Re: [osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Yesterday I received a victim. "SuperServer 5026T-3RF 19" 2U, Intel X58, 1xCPU LGA1366 8xSAS/SATA hot-swap drive bays, 8 ports SAS LSI 1068E, 6 ports SATA-II Intel ICH10R, 2xGigabit Ethernet" and i have 2 ways Openfiler vs Opensolaris :) -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

I have a wee how-to here if it helps at all: http://davekoelmeyer.wordpress.com/2010/04/09/format-a-usb-flash-drive-with-fat32-on-opensolaris-x64/ -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opens

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 04/15/10 04:19 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> >> Chad Welsh wrote: >> >>> >>> Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones >>> inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the >>> balls

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 04/15/10 04:19 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Chad Welsh wrote: Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the balls off the release branch that should have continued. I assure you

[osol-discuss] Non Fud official speaking

I decided to read Oracles System News. There's a pretty good article that actually gives me a warm feeling about Opensolaris. The article is titled: Oracle's Hardware and Systems Support Policies Linked at: http://sun.systemnews.com/articles/146/1/hw/22995 Specifically: Article #22995 Volu

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

I've noticed something very interesting - firstly I did some packet captures of the 134 box talking to the Equalogic on port 3260 - it all looks ok until the Equalogic tells it that the target has moved to another IP in the cluster. This made me think about multipathing, and sure enough, it's en

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Calum Benson wrote: > On 14/04/2010 20:55, Ben wrote: > > Alan, I agree with everything you say. The problem is, as everyone >> keeps saying, that the community that isn't attached to the company >> knows nothing about what's going on. It's a tad frustrating get

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

> Slightly tangential, but it sounds like the Glassfish > community found > themselves in a similar situation recently. However, > Oracle just > released a roadmap that covers the future of both > their commercial and > open source offering > > I have no insight into whether Oracle will be doi

Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:31:25PM -0400, Paul Gress wrote: > Basically 2010.04 will be b134a or b134b, which is still upgrading from > b134. So it should work if you don't upgrade to >=b135 dev prior to > 2010.04. And, right here, we have one of the best user-focused reasons for pausing the

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 14/04/2010 20:55, Ben wrote: Alan, I agree with everything you say. The problem is, as everyone keeps saying, that the community that isn't attached to the company knows nothing about what's going on. It's a tad frustrating getting nothing from Oracle about the next release. Slightly tang

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 03:59:37AM -0700, Paul F wrote: > Basically iSCSI works perfectly under 0906 but not under snv_134. It's been stuffed for me since at least b~128. It works when the package is first installed. After a reboot, the svc start method exits with code 255 and no further clues.

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

Interesting - I found this: http://blogs.sun.com/dweibel/entry/solaris_ready_equallogic It's about Solaris 10, but OpenSolaris will use the new driver also - right? Note what it says about Equalogic firmware versions. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Albert Lee wrote: > > Yes, it outright *sucks* for adoption and awareness that the free CD > program has ended, but as it was through Sun's online stores it may just be > a side effect of the reorganisation of those stores that has affected the > purchasing other

Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] Fwd: [pkg-discuss] [REVIEW] backport-2009.06 fix for 11833

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:59 PM, Albert Lee wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:13:32 +0300, Martin Bochnig > wrote: >> Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to >> ignore the coding related lists. >> Maybe the subject gives a first clue or indicator, what Oracle plans >> for

Re: [osol-discuss] [ogb-discuss] Fwd: [pkg-discuss] [REVIEW] backport-2009.06 fix for 11833

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 21:13:32 +0300, Martin Bochnig wrote: > Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to > ignore the coding related lists. > Maybe the subject gives a first clue or indicator, what Oracle plans > for the future: Maybe the name 2009.06 stays the current release

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On 04/14/10 03:07 PM, Uros Nedic wrote: Canonical after *only* five years of operation became profitable Company. As late as Dec. 2009, Mark Shuttlesworth said they were not yet profitable: http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/68923.html?wlc=1271278394 Cheers, -Shawn

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Albert Lee wrote: > On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0300, Martin Bochnig > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett >> wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero >>> wrote: FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:41 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero >> wrote: >>> FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at >>> this tim

Re: [osol-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Jennifer Pioch wrote: 2010/4/14 "C. Bergström" : Umm.. #1 Roland is only handling the cli bits (Which with his help I replaced a long time ago in osunix) No, Roland has an own dropin replacement for libc_i18n.a using the FreeBSD and AST sources as base for his work. Are you re

Re: [osol-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gon na fork this sucker?

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:39:21 +0200, Jennifer Pioch wrote: > 2010/4/14 "C. Bergström" : >> Jennifer Pioch wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh wrote: >>> Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to save it from the hands of

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:41:19 +0300, Martin Bochnig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett > wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero >> wrote: >>> FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping >>> program at >>> this time. As a result, we have

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Calum Benson wrote: > On 14/04/2010 20:48, Andras Barna wrote: >> >> https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ > > And, ironically: > > > Cheeri, > Calum. Ohh:((( Thos dax

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

2010/4/14 ольга крыжановская : > Martin, this world becomes only bitter cold if people let it down. If > the community, Oracle included, sticks together and cooperates then > the world may become a warmer, more friendly place to all of us. Hi Olga, no. The only thing that helped me was moving eas

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On 14/04/2010 20:48, Andras Barna wrote: https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ And, ironically: Cheeri, Calum. -- CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Oracle Corporation, Ireland mailto:calum.benson a

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

Canonical after *only* five years of operation became profitable Company. Uros > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:54:59 +0300 > From: mar...@martux.org > To: andras.ba...@gmail.com > CC: website-disc...@opensolaris.org; opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org; > opensolaris-annou...@opensolaris.org > Subj

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

Martin, this world becomes only bitter cold if people let it down. If the community, Oracle included, sticks together and cooperates then the world may become a warmer, more friendly place to all of us. For your question about 'shipping disks for free' and a note to Derek/Valerie: Our family get t

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

> Alan Coopersmith wrote: I assure you I have not touched anyones balls. > Attacking the few > f us still willing to communicate in public just > further deteriorates > the communication you're going to get - believe me, > it's damn frustrating > for us as well, and hard as we learn the difference

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Andras Barna wrote: > https://shipit.ubuntu.com/ Oh, thanks for the link. Maybe Oracle could learn from them. But I'm afraid, they could rather learn from Oracle! Because if they ship stuff around for free, work for free and want to benefit more people, and not j

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Chris Pickett wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero wrote: >> FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at >> this time. As a result, we have removed all links and icons from the >> opensolaris.org site. If you wou

Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

On 04/14/10 03:17 PM, Shawn Walker wrote: On 04/14/10 01:33 PM, David E. Anderson wrote: While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when 2010.new comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get further along towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues ge

Re: [osol-discuss] [website-discuss] Free OpenSolaris CD no longer offered

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Derek Cicero wrote: > FYI - Oracle is no longer offering a free OpenSolaris CD shipping program at > this time. As a result, we have removed all links and icons from the > opensolaris.org site. If you would like to download OpenSolaris, please > visit the Downloads

Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

On 04/14/10 01:33 PM, David E. Anderson wrote: While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when 2010.new comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get further along towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues get resolved)? Just set your client to use

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

2010/4/14 Matthias Pfützner : > I can't manage that from my Nokia E71, and, yes, I quoted from a different > email... > > Sorry, it's not been directed at you, Martin! > > Matthias Ok, no problem. I can imagine it can be hairy, when sending reply-all from a phone ... Thanks for clarifying. %m

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

I can't manage that from my Nokia E71, and, yes, I quoted from a different email... Sorry, it's not been directed at you, Martin! Matthias -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Martin Bochnig An: matth...@pfuetzner.de Cc: pgr...@optonline.net, opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org Gesendet: 1

Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

While we're at it... I am running b134 and use the dev branch; when 2010.new comes out, how do I switch and stick with that until we get further along towards the 2010.Fall ( assuming these release issues get resolved)? On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote: > On Wed, Apr 14, 2

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

2010/4/14 Matthias Pfützner : >> They need their Opensolaris. > > THEIR? > > Who "owns" that distribution? > > And: if it's their's, they should be building it themselfes... > > Really, it seems, you do know what a community is, and how open source > works... > > Matthias You interchanged To:-f

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

They need their Opensolaris. THEIR? Who "owns" that distribution? And: if it's their's, they should be building it themselfes... Really, it seems, you do know what a community is, and how open source works... Matthias ___ opensolaris-discuss ma

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- But the difference was the community was informed.  It appears that everything was frozen.  I must say that I'm getting nervous.  I've been waiting since around the later b120's for b135, as this marked the first release with NWAM phase 1.  Now I see not even

[osol-discuss] Fwd: [pkg-discuss] [REVIEW] backport-2009.06 fix for 11833

Hello, I decided to forward this message, as most people seem to ignore the coding related lists. Maybe the subject gives a first clue or indicator, what Oracle plans for the future: Maybe the name 2009.06 stays the current release for a few more weeks. Whatever. It does not matter, because this is

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Paul Gress wrote: > On 04/14/10 01:34 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote: >> >> Sounds like you are experienced     ;-) > > > Personal attacks rarely will help you make your point so please stop it. > > > > I didn't take is as a personal attack, I saw the smiley face, it w

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 04/14/10 01:34 PM, Giovanni Tirloni wrote: Sounds like you are experienced ;-) Personal attacks rarely will help you make your point so please stop it. I didn't take is as a personal attack, I saw the smiley face, it was meant as a joke. Paul __

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Paul Gress wrote: > On 04/14/10 01:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: > > > How can it appear to be ^frozen^? > Then maybe you are not subscribed to the right lists. > > > > Appears and actual are two different things.  What I mean by appears is > nothing has been publis

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: > > During my life experience I learned one thing for sure: Distrust and > impatience DESTROY EVERYTHING. > Exactly, Oracle should pay attention to that. > > > My analogy on this situation is like the drug pusher giving drugs to kids > > f

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 04/14/10 01:11 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: How can it appear to be ^frozen^? Then maybe you are not subscribed to the right lists. Appears and actual are two different things. What I mean by appears is nothing has been published as in some form of a binary release for me to upgrade

Re: [osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > On 04-14-10, Paul Gress wrote: > > > I don't think he wants to start a new distro, he's looking to > publishb137. > > That's about it in a nutshell. I have no shortage of build servers and thus > I was thinking, if this is really open sou

Re: [osol-discuss] Crash analysis help - reboot after panic: Freeing a free IOMMU page: paddr=0xccca2000

Hi Brian, First off all let me thank you for your time spent on reading this issue. Regarding your comments , yes the defect 15601 has been logged by me .I will keep all those informations stored somewhere, and meantime if required i can upload the core file , and i haven't done so because i'm ena

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Paul Gress wrote: > On 04/14/10 12:12 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Paul Gress wrote: > > > If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't > anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137? > > > Every previous time we've

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 04/14/10 12:12 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Paul Gress wrote: If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137? Every previous time we've had a release in progress, updates to /dev stopped while

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

2010/4/14 Jennifer Pioch : > 2010/4/14 "C. Bergström" : >> Jennifer Pioch wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh wrote: >>> Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, v

Re: [osol-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

2010/4/14 "C. Bergström" : > Jennifer Pioch wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh wrote: >> >>> >>> Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project >>> to save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, >>> open source devouring

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

The question wasn't very clear, so here are my apologies. I was trying to ask if Oracle/Sun will maintain 2 different filesystems , ZFS and btrfs in two different platforms Open/Solaris and Linux, or if something can be merged along the way... I can imagine alot of customers with running linux serv

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Chad Welsh wrote: >> So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to >> protect what has been done so far? > > What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost > no developers working o

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Paul Gress wrote: > On 04/14/10 10:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > Chad Welsh wrote: > > > So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to > protect what has been done so far? > > > What would your fork do differently than the main project

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

C. Bergström wrote: > #2 TOG doesn't own the code in question. IBM is afaik the copyright > holder on the wide character things you're referencing in libc. TOS > only handles the UNIX tm and certification. (I know I've talked with > them quite a bit) As others have talked about the Citrus wide

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Chad Welsh wrote: >> Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones >> inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the >> balls off the release branch that should have continued. > >

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Chad Welsh wrote: > Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones > inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the > balls off the release branch that should have continued. I assure you I have not touched anyones balls. Attacking the few

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Paul Gress wrote: > If their pushing to the main OpenSolaris gates every day, why hasn't > anything been released. Why cannot I upgrade to b135, b136 or b137? Every previous time we've had a release in progress, updates to /dev stopped while the release was underway - when 2009.06 was being fina

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not b

Or boot off of an USB stick with a tools like RANISH on it, that can easily create the partition and also create a FS... http://www.ranish.com/part/ You (Richard Skelton) wrote: > Hi Sarah, > You need to type:- > mkfs -Fpcfs -o fat=32 /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p0:c -- Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49

Re: [osol-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

I would like to see brtfs under a BSD license that FreeBSD/OpenBSD/NetBSD can adopt it, too. Olga 2010/4/14 : > >>brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even >>complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS >>is too high end and works very poorly with

Re: [osol-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

>brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even >complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS >is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs >reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Both have license issues; Oracle can now re-lice

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

I tried to use my EQL support but since it's not happening with Solaris 10, they don't "support" opensolaris is what I was told. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] [pkg-discuss] pkg.sun.com

On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 21:03 -0500, weekleyj wrote: > On 4/13/10 8:53 PM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > > weekleyj wrote: > >> On 4/13/10 5:41 PM, Alex Bisoyannis wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> Is pkg.sun.com down? > >>> > >>> I am trying to add the extra repo, but I cannot reach

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Well maybe this distro will communicate with its people besides the ones inside the company about the status of its latest release since you cut the balls off the release branch that should have continued. close to a month of us wondering what the hell happened to 2010.03 and still nothing to th

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep developing only the Openstorage required portions of it, and adding to that the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last email on Friday 9/4), lets hope we will not be forced to move to bsd or

Re: [osol-discuss] [laptop-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Jennifer Pioch wrote: On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh wrote: Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first s

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not b

Hi Sarah, You need to type:- mkfs -Fpcfs -o fat=32 /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p0:c -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] brtfs on Solaris? (Re: [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?)

brtfs could be supported on Opensolaris, too. IMO it could even complement ZFS and spawn some concurrent development between both. ZFS is too high end and works very poorly with less than 2GB while brtfs reportedly works well with 128MB on ARM. Olga On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:31 PM, wrote: > > >

[osol-discuss] b137 based on tonic or otherwise

On 04-14-10, Paul Gress wrote:  > I don't think he wants to start a new distro, he's looking to publishb137. That's about it in a nutshell. I have no shortage of build servers and thus I was thinking, if this is really open source ( with redistributables ) then a person with a bit of experie

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

What ever happens to (Open)Solaris the new version of Solaris (Solaris Next again "Oracle Welcome Session") will surly be based of OpenSolaris.. I guess the only key word will be "Open" Andrew George Koutras wrote: I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep de

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

>Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ? >Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one >would be dropped? Which OS supports both? Linux support brtfs, Solaris supports ZFS. Casper ___ opensolar

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 04/14/10 10:56 AM, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Chad Welsh wrote: So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to protect what has been done so far? What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost no developers working on it, since

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On 14/04/2010 15:56, Alan Coopersmith wrote: Chad Welsh wrote: So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to protect what has been done so far? What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost no developers working on it, since a

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

Did you actually run a Windows "format" on that partition to get a real PCFS? The steps you listed only created a PARTITION into which you could then really create a FAT FS.. But you did not yet really CREATE that FAT FS, right? Matthias You (Sarah.kho) wrote: > > Hi, > Thank you for helpin

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Just a completely different question...is there any plans for btrfs ? Will ZFS and btrfs co-exist or there's a chance that the less used one would be dropped? Thanks, Bruno On 14-4-2010 16:50, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > George Koutras wrote: > >> the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@ora

Re: [osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

On 04-14-10, Matthias Pfützner wrote:  You (Dmitry) wrote: > 134 dev build, is suitable for this? I assume so, I don't have any specific infos. Some people seem to have a couple problems with 134, see:    http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=474302&tstart=0 > can i upgrade it

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

Okay. So you need following command: mkfs -F pcfs /dev/rdsk/c9t1d4p1 p0 is whole disk (including the partition table). Sorry I mistyped the mkfs command in the first e-mail. That was Linux syntax. Milan Dne 14.04.10 16:41, Sarah.kho napsal(a): Hi, Thank you for helping me on this. before ap

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Chad Welsh wrote: > So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to > protect what has been done so far? What would your fork do differently than the main project, besides have almost no developers working on it, since all the Oracle-paid developers would still be working o

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

Seems like this may be equalogic related. I have 16 targets imported into 8 mirrored pools from 4 openfiler systems and I don't seem to have any problems. On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Shawn wrote: > I also have almost this exact same problem on versions since 0906 on both > physical and vi

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

George Koutras wrote: >the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last >email on Friday 9/4), You need to check your mail filters. The archives show mail to indiana-discuss from oracle.com addresses since then (April 12 as most recent, since yesterday seems to have

Re: [osol-discuss] [indiana-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 5:30 PM, George Koutras wrote: > I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep > developing only the Openstorage required portions of it, and adding to that > the sudden silence in indiana-discuss from "@oracle.com" & "@sun.com" (last > email o

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

Hi, Thank you for helping me on this. before applying mkfs I tried the mount command as follow: mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 /media/s The command returns the following error: mount: /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 is not a DOS filesystem. So I tried the fstyp command on that partition and it says: unk

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

"man mount_pcfs" might help... ;-) The special argument can be one of two special device file types: oA floppy disk, such as /dev/diskette0 or /dev/diskette1. oA DOS logical drive on a hard disk expressed as device-

Re: [osol-discuss] Firefox 3.5.5 with SXCE can't load page

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Ian Collins wrote: > On 04/13/10 05:39 PM, Martin Bochnig wrote: >> >>  www.namecheap.com just takes a while, until it loads. >> But the statements relating to www.zoll.de are still valid. >> >> For over 3 weeks I tried to load that site several times per day. >>

Re: [osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

Close! All the partitions that end in sN (e.g. s0) are Solaris partitions (aka slices). All the Solaris slices reside in one fdisk partition. All the fdisk partitions end in pN (e.g. p0) So ... use: mount -F pcfs /dev/dsk/c9t1d4p0 /media/s emike On 04/14/2010 09:09 AM, Sarah.kho wrote

[osol-discuss] Created a FAT32 partition using Fdisk, but it can not be mounted..

Hi I created a fat32 partition using: format format>fdisk fdisk>1 and then C for fat32. then I exit the fdisk and format. To make sure that the partition is there, I entered the format and fdisk command and my partition was there (it was active as well). The disk name is c9t1d4 so I assumed t

Re: [osol-discuss] Firefox 3.5.5 with SXCE can't load page

Greatly appreciated! Thanks! -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

You (Dmitry) wrote: > 134 dev build, is suitable for this? I assume so, I don't have any specific infos. Some people seem to have a couple problems with 134, see: http://opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=474302&tstart=0 > can i upgrade it to realese in the future? Sure!

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_137 bfu

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 4:37 PM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > >> >> >> Dennis, ^porting^? >> How much porting work was required? >> You mean you took the Sun sfw src tarball and compiled it? >> > > GCC was by me, same as binutils, same as the grub bootloader for PowerPC > that you mentioned earlier, bas

Re: [osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

134 dev build, is suitable for this? can i upgrade it to realese in the future? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Chad Welsh wrote: > Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to > save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open > source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first step/person to > make

Re: [osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

> Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project > to save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, > open source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first > step/person to make this happen to protect what has been done so far? > >

Re: [osol-discuss] iSCSI broken in snv_134?

I also have almost this exact same problem on versions since 0906 on both physical and virtual OpenSolaris/EON builds. I usually have 4 iscsi volumes coming from the EQL boxes. I can almost always connect to one, but no more than one and I need all 4. -- This message posted from opensolaris.o

[osol-discuss] So when are we gonna fork this sucker?

Well we have heard from one of the OGB members about forking this project to save it from the hands of [b]"HOracle"[/b] the multi-headed, voracious, open source devouring monster. So, when and who might be the first step/person to make this happen to protect what has been done so far? Been nice

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_137 bfu

> > > Dennis, ^porting^? > How much porting work was required? > You mean you took the Sun sfw src tarball and compiled it? > GCC was by me, same as binutils, same as the grub bootloader for PowerPC that you mentioned earlier, bash was by Ken Mays, other bits were done by the Initworks team. Mar

Re: [osol-discuss] snv_137 bfu

On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: > > sorry for the brutal email snip but it is 03:10AM here and I have not > stopped in about 20 hours. I hate to say it .. but I love this stuff. > > Such a geek I know :-) > > Original Message

Re: [osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Because of your requirement of iSCSI, use the latest... ;-) You (Dmitry) wrote: > Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS? > I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI > > Thanks Matthias -- Matthias Pfützner | Tel.: +49 700 PFUETZNER | There are good marriages, Lichtenbergstr.73 | mailt

[osol-discuss] Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS (zfs)?

Which build is the most stable, mainly for NAS? I plann NAS zfs + CIFS,iSCSI Thanks -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Firefox 3.5.5 with SXCE can't load page

Hello, Most of the official Firefox on Solaris update ports are done over at the Mozilla FTP site by the Beijing team. You'll see Firefox 3.6.3 there as well as the new dev release. I used Seamonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.5.8, and Firefox 3.6.3 on the namecheap website and it instantly loaded. Firef

Re: [osol-discuss] Crash analysis help - reboot after panic: Freeing a free IOMMU page: paddr=0xccca2000

Hi Bruno, Googling for this panic, I see defect 15601 (http://defect.opensolaris.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=15601) has been logged, I suspect by you? If so, then I think you've already done just about everything I would expect of a bug finder - you've logged a bug including the panic message,

[osol-discuss] Crash analysis help - reboot after panic: Freeing a free IOMMU page: paddr=0xccca2000

Hi all, Recently one of the servers that my company uses , a Dell R710, attached to 2 Sun JBOD J4400 started to crash quite often. Finally i got a message in /var/adm/messages that might point to something usefull, but i don't have the expertise to start to troubleshooting this problem, so any h

  1   2   >