So there is no direct way of updating this from 2009.06, you have to have b134
installed first?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi all, and thanks in advance for any help!! Appologies if this is the wrong
forum.
I installed a fresh copy of OpenSolaris, from the blastwave b134 LiveCD(because
update to b134 from 2009.06 doesn't work). I installed the compilers, and
onbld per instructions, and set up the sources, cloned
Those updates are not free. Anywhere else i can find those drivers?
Thanks,
Prudhvi Surapaneni.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> The laptop still does not power down, because every
> 30 seconds there is a batch of writes to the hdd drive,
> apparently from zfs, and that keeps the hdd powered up.
It was caused by b134 gnome-terminal. I had an iostat
running in a gnome-terminal window, and the periodic
iostat output is writ
Just saw articles ..
http://zee-nix.blogspot.com/2010/06/bridging-upnp-networks.html
http://sghai.blogspot.com/2010/06/google-summer-of-code-update-bridging.html
Posting here if these rise interest.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensol
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
> This will (maybe) reproduce the expected behaviour when ZFS and ZPOOL
> upgrades with new official bits.
It's also the point of using a boot environment, however upgrading the
zpool or zfs version will render the pool unreadable to the old
Sheer speculation. Just thought that something potentially so explosive
(before Google's Android came out) yet Sun was not paying any attention, the
reason must be that the JVM used in the installer was a seriously handicapped
version.
Many of my then-clients would have been very interested (w
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Brandon High wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, ken mays wrote:
> > You don't need snv_b134 anymore and you can update other areas as you see
> fit.
>
> I'd recommend not upgrading your zfs and zpool versions and keeping
> your b134 boot environment aroun
On Jun 19, 2010, at 8:05 PM, Erik Trimble wrote:
> I would also heartily recommend *against* Ubuntu as a replacement Linux
> server OS. RHEL, SLES, or possibly Debian, but Ubuntu is doing all the wrong
> things to take them seriously as a Server OS.
That's because it's meant to be a desktop dis
Here's a blog entry that may help clarify things:
http://blogs.sun.com/tatkar/entry/sun_studio_ide_vs_netbeans
This was based on Sun Sudio 12 Update 1 & NetBeans IDE 6.8.
/kso
Kuldip Oberoi | Sr. Manager | +650.786.0149
Oracle Corporation - Sun Developer Tools
16 Network Circle, UMPK 16-303
There's been a discussion in pkg-discuss and there are CRs and webrev
requests:
https://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15623
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~quenelle/webrev.15623/
So, yes, teams are working on it.
/kso
Kuldip Oberoi | Sr. Manager | +650.786.0149
Oracle Corporation - Sun
I've always wondered ... if one installs the full c/c++ plugins for netbeans,
do you get EXACTLY the same features as sun studio / sun studio express ... or
is there some reason to have a separate installation of sun studio in addition
to netbeans?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
On 21/06/2010 07:15, Hernan Saltiel wrote:
Thanks to Rich Lowe, I know what I did in the wrong way.
Here is what needs to be done in order to have a working onnv_142
OpenSolaris:
a) Install OpenSolaris snv_134 (this is my case only).
b) Create a directory where to put the untar'ed, unbzip2'e
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 6:57 AM, ken mays wrote:
> You don't need snv_b134 anymore and you can update other areas as you see fit.
I'd recommend not upgrading your zfs and zpool versions and keeping
your b134 boot environment around to make sure you can update to the
next official OpenSolaris rele
Denny wrote:
> I want to move from a Linux (Debian Lenny) based RootServer (Hetzner) to
> OSOL. At the moment my Box runs under Xen and Debian Lenny with four virtual
> hosts. Now I don't know what is better. Web, Mail and Jabber are own virtual
> hosts. All runs with standard applications, li
You'll have the integrated NWAN solution, ZFS bug fixes, and improvements in
802.11n support.
You can also:
1. Update the NWAN GUI and Java JDK.
2. Update grub.conf as needed.
3. Test installation of NetBeans 6.9 and Glassfish 3.0.1.
You don't need snv_b134 anymore and you can update other ar
Hi Tim,
Sun Studio Express 6/10 is not officially supported on OpenSolaris distros <=
ON snv_b138 due to the installer and few library updates needed. You can use
the 'tarball' to do the basic installation.
The other thing is installing NetBeans 6.9 properly - it comes with NetBeans
6.8 suppor
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Dmitry G. Kozhinov
>
> >Knock it off you guys.
>
> >If you want to have legitimate discussion of the merits of different
> >platforms, by all means. But this is stupid. Please
>Knock it off you guys.
>If you want to have legitimate discussion of the merits of different
>platforms, by all means. But this is stupid. Please do jump ship, so you
>won't care about this mailing list anymore.
Oh, what a hostility! Say "Linux", and you're not an IT guy, but totally enemy!
BTW
It depends on the type of virtualization one needs. If you only need the same
kernel, then lightweight Solaris Zones, AIX WPARs, or FreeBSD Jails will suit
the task at hand.
However, if one needs to run different versions of the kernel or different
versions of the OS (Solaris 8/9/10 or AIX 5.2
Hi,
thank you for the walkthrough. I've a couple of questions.
Can you give me a diskspace requirement summary? How much do the various stages
cost in terms of disk space? And can certain parts be placed on another pool?
My boot devices are very small, 18GB, so diskspace is a scarce resource.
E
"Oracle Solaris Studio Express 6/10 is supported on Solaris 10 (SPARC, x86),
OEL 5 (x86), RHEL 5 (x86), SuSE 11 (x86) today and will be made available for
OpenSolaris in the near future."
Yea ok when is that "near future" going to be? Anyone? Or is this more of the
usual marketing BS I'm growin
Erik Trimble said:
"That's OK. It was resolved off-list. No harm, no foul."
Yea but I'm still willing to own being a jerk publicly. Sorry about that. Blame
the lack of Phillip Morris's products in my bloodstream if you must. Usually I
try not to make personal attacks as that is an logical falla
Is there any particular reason you thought it would be something other than the
standard JVM?
Scott
--
Scott Rotondo
Senior Principal Engineer, Solaris Core OS Engineering
President, Trusted Computing Group
Phone: +1 650 786 6309 (Internal x86309)
On Jun 20, 2010, at 12:36 PM, "W. Wayne Liauh"
Hi Hernan,my friend!
Thanks noticing!we're looking forward to seeing new official release and
development release from new 'Oracle'.
but we have a 'bit' heard new one.but since Oracle and Sun merger,we
haven't seen on their website.
I will try soon if I have a time and hope Oracle would conti
25 matches
Mail list logo
