the Wikipedia article on Windows 7, Home Premium 64-bit
edition is limited to 16GB, and higher editions are limited to 192GB.
YMMV, I
I'm no expert in the cloud space, but last time I looked, joyent.com was
opensolaris-based. Perhaps you could try them.
However, in my cloud-based provider search I found co-located physical hardware
that I purchased/leased (and therefore could install my own [open]solaris) was
way less expensi
It occurred to me that you might get better graphics performance by
_not_ running your Windows apps in a virtual machine. If that's
critical then you may want to virtualize Solaris instead. Or dual
boot. Just a thought...
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
Gary Driggs writes:
> Are you running windows locally or across NFS? If the latter, be
> sure to use GigE interfaces and switch. Also, if you want a home NAS
> box consider NexentaStor's community edition that's free for up to
> 12 Tb of storage.
Locally only
___
"Alex Smith (K4RNT)"
writes:
> You'll only be bound by the Windows maximum memory addressing limit.
>
> According to the Wikipedia article on Windows 7, Home Premium 64-bit
> edition is limited to 16GB, and higher editions are limited to 192GB.
>
> YMMV, I run a 64-bit Windows 7 Professional host
On 10/13/10 11:15 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
"Dmitry G. Kozhinov"
writes:
What I'm asking here is if running a virtual windows 7 would be able
to take good advantage of the 24 GB or ram?
I think that VirtualBox will be fairly able to allocate most of the
24GB of RAM to guest Windows
You'll only be bound by the Windows maximum memory addressing limit.
According to the Wikipedia article on Windows 7, Home Premium 64-bit
edition is limited to 16GB, and higher editions are limited to 192GB.
YMMV, I run a 64-bit Windows 7 Professional host with 4GB RAM.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 1
Are you running windows locally or across NFS? If the latter, be sure to use
GigE interfaces and switch. Also, if you want a home NAS box consider
NexentaStor's community edition that's free for up to 12 Tb of storage.
-Gary
___
opensolaris-discuss mai
"Dmitry G. Kozhinov"
writes:
>> What I'm asking here is if running a virtual windows 7 would be able
> to take good advantage of the 24 GB or ram?
>
> I think that VirtualBox will be fairly able to allocate most of the
> 24GB of RAM to guest Windows 7 64bit. I did try myself though.
Thanks for
Use the DVD player from fluendo.com
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Hi Karel,
>
> I am well aware of the fact that neither of the
> relevant drivers (i.e. yge, yukonx, myk) currently
> supports the Marvell 8059 as I have explicitly
> pointed it out in the first sentence of this thread,
> as well as in the previous thread I have been
> referring to. I personally
> What I'm asking here is if running a virtual windows 7 would be able
to take good advantage of the 24 GB or ram?
I think that VirtualBox will be fairly able to allocate most of the 24GB of RAM
to guest Windows 7 64bit. I did try myself though.
- Dmitry.
--
This message posted from opensolari
I'm at the point where I need to upgrade my hardware for my home zfs
server. Its not that I've outstripped the hardware with work, but
more that hardware is getting pretty old and showing signs of
problems.
Hardware is Athlon64 +3400 2.2Ghz. It only has capability of holding
3GB or ram.
I'm th
Hi Karel,
I am well aware of the fact that neither of the relevant drivers (i.e. yge,
yukonx, myk) currently supports the Marvell 8059 as I have explicitly pointed
it out in the first sentence of this thread, as well as in the previous thread
I have been referring to. I personally tried them al
The system specs are:
x86, snv111b 32-bit
USB keyboard and mouse.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
hello budy
the only needed setting to run napp-it should be set in file /etc/sudoers
and this is normally done via online-installer:
webservd ALL=(root) NOPASSWD: ALL
if this entry is missing, you will get your error message due to insufficient
permissions.
and
i would strongly recommend setup
Hmm… my oi147 is also a new installation.
I did not run the installer since I do already have Netatalk installed and
setup and I wasn't sure, whether or not the napp-it installer would recognize
it.
I have then downloaded napp-it 0.325_pre manually and installed it, but when I
try ti run any s
The break sequence on more recent builds of OpenSolaris was changed to
"Shift-Pause" but I forget which build this came in.
Also note that if the console is in graphics mode, the kmdb prompt may
have come up behind the graphics screen (we make no attempt to switch
back to text mode). You can
hello all
i could not reproduce this problem on a new install.
did you have this problem with napp-it 0.325_pre, installed
with online-installer
wget -O - www.napp-it.org/nappit-newest | perl
up from this version, napp-it use sudo instead of pfexec,
so the role should not matter (or am i wrong?)
Thanks Casper.
I reverted exec_attr and rolemod also just did it.
Thanks,
budy
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
senti...@openindiana:/etc/security$ pfexec usermod -P 'Primary
Administrator' webservd
Works for me.
senti...@openindiana:/etc/security$ uname -a
SunOS openindiana 5.11 oi_147 i86pc i386 i86pc Solaris
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 02:38, wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>yesterday I tried to set up the webservd a
>Hi,
>
>yesterday I tried to set up the webservd as requested and I removed the
>All:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0 from /etc/security/exec_attr, but after doing that I
>couldn't access any low level system function in napp-it, like viewing the
>discs or the zpools.
All should be exacty like:
All:suser:cm
Hi,
yesterday I tried to set up the webservd as requested and I removed the
All:suser:cmd:::*:uid=0 from /etc/security/exec_attr, but after doing that I
couldn't access any low level system function in napp-it, like viewing the
discs or the zpools.
usermod -P 'Primary Administrator' webservd d
25 matches
Mail list logo
