> > Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> >
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
>
> > olaris/overview/index.html
>
> Not much of a mention - just says "please go to
> OpenSolaris.com" on every tab. Interesting to see
> that there is a community tab, which also points to
> openso
> > Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> >
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
>
> > olaris/overview/index.html
>
> Not much of a mention - just says "please go to
> OpenSolaris.com" on every tab. Interesting to see
> that there is a community tab, which also points to
> openso
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>
> > Edward, STOP! be nice!
>
> I'm not being un-nice or anything. I'm completely serious. If Ken really
> believes what he says, "run away from oracle products," then why
> participate
> in this discussion forum?
>
Sorry, Edward, but t
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Mike DeMarco
>
> > > Which confirms what we've been seeing ever since the take over - run,
> > > don't walk, away from Oracle product stack.
>
> > So why are you still here?
>
[url=http://dvdsalestore.com/goods-1411-Medium+Seasons+1-6+DVD+Boxset.html]Medium
Seasons 1-6 DVD Boxset[/url]
[url=http://dvdsalestore.com/goods-1410-House+MD+Seasons+1-6+DVD+Boxset.html]House
M.D. Seasons 1-6 DVD Boxset[/url]
[url=http://dvdsalestore.com/goods-1394-Breaking+Bad+Seasons+1-3+DVD+
[url=http://wlsale.com/goods-1429-Chuck+Seasons+1-3+DVD+Boxset.html]Chuck
Seasons 1-3 DVD Boxset[/url]
[url=http://wlsale.com/goods-1417-Doctor+Who+Seasons+1-5+DVD+Boxset.html]Doctor
Who Seasons 1-5 DVD Boxset[/url]
[url=http://wlsale.com/goods-1413-Robin+Hood+Seasons+1-3+DVD+Boxset.html]Robin
H
tom60 wrote:
> Why they stop providing repository to the public? As long as Oracle
> continues to ship small CD image for users to install, then they should
> give us a way to add missing components.
Oracle hasn't released CD images for builds after 134 either, so that
argument doesn't make sense.
Shawn,
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
opensolaris.org (preferred) origin online
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
# cat /etc/release
Oracle Solaris Next Development snv_143 X86
Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its aff
On 07/29/10 04:59 PM, tom60 wrote:
Shawn,
# pkg publisher
PUBLISHER TYPE STATUS URI
opensolaris.org (preferred) origin online http://pkg.opensolaris.org/dev/
# cat /etc/release
Oracle Solaris Next Development snv_143 X86
Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Asse
> Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
> olaris/overview/index.html
Not much of a mention - just says "please go to OpenSolaris.com" on every tab.
Interesting to see that there is a community tab, which also points to
opensolaris.COM
--
This
On 07/29/10 02:33 PM, Tom Chen wrote:
Hello,
I have installed snv137 and snv143. I want to add gcc package through the
package manager. Though I can search the list of gcc related packages from the
publisher - opensolaris.org, the installation of gcc-43, gcc-432 always fails.
The error is "Pr
> The ON source was available for us to download at -
> OpenSolaris Download Center
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
>
> But it is missing for some time. Anybody knows why?
Found on the above page:
Source tarballs have been deprecated in favour of the onnv
project's Mercurial re
Hello,
The ON source was available for us to download at - OpenSolaris Download Center
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/
But it is missing for some time. Anybody knows why?
Tom
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-
Hello,
I have installed snv137 and snv143. I want to add gcc package through the
package manager. Though I can search the list of gcc related packages from the
publisher - opensolaris.org, the installation of gcc-43, gcc-432 always fails.
The error is "Preparation Failed, No version of develope
> On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:25 +0100, Alan Burlison
> wrote:
> > FYI:
> >
> > http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
> >
>
> FYI...
>
> http://blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-do
> es_sparc_have_future
> http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-
> the-future-of-
> So why are you still here?
>
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
Edward, STOP! be nice!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mail
You will need to run at lease b130 for usb support.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 14:25 +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> FYI:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
>
FYI...
http://blogs.forrester.com/richard_fichera/10-07-28-does_sparc_have_future
http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6793-Forrester-about-the-future-of-SPARC.html
Paul
> Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
> http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opens
> olaris/overview/index.html
Well...looks like Oracle has launched their "Oracle Launches Oracle + Sun
Product Strategy Event Series" show to clarify stuff. they might mention
Oracle's strategy for Opens
Oracle mentions OpenSolaris now:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/server-storage/opensolaris/overview/index.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> FYI:
>
> http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
>
> --
> Alan Burlison
Good to see some clarity on one of the areas that earlier seemed murky.
More of the same, regarding OpenSolaris (the distro) would be helpful.
The alleged removal of the servers for the postgres folks' build far
Hello Community,
I have open solaris 2009.06 running on Virtual Box. I plug in a USB device to
the computer, and click the vbox pop down menu : Devices->USB
Devices->device-name, so the system recognises the device and captures it. But
when I go into the open solaris file manager, there is no
FYI:
http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/press/161333
--
Alan Burlison
--
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Just a quick update on this... as of this morning :)
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/dell-and-hp-to-certify-and-resell-all-three-oracle-operating-systems-oracle-solaris-oracle-enterprise-linux-and-oracle-vm-on-their-x86-server-computers-2010-07-29?reflink=MW_news_stmp
--
This message posted from
> Update to my own post. Further tests more
> consistently resulted in closer to 150MB/s.
>
> When I took one disk offline, it was just shy of
> 100MB/s on the single disk. There is both an obvious
> improvement with the mirror, and a trade-off (perhaps
> the latter is controller related?).
>
>
I'm intrigued.
Can you give some examples of how it was before corruption, and how
ended up?
Sounds like a bug should be logged. If you can pin this down to a simple
"do X then Y" type of test case, even better. From my point of view, I'd
say preferably using command-line tools as they are
On 7/28/2010 4:22 PM, Karol wrote:
I appear to be getting between 2-9MB/s reads from individual disks in my zpool
as shown in iostat -v
I expect upwards of 100MBps per disk, or at least aggregate performance on par
with the number of disks that I have.
My configuration is as follows:
Two Quad
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 04:15:06PM +0100, Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network
Sustaining - Oracle UK wrote:
>
> I'm not aware that NWAM and static network config can live happily
> together. If you're using a static IP address, why do you still
> need/want NWAM enabled?
.. one of the (typica
Maybe that's it. The Time Slider. When you enable or disable it, it edits the
root crontab. When you turn it on it creates a snapshot, which is why the
deletion time would always correspond with a snapshot. I turned it on right
after install, so that's why I may not have noticed anything in
Yes, it's pipe 600 root root. One computer gets shut down nightly, another is
left running 24 hours/day. Nothing in the cron log indicates any changes. The
file seems as though it is being altered by something else. Since cron isn't
being notified or sent a HUP, I guess it's not until the ne
One thing I just remembered. Last time I sat down to track this problem, I did
discover that the changes always corresponded with a Time Slider related
snapshot. How a snapshot could influence only the root crontab I don't know.
It's odd, because each system this has happened to has the stock
31 matches
Mail list logo
