Thanks Alan.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Edward Martinez wrote:
> > I do consider 134 as an RC because it was said
> last year that next stable release would be 2010.02
> and be based from b 134 but how would that be
> possible, if build 134 was released on march 8?
>
> It wouldn't be, which is why that was never said.
>
> When th
On 14.06.2010 21:26, Rabindranath Seunarinesingh wrote:
> Thanks for the reply Thomas. I don't have a Sun card, so I guess the
> graphical install is out. Now, if I install via console, how can I give
> the user a GUI desktop? Will that be possible at all?
> BTW, I'm in the same noisy room with all
Rabindranath Seunarinesingh wrote:
> Thanks Alan, that piece of info seems to be the missing link in all of
> this. I have no problem installing via CLI/console, but does that mean I
> wouldn't be able to give the user a GUI desktop even if he connects to
> the server via the network?
No. He need
Edward Martinez wrote:
> I do consider 134 as an RC because it was said last year that next stable
> release would be 2010.02 and be based from b 134 but how would that be
> possible, if build 134 was released on march 8?
It wouldn't be, which is why that was never said.
When the plan was o
> There have been occasions where a FreeBSD RELEASE is
> not on time, but they typically have RC1, RC2, etc.,
> until the final RELEASE. Such as the case with
> FreeBSD 8.0. I believe there was only to be RC1 and
> RC2, but there were actually four release
> candidates.
>
> As with the case of a
rabindranath seunarine singh wrote:
> My apologies in advance if I'm posting this in the wrong place. I have a
> Netra240 server and I'd like to use a video card so I can get a graphical
> desktop. I put in a SIS 6326 PCI card, but my monitor just goes to sleep.
> Does anyone know if I need to a
On 14.06.2010 20:43, rabindranath seunarine singh wrote:
> My apologies in advance if I'm posting this in the wrong place. I have a
> Netra240 server and I'd like to use a video card so I can get a graphical
> desktop. I put in a SIS 6326 PCI card, but my monitor just goes to sleep.
> Does anyon
My apologies in advance if I'm posting this in the wrong place. I have a
Netra240 server and I'd like to use a video card so I can get a graphical
desktop. I put in a SIS 6326 PCI card, but my monitor just goes to sleep. Does
anyone know if I need to activate any settings in the server hardware
Yup, thank you Jörg for your email :)
5 years already ...
Few months later I started using SXCE on my good ol' Ultra 60 :)
Joyeux anniversaire !!!
Le 14/06/10 17:50, Sean Sprague a écrit :
Jörg
On June 14th 2005, OpenSolaris was made available to the public.
Today is June 14th 2010 and Ope
There have been occasions where a FreeBSD RELEASE is not on time, but they
typically have RC1, RC2, etc., until the final RELEASE. Such as the case with
FreeBSD 8.0. I believe there was only to be RC1 and RC2, but there were
actually four release candidates.
As with the case of a release taki
> Edward Martinez wrote:
> > I think the reason why we have been using build
> 134 that long is because the next stable release of
> opensolaris will be from build 134
> That is correct.
>
>
> -Alan Coopersmith-
> -alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
> Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X
Edward Martinez wrote:
> I think the reason why we have been using build 134 that long is because
> the next stable release of opensolaris will be from build 134
That is correct.
> I remember reading a while back that solaris 11 was going to be based from
> opensolaris snv_134.
That is n
Thank you for the heads-up, time to upgrade my station to 10.
Sent on the Sprint® Now Network from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Tim Scanlon
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 02:43:36
To:
Subject: [osol-discuss] Thank you Adobe - Flash 10.1 "rc" available
Before I plaster the link that
> 4 months we have been stuck on build 134, "4 months!"
> I don't call this progress, at this rate Oracle will
> have to push Solaris 10 out to update 40 before
> Solaris next is ready. The patch bundle for Solaris
> 10 is now so large that it takes 4 hours to patch
> from update 6 to update 8. Sol
Jörg
On June 14th 2005, OpenSolaris was made available to the public.
Today is June 14th 2010 and OpenSolaris is celebrating it's 5th
anniversary.
Thanks for the reminder. Happy 5th B'day to OpenSolaris indeed.
I hope that OpenSolaris still has a long life to expect in future
On June 14th 2005, OpenSolaris was made available to the public.
Today is June 14th 2010 and OpenSolaris is celebrating it's 5th
anniversary.
I hope that OpenSolaris still has a long life to expect in future
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berl
On 06/08/10 13:31, Jason King wrote:
> A fast-track case is describing more the review/approval process than
> how fast it's being putback. I'm sure there are many examples of
> fast-tracks that weren't integrated for many months (if not longer)
> from when they were filed.
>
Sometimes never. I
> > • New platform support
>
> Does this mean new driver support?
Indirectly it might. But I think it has always meant
running on new models of systems; that might mean
as much support for newer CPUs or newer chipsets
as for controllers and other sorts of devices.
Someone could always look thro
> • New platform support
Does this mean new driver support?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
4 months we have been stuck on build 134, "4 months!" I don't call this
progress, at this rate Oracle will have to push Solaris 10 out to update 40
before Solaris next is ready. The patch bundle for Solaris 10 is now so large
that it takes 4 hours to patch from update 6 to update 8. Solaris next
bsd wrote:
You're right. Someone will still be waiting after 120 days for customer
service to come back and help them. Why they continue to wait, who knows?
Your implication that a call can be logged with support and no customer
contact in 90-120 days is way outside of any kind of process a
You're right. Someone will still be waiting after 120 days for customer
service to come back and help them. Why they continue to wait, who knows?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@open
Simple:
it might be an EFI partition is required. It should be created with:
format -e
:)
rd...@znas:~$ ls -v /dev/dsk/c*d0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 58 апр. 19 09:03 /dev/dsk/c4t0d0 ->
../../devices/p...@0,0/pci8086,3...@9/pci15d9,5...@0/s...@0,0:wd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
Before I plaster the link that follows, I'd like to thank Adobe for their
support for Solaris & OpenSolaris. Yea, I know there's various GNU-ish projects
around, but I seriously dislike the GPL template license too. Not only that but
objectively Adobe's stuff is good software.
If I could, I'd e
"Richard L. Hamilton" wrote:
> Is the Solaris version of pax somehow superior to the
> open source implementation(s)? If not, then why not replace
> it with an open source version?
There is nothing like _the_ OSS implementation.
There are several OSS implementations and every implementation has
26 matches
Mail list logo
