So write some shell scripts, compile some software, test some software. That
should be more than enough to meet the requirements;)
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Octave J. Orgeron
Solaris Virtualization Architect and Consultant
Web: http://unixconso
> Solaris 10 can be used for strictly self-educational purposes..
Not even for self-education. The (developer) license text at
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/licenses/solaris-cluster-express-license-167852.html
says:
"only for the purpose of developing, testing, prototyping and demonstratin
On 9/10/2010 4:25 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Solaris 10 can be used for strictly self-educational purposes..
From this Oralcle site reads out:
Developers:
All software downloads are free, and most come with a Developer License that
allows you to use full versions of the products at no charge
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Edward Martinez
> wrote:
> > It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express
> wil be under and it's solaris 10 new license, an
> OTN lincese.
> >
> >
> http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6891-Licensing-Change-for
> -Solaris-10-and-Solaris-Cluster.html
>
> This l
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 6:11 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
> It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express wil be under and it's
> solaris 10 new license, an OTN lincese.
>
> http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6891-Licensing-Change-for-Solaris-10-and-Solaris-Cluster.html
This looks good to start w
It appears this is the license Solaris 11 Express wil be under and it's
solaris 10 new license, an OTN lincese.
http://c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6891-Licensing-Change-for-Solaris-10-and-Solaris-Cluster.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
masafumi and Ken,
thank you for your fast, very helpful replies.
Though I have double checked the OpenSolaris HCL, I still could not find any
relevant references, neither to the 890FX chipset nor to the 1090T CPU.
Ken, the most relevant/recent AMD hardware reference I found in your HCL
sumbiss
>
> My now existing problem is NFS share copying is VERY
> slow for linux users and I am constantly getting the
> following error to the console:
>
> [b]nscd: GSSAPI Error: No Credentials were
> supplied, or the credentials were unavailable or
> inacessible (no credentials cache file found)[/b]
Bill Isaacs wrote:
> I've been researching hardware for my machine, which I've just taken delivery
> on, and am curious if there would be any hardware compatibility issues with
> the xvr-2500. The machine currently has the xvr-600, and I want the fastest
> possible accelerator I can put in it.
I've been researching hardware for my machine, which I've just taken delivery
on, and am curious if there would be any hardware compatibility issues with the
xvr-2500. The machine currently has the xvr-600, and I want the fastest
possible accelerator I can put in it.
Suggestions from the Zen M
Hello,
I do not know much about linux environments (but have had to learn a few things
quickly!) - I have inherited a series of opensolaris build systems from a
previous IT administrator who has left. All of the system have been running
smooth for months until 1of them had a hiccup about 2 wee
>
> I certainly hope the terms of the settlement are
> released.
> Keeping it secret would conspire to cast FUD on all
> other
> distributions incorporating ZFS or considering it;
> most of
> which would be targeted at folks well below the
> Fortune 500,
> which means those not wealthy enough to q
I believe that was the crux of the situation, Sun did find prior art from a
whitepaper or presentation that pre-dates WAFL. I think if they had not
settled,
NetApp would have been in a ton more trouble than Sun Oracle.
*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
Hi,
Given that computer software is just a series of mathematical operations
expressed in a form that can be interpreted by a processor, I find the whole
concept of software patents less than original.
Would it not be in the best interests of those individuals and organisations
using ZFS to fi
On Sep 10, 2010, at 4:44 AM, Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Copyright a state?
>>
>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be
>> in conflict with Sun because of a codename on a
>> project?
>>
>> I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and
>> get money.
>
> I think that Inte
Hi Mike,
I think you are seeing this bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6538600
pool version is not updated in the label config after zpool upgrade and
before reboot
I saw strange zdb behavior after a pool upgrade on b146 and an
export/import of the pool cleared
On 10 Sep 2010, at 16:20, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Calum Benson wrote:
>> On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
>>
>>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
>>> because of a codename on a project?
>>
>> If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project code
Calum Benson wrote:
> On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
>
>> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
>> because of a codename on a project?
>
> If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project codename, then sure, it would be a
> strong possibility. (But
On 10 Sep 2010, at 12:20, usafverteran wrote:
> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
> because of a codename on a project?
If Sun had copyrighted the Indiana project codename, then sure, it would be a
strong possibility. (But AFAIK they didn't.)
Cheeri,
Ca
Gary Driggs wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2010, Mike Riley wrote:
>
> > I set it up as a 64-bit Open Solaris environment.
>
> Do you get the same error when trying to boot on a 32-bit VM?
Let me ask in a different way:
What boot entry from the grub menu did you try to boot?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.
On Sep 9, 2010, Mike Riley wrote:
> I set it up as a 64-bit Open Solaris environment.
Do you get the same error when trying to boot on a 32-bit VM?
-Gary
>
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I would just ran an upgrade on a pool at version 18 to version 22.
zpool upgrade euclid
This system is currently running ZFS pool version 22.
Successfully upgraded 'euclid' from version 18 to version 22
And then look ad zdb.
zdb
euclid:
version: 18
name: 'euclid'
state: 0
txg:
> Copyright a state?
>
> So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be
> in conflict with Sun because of a codename on a
> project?
>
> I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and
> get money.
I think that Intel and Zilog both trademarked letters
of the alphabet (i and z, respect
Copyright a state?
So anyone starting "Indiana Software, LLC" would be in conflict with Sun
because of a codename on a project?
I guess people have sued for dumber things to try and get money.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolari
--- On Fri, 9/10/10, Nikola M wrote:
> From: Nikola M
> Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] OpenIndiana - a new OpenSolaris Distribution!
> To: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Date: Friday, September 10, 2010, 1:21 AM
> Alasdair Lumsden wrote:
> > On Tuesday 14th September, we will be unveiling
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
