On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 9:59 PM, me wrote:
> The OGB should really think about this
>
>
We did, almost 3 years ago
Since Oracle owns the trademarks (OpenSolaris *and* Solaris...), they can do
whatever they wish with them. See
http://hub.opensolaris.org/bin/view/Main/trademark
-John
_
Have you Network Auto-Magic, aka NWAM, disabled?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
The obvious solution to this problem is to remove the "Open" from the name
Solaris and we would not have an issue at all. This is the reason there are
issues, keep the source code with the "OpenSolaris" name and the binary distro
should be renamed Solaris Next pre-beta or something of the sort.
To Herzen this "If you use OpenSolaris, you should know how to build
applications from source." is a presumptuous assumption.
Just because people use and Operating System/Environment does not mean they
have vast technical expertise. Some people are just hobbyists that like to try
out or use dif
> The last time I tried, MPlayer, the best video player IMO,
> which comes with all the video codecs you might need
Did you manage to play OGG video with mplayer on OpenSolaris smoothly? For some
reason, it doesn't play it good.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Really ? if so, I think there would be a big bug,anyone else can help
confirm this ?
Thanks.
Simon
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 11:10 AM, John Plocher wrote:
> Hot damn - a thread that is actually related to OpenSolaris code !!! :-)
>
> Given the difficulties in enumerating all the potential suffixes
Hot damn - a thread that is actually related to OpenSolaris code !!! :-)
Given the difficulties in enumerating all the potential suffixes for what
could go after the "hostname." part of the filename, I'd bet that the code
simply looks for a wildcard like "hostname.*".
If so, renaming the file to
Hello,
Our customer said after he moved the file "/etc/hostname.ce0" to
"/etc/hostname.ce0_bak_20100628" on Solaris 10,the ip address which
originally tied to the ce0 still take effect upon OS reset(that is,it
can be seen in "ifconfig -a" output and still be configured on ce0
interface),why ? The
On 06/30/10 12:40 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
On 29/06/2010, at 9:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1)
+1
So we no longer do. The obvious solution to the new order. I know for certain
that this has cost Oracle projects in the millions. Larry could care less,
however, as long as Oracle can continue pulling in projects worth tens/hundreds
of millions. Oracle's the new law in town. Cowboy up a
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/21/oracle_opensolaris_solaris_plans/
I'm not saying this is complete or accurate.
All I'm saying is that people with $$ are probably noticing and not
appreciating the silence.
Again, probably none of the Oracle employees reading these lists/forums
have the au
On 29/06/2010, at 9:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
On 06/29/10 09:22 PM, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
You (Giovanni) wrote:
I really do hope it it like you say.
Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Chad Welsh
>
> I recommend you police your employee's and their demeaning behavior!!!
If you're talking about me (I am the recent offender for language on the
list, and I apolo
Den 29-06-2010 16:09, Mike DeMarco skrev:
3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
via command line
That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
yet... ;-)
We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats why
Does this vote of support includes:
" Have a "Stand Down Day" and use it to re-educate your employees on Code
of Conduct, Ethics, Values, Company Policy,."
Just curious
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss m
On 29.06.2010 22:20, Erik Trimble wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:35 -0700, me wrote:
>> Maybe i could suggest that you do something like I used to do when I was in
>> the Army.
>> Have a "Stand Down Day" and use it to re-educate your employees on Code of
>> Conduct, Ethics, Values, Company Pol
On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 12:35 -0700, me wrote:
> Maybe i could suggest that you do something like I used to do when I was in
> the Army.
> Have a "Stand Down Day" and use it to re-educate your employees on Code of
> Conduct, Ethics, Values, Company Policy, Etc.
>
> Maybe this will cool some head
>We do occasionally remove things when they very clearly violate the TOU
Thank you. This answers my question.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Maybe i could suggest that you do something like I used to do when I was in the
Army.
Have a "Stand Down Day" and use it to re-educate your employees on Code of
Conduct, Ethics, Values, Company Policy, Etc.
Maybe this will cool some heads in this forum and help to alleviate some
temperaments.
No, I was trying to point out that your paranoid hysteria is merely people
getting pretty fed up with the list, emailing us asking us to do something
about it and our agreement that, yes, it has become a fairly tedious, abusive
and stunningly unproductive venue for all sorts of bad behaviour.
Sorry, I have found *one* of the "disappeared" posts. It was strangely placed
in the post tree. Not sure about the other one.
And it is still unclear whether there is moderation here.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
>Unless you have very specific examples of said post removals, you should not
>make such asssertions
Here you say that there is *NO* moderation.
I have two examples, though can cite them only using my memory, as they are
disappeared. Maybe not worth citing them actually.
>As for moderation, it
fisher dot jim at mac dot com said:
> I doubt that Oracle is going to maintain any commitment to opensolaris, and
> am anticipating this whole site will disappear in the near future. With
> Solaris limited to Oracle's own hardware now, I expect the "community" behind
> it to do so as well. The OS w
Unless you have very specific examples of said post removals, you should not
make such asssertions as, though I can't speak for the entire team, I am very
sure posts have not have been removed from the mailing list archives as that is
my domain and I am unaware of any such removals from this par
Jim,
I recommend you police your employee's and their demeaning behavior!!! when you
treat people in that fashion they always tend to backlash. I think you should
know best since I am always reading your post about making a better community.
When you have company representatives (whether they r
>Team is prepared to take action up to and
including moderation
careful its not emotional thinking and its the last resort.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I do hope the development branch of solaris called opensolaris can become a
more autominous community in the future.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Matthias Pfützner and company,
It has nothing to do with what you know or not, you sir are a pompus ass and
treat people with total disrespect!!!
Just because you work at Oracle and drink the Koolaid you can tell someone to
go piss up a rope and use the forums as a personal insult playgrou
I have noticed that moderation is already in place. Some (maybe off-topic,
maybe not) posts are deleted almost immediately.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Recently there has been mail on this list that violates the website
Terms of Use. Individuals are being warned. However, if this trend
continues the Website Team is prepared to take action up to and
including moderation and/or deactivation of the list. Please do not
respond to hostile posts bec
Thanks for correcting me! That's what I had in mind.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>
> On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:16, Chad Welsh wrote:
>
> > testing the waters to see if I can get away with
> treating Oracle employee's the same way they treat us
> community members and hope that I don't get banned
> from this one way free for all.
>
> If you're aware of Oracle employees personally
Jörg,
You (Joerg Schilling) wrote:
> Matthias Pfützner wrote:
>
> > Why should a PAID ORACLE employee develop drivers for hardware that will
> > never
> > show up in an Oracle product? They do it on their spare time, just like you
> > and me!
>
> Why should a member of the community write soft
Chad Welsh wrote:
> testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's
> the same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned
> from this one way free for all.
It doesn't matter if the person you're attacking is an Oracle employee or
not - that s
Matthias Pfützner wrote:
> Why should a PAID ORACLE employee develop drivers for hardware that will never
> show up in an Oracle product? They do it on their spare time, just like you
> and me!
Why should a member of the community write software that will never show up
in Solaris because there i
> Did you see today's announcement of the new systems?
>
>
> alan
Impressive enough, but probably not of interest to those worrying about
when 2010.xx will be released.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> >
> > Again, you're asking the wrong audience here...
> Even
> > if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> > Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed
> to
> > tell anything...
>
> Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the
> questions, This is what is leading to the downfall of
> this development.
Mike,
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
> >
> > Again, you're asking the wrong audience here... Even
> > if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> > Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed to
> > tell anything...
>
> Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the questions, This is what is
> leading to the do
>revolt against ORACLE and get OpenSolaris out of their hands
I afraid that they *own* this project/product.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Why are you worried about video codecs? If you use
> OpenSolaris, you should know how to build
> applications from source. The last time I tried,
> MPlayer, the best video player IMO, which comes with
> all the video codecs you might need, built under
> OpenSolaris.
>
> (There used to be an IPS
Why are you worried about video codecs? If you use OpenSolaris, you should know
how to build applications from source. The last time I tried, MPlayer, the best
video player IMO, which comes with all the video codecs you might need, built
under OpenSolaris.
(There used to be an IPS repository wh
>
> Again, you're asking the wrong audience here... Even
> if I (or any Sun/Oracle
> Employee) would know more, I wouldn't be allowed to
> tell anything...
Understood. Seems no-one is able to answer the questions, This is what is
leading to the downfall of this development. Without feedback `eve
Sorry, meant to reply to mdemarco...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
It's summer. Programmers gone mountain-climbing ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 29 Jun 2010, at 15:16, Chad Welsh wrote:
> testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's
> the same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned
> from this one way free for all.
If you're aware of Oracle employees personally abusing com
Chad,
again:
I would love to tell you more, if I would know, and if I would be allowed to.
So, again: You're using the WRONG forum to ask these questions. All those,
working for Oracle/Sun here on this alias simply can not tell you anything,
either because they don't know, or because they are no
Chad,
that's getting personal now... At least in Germany, the country where I live,
I would be allowed to sue you for such words...
So, please, stop that!
Matthias
Du (Chad Welsh) schreibst:
> Matthias oh god of the forum shut the 4uck up you are an annoying
> koolaid drinking assh
Mike,
You (Mike DeMarco) wrote:
> > > 3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
> > in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
> > via command line
> >
> > That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
> > yet... ;-)
> We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats wh
testing the waters to see if I can get away with treating Oracle employee's the
same way they treat us community members and hope that I don't get banned from
this one way free for all.
I hope there is someone that can realign the employee's attitudes when it comes
to treating people right on t
> > 3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least
> in the GUI): NIC configuration is a pain; better go
> via command line
>
> That's one of the reasons, why OSOL 2010.X isn't out
> yet... ;-)
We have heard that bugs are getting fixed and thats why 2010.X is not out yet.
What is getting fixe
Matthias oh god of the forum shut the 4uck up you are an annoying
koolaid drinking asshole!!!
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
2) Support for "new" hardware is still in development branches (new SAS 2
controllers from LSI in svn_134)
3)svn_134 has still lots of bugs/issues (at least in the GUI): NIC
configu
> Ahem:
>http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/README.txt
> http://genunix.org/dist/richlowe/
>
> Cheers,
> -Shawn
Thanks ;}
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Alan, I know that many Linux distros has video codecs included. As
> Unbreakable Linux is another distro, maybe it also has video codecs included?
> (Unless it is a strictly server distro). If video codecs are included in
> Unbreakable Linux, then Oracle has licenses. Maybe
The question of Support for Solaris/OpenSolaris has been discussed close ad
infinitum here already. Please check the archives!
And, the decision to use OpenSolaris on a production server is CU's (or
yours), not Sun's, nor Oracle's...
Matthias
You (Fredrich Maney) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28,
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
>>
>> How is that any different from how Sun positioned it? I always got the
>> impression
>> that OS was the development platform for Solaris Next. How has that changed?
>>
>> fpsm
>
> I had the impression with a stable release and a servi
Hi,
Sadanand Limaye schreef op 29-06-10 12:36:
> Generated servlet error:
> /var/apache/tomcat/work/Standalone/localhost/opengrok/index$jsp.java:77: '('
> expected.
> List project = new ArrayList();
> ^
> An error occurred betwee
I am trying to comfigure opengrok. As per Opengrok documentation.
done setup on Solaris X86 10 machine.
when tried to acess http://localhost:8080/opengrok
getting runtime error as
type Exception report
message Internal Server Error
description The server encountered an internal error (Internal
You (Giovanni) wrote:
> I really do hope it it like you say.
>
> Nevertheless, I have t say it is very difficult to work this way.
> I am talking OpenSolaris (but many things apply to Solaris as well).
>
> 1) No roadmap (do you have seen one recently)
Has been mentioned many times here: Oracle h
Hi Jack,
On 06/29/10 06:32, Jack Kielsmeier wrote:
I’m really missing pre-Oracle Sun.
Recently, my company decided to purchase many Sun Fire X4200 servers. We needed
DC power supplies and nothing too powerful CPU wise. Less than 24 hours upon
submitting an order, we decided we wanted to lower
Hi Giovanni,
On 06/29/10 06:57, Giovanni wrote
4) some key components (i.e. ramdisk implementation) have severe performance
issues (a ram disk running at 500MB/s on DDR3 1333 is slower than working on a
striped physical disk set; same ramdisk on Linux on same hw runs at several
GB/s)
B
>
> when Oracle says
> "Oracle Solaris", that includes the OpenSolaris
> distro. For instance,
> if you buy Oracle Solaris support, it *includes*
> support for running
> the OpenSolaris distro on that machine.
that clarifies everything for me. for now on when Oracle mentions "oracle
solaris",
Hi,
On 06/29/10 09:45, Orvar Korvar wrote:
I know that Fluendo offers a free MP3 sound codec. But does Fluendo offer free
video codecs?
Alan, I know that many Linux distros has video codecs included.
Wrong assumption. The most of Linux distros are not delivering
"non-free" multimedia codecs
I know that Fluendo offers a free MP3 sound codec. But does Fluendo offer free
video codecs?
Alan, I know that many Linux distros has video codecs included. As Unbreakable
Linux is another distro, maybe it also has video codecs included? (Unless it is
a strictly server distro). If video codecs
65 matches
Mail list logo
