> I can remember Larry offering condolences to the
> engineers in desktop back in '96 as PCs were going to
> be a thing of the past, and all of us would need to
> find other jobs to work on in the future as IT was
> going back to a mainframe type environment. Oddly
> people are still using PCs to t
We have been using automated installer so it is configured right. Today we
tried to install opensolaris again with the automated installer but there is
some kind of disk error and I cannot figure out how to fix it. Here is the log
r...@opensolaris:~# cat /tmp/install_log
/tmp/ai_combined_manife
> A very good read!
>
> http://static.reuters.com/resources/media/editorial/20
> 100513/Oracle.pdf
Easy to point the finger, but suffice to say that everything Larry touches does
not turn to gold.
Case in point is the "cubed processor", the "network computer" (Java based), as
well as others.
> > Good Evening,
> >
> >
> > I have a small Atom based NAS, running build 134, using a Silicon
> > Image 3124 controller and a raidz zpool with 5 disks - not using
> > anything funky like dedup, compression etc - however i seem to be
> > seeing this bug:
> >
> >
> > http://bugs.opensolar
Good Evening,
I have a small Atom based NAS, running build 134, using a Silicon Image 3124
controller and a raidz zpool with 5 disks - not using anything funky like
dedup, compression etc - however i seem to be seeing this bug:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=
You're just troll. You're not even BSD fan, because BSD is about pragmatic
approach to use what's appropriate for some situation. So I prefer OpenBSD and
Solaris/OpenSolaris, but work even with HP-UX, IBM AIX, a lot of Linuxes,
Windows, Mac Os X and so on. You even totally misunderstood what I w
My issue is not directly related to physical hard disk performance (even if
that is another point), but on RAMDISK performance.
Devsk is right: I am modelling memory performance.
A ramdisk without a file system on it (such as the one obtained using the
ramdisk create command) is like a raw disk.
On 26.05.2010 14:39, Ghee Teo wrote:
> sounded like a IBM marketing campaign here :)
Nah, just someone doing a heavy-duty reality-check on a penguinista. ;)
//Svein
--
+---+---
/"\ |Svein Skogen | sv...@d80.iso100.no
\ / |Solberg
sounded like a IBM marketing campaign here :)
On 05/26/10 12:02 PM, bsd wrote:
"Who cares about HP-UX or IBM AIX?"
Another Linux dolt spouting nonsense.
Linux doesn't even compare to AIX in any aspect. The cost-saving realization
of Linux is a pipe dream. Open source Xen that Linux uses is
hello all,
on my laptop, with os20xx.xx, b134, there is high disk usage since few
days, and i don't understand what is happening.
The laptop has 4Go RAM, CPU Core(tm)2 Duo CPU T9600 @ 2.80GHz
i limited the arc size in /etc/system at 1Go
iostat gives me:
r/sw/s kr/s kw/s wait actv
"Who cares about HP-UX or IBM AIX?"
Another Linux dolt spouting nonsense.
Linux doesn't even compare to AIX in any aspect. The cost-saving realization
of Linux is a pipe dream. Open source Xen that Linux uses is not even close to
DLPARs. Red Hat Cluster Suite or Linux heartbeat is a joke com
Hi,
The Desktop CBE tarball is now really obsolete and sadly, there is no
newer version available. There are some pretty good instructions here:
http://blogs.sun.com/mattman/entry/how_to_build_jds_on
but use the latest pkgbuild, not the version mentioned there.
Laca
On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 01:50
On 25/05/2010 17:10, Paul Gress wrote:
On 05/25/10 10:01 AM, Andrew Stormont wrote:
Is Oracle really closing OpenSolaris?
I didn't read that anywhere. My opinion, no. Opensolaris 2010.06
will be released soon. Then the development gate will open again.
To clarify - the development gat
Hi list,
I am trying to isntalle CBE (Common Build Environment). But it gives error
about dependencies:-
--
a...@opensolaris:~/jds-cbe-1.5$ ./cbe-install
Checking for required packages...
Package SUNWi2cs is required for building JDS
Would you like to install it now? [yes]: yes
Inst
14 matches
Mail list logo
