I'm following along here, after clearing my zpool.cache:
http://www.mail-archive.com/zfs-disc...@opensolaris.org/msg31904.html
Currently in a long zpool import.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolari
Masafumi Ohta wrote:
I filed my report to bugzilla 12196 - need to add "pci10de,6f1",so are
you going to add it to driver lists?
The documented device ID for GeForce G105M is pci10de,6ec.
Please send me (privately) the output of "prtconf -pv".
Once I verify the device ID, I will add it to
(2009/12/09 11:43), Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Masafumi Ohta wrote:
Hi Alan,
I filed my report to bugzilla 12196 - need to add "pci10de,6f1",so are
you going to add it to driver lists?
That question needs to be addressed to John, not me - I can't change
what devices the nvidia driver bi
Masafumi Ohta wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> I filed my report to bugzilla 12196 - need to add "pci10de,6f1",so are
> you going to add it to driver lists?
That question needs to be addressed to John, not me - I can't change
what devices the nvidia driver binds to - only John or Nvidia can.
--
-A
(2009/12/08 2:18), Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ken Mays wrote:
Hello,
The latest Nvidia 190.42 driver is not included on the latest snv_128a
development ISO yet.
It integrated to 129.
The next IPS update is expected to have the latest Nvidia 190.42 driver. I'm
expecting this IPS
The machine is booting again, still stuck at "Reading ZFS Config: *"
There is disk activity, so I can leave it to finish whatever it's doing, unless
someone has advice.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
op
Steps:
- Upgraded to 128a
- Upgraded one pool to v22
- Enabled dedup for pool
- Created new dataset, destroyed it, created again
- Started migrating a snapshot using zfs send/recv
- Weekly scrub started (slowly...)
- Machine stopped responding to input (maybe swap death)
- Rebooted
- Stuck at "Re
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Amos Deering wrote:
> Maybe I have done something wrong when I set it up.
>
> I will start from scratch.
>
> iSCSI is really the main thing, the Cifs was just a kicker.
>
> Any pointers on setting up COMSTAR iSCSI, I used the following link for my
> information.
>
Maybe I have done something wrong when I set it up.
I will start from scratch.
iSCSI is really the main thing, the Cifs was just a kicker.
Any pointers on setting up COMSTAR iSCSI, I used the following link for my
information.
http://wikis.sun.com/display/BluePrints/Provisioning+with+iSCSI+and
Hi Everett,
* Everett Batey (efba...@gmail.com) wrote:
> For those of us really old SunOS (68000 2/50 onward) / Unix
> (migrating to OSOL) folks is there a web based Acronym
> Soup list .. trying to get OSOL 09/06 up on Ultra10, min
> memory, hopefully with OSOL equivalent of VirtualBox .. with
>
For those of us really old SunOS (68000 2/50 onward) / Unix
(migrating to OSOL) folks is there a web based Acronym
Soup list .. trying to get OSOL 09/06 up on Ultra10, min
memory, hopefully with OSOL equivalent of VirtualBox .. with
SOUGOS (sudden old unix guy onset senility) I really need
help. O
It appears to be.
Would the owner/operator be open to the idea of allowing the mirroring of this
important resource?
/dale
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Jörg Stephan schrieb:
> [...]
> Why doesn't Linux support ZFS?
>
If does! In user mode through FUSE. Just the same way as, I've heard,
if you're really determined you can implement NTFS under OpenSolaris.
Francois
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Ian Allison wrote:
> I've submitted a bug report at bugs.opensolaris.org. It seems to be in
> the system (CR 6908102), but I can't find a URL for it by searching.
> I'll post it if I find it (or if I can fix the bug :)
bugs.opensolaris.org only updates from the internal database once a day,
so it
Hi Brian,
Thanks for all your help,
Brian Ruthven - Solaris Network Sustaining - Sun UK wrote:
Looking at the script, it would seem that by installing the packages you
mention, you've avoided the faulty bit of script. Nevertheless, in your
case it's fixed your problem, but there still exists s
John Martin wrote:
Paul Gress wrote:
Any word on 195.22 beta yet. I've downloaded this one already, but
it requires a lot of work to install it and is not integrated
properly into Opensolaris (VM).
As you note it is still beta, so it isn't a candidate for
bunding. The Sun version of this dri
(REPOST) Anxious to find other DOD/DON users with
Open Solaris on SPARC. A survival issue.
Off net answers okay to e...@cotdazr.org
--
R/ Ev Batey, Navy, Port Hueneme CA
IM (DCO): everett.ba...@navy.mil
Office: DSN 296-7180 / VA 703 879-6471
Cell & Days: (805) 616-2471
smime.p7s
Wow! Didnt expect this much reply,
so thanks to all.
I think i understood most of the "problems" if they are a problem.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1) Sure. Then why do you talk about school? I know a lot of people which
weren't able to successfully end their primary school and they are real gurus
now because they learned it by them self. Because people are different? People
from Unix world use mainly words 'package manager' and people from
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
Jörg Stephan schrieb:
Hi there,
at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+ with
1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there where
some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me to understand why i
No, expectations of a stable file server while doing iscsi/cifs/nfs are
reasonable. I wish I had the skills to help you troubleshoot, but sadly I do
not. My only recommendation is to get Sun support if you can swing it, and work
with them towards a solution. My experience with Sun support was po
Jörg Stephan wrote:
Hi there,
at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+ with
1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there where
some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me to understand why it is
and when it will work
1.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 06:10:40AM -0800, J??rg Stephan wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+
> with 1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there
> where some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Jörg Stephan
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+
> with 1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there
> where some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me to understa
1) Buy more memory. Update OpenSolaris trough dev repository and post outputs
of 'vmstat 1 10' and 'top' commands
2) It's OpenSolaris. Read about ZFS first, try it and you will hate ext* very
quickly.
3) Memory and maybe some problem with your HW thanks to info that your
installation take 95%
Jörg Stephan schrieb:
> Hi there,
>
> at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+
> with 1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there
> where some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me to understand why
> it is and when it wi
Jörg Stephan wrote:
> 4. Why doenst + switch to an console? Or better question... Where is
> the console?
Because you're using 2009.06 and the implementation of virtual consoles wasn't
finished until after that. To get to the text console in 2009.06, stop gdm & X
by running 'svcadm disable -t g
Hi there,
at the weekend i installed OpenSolaris 2009.06 on an AMD Athlon64 X2 5200+ with
1GB DDR Ram. I wanted to try virtualization with VirtualBox. But i there where
some things i really dont like, maybe you can help me to understand why it is
and when it will work
1. Why uses OpenSolaris 9
1) It does not need to do with school. It is with using multiple words to name
the software. manuals call it solaris installation gui, people and opensolaris
calls it package manager. kudos to following naming consistency. Companies are
more frugal than individuals in any economic situation. Do
29 matches
Mail list logo
