Re: [osol-discuss] upgrade to 118 broke cheese

2009-07-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
Sorry, I meant to say try typing in: ls -l /dev/video0 not ls -l /dev/video -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] upgrade to 118 broke cheese

2009-07-17 Thread Anon Y Mous
What do you get as output when you run these commands: ls -l /dev/video isainfo -kv prtdiag -v pfexec scanpci -v Can you run those commands and copy and paste the output here? Also, what does the device driver utility say when you run this command: /usr/ddu/ddu.py & in a terminal? --

Re: [osol-discuss] 117 and 118 updates will not boot on Gateway laptop

2009-07-17 Thread Rik Scarborough
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote: > > > I'm not sure how to get a copy of the boot log. > > > > Boot to single user mode by editng the kernel line at the grub prompt. > > > > I would add " -ks", or " -kv". -k enables the kernel > debugger; I suspect the system gets a panic, and

[osol-discuss] Fwd: 117 and 118 updates will not boot on Gateway laptop

2009-07-17 Thread Rik Scarborough
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Rik Scarborough > writes: > > > Hi, > > > > I am currently, and successfully, running 111b on a Gateway AMD64 laptop. > I > > have tried to upgrade to 117 and also 118 and OpenSolaris will not boot. > > > > It seems to get to mounting the z

[osol-discuss] zpool failure after fdisk

2009-07-17 Thread Mike DeMarco
I had a zpool create on fdisk partition 3 of my harddrive. Using fdisk a deleted partition 2 so I could recreate it. When I deleted partition 2 partition 3 became partition 2 and my newly created partition is now partition 3. So now the zpool is on partition 2 but the zpool configuration still t

[osol-discuss] Newest/Best way to join Windows Domain

2009-07-17 Thread Chris
Considering building a OpenSolaris based NAS/SAN for a client and they are Windows 2003 AD based currently. I have found several blog posts, etc each having slightly different ways to join the windows domain to use it for authentication. Then I cam across this link: http://docs.sun.com/app/doc

Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118

2009-07-17 Thread Jürgen Keil
> As I mentioned in another reply further down, if I > try to start hal manually I get a segmentation fault > almost immediately after running the command (well, > immediately in terms of seconds, but hal does make > some progress in detecting quite a few devices before > it quits) Is there a core

Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118

2009-07-17 Thread Sean McGrath
Matthew Stevenson stated: < The log file has 4 lines for each time the system boots, for example: < < [ Jul 17 22:00:33 Enabled. ] < [ Jul 17 22:01:08 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/svc-al start"). ] < hal failed to start: error 1 < [ Jul 17 22:01:16 Method "start" exited with status 95.

Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118

2009-07-17 Thread Matthew Stevenson
The log file has 4 lines for each time the system boots, for example: [ Jul 17 22:00:33 Enabled. ] [ Jul 17 22:01:08 Executing start method ("/lib/svc/method/svc-al start"). ] hal failed to start: error 1 [ Jul 17 22:01:16 Method "start" exited with status 95. ] So about 35 seconds after it is en

Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?

2009-07-17 Thread Alan Coopersmith
UNIX admin wrote: > I'd just like someone to tell me just how I'm supposed to remove my Oracle > database with an IPS package. And if anyone writes "SMF", then I'd like to > know just how exactly will I run an SMF method to remove a database, when IPS > doesn't allow scripting. By using the IPS

Re: [osol-discuss] HAL fails to start after upgrade to 118

2009-07-17 Thread Matthew Stevenson
> I had a hal failure yesterday after updating from 114 > to 117, it was caused by some > renamed packages (in my case, SUNWdbus-bindings > became SUNWdbis-glib and a > number of other per-language packages). How did you find out which packages needed installing though? > > If running "/usr/lib

Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?

2009-07-17 Thread Glynn Foster
On 17/07/2009, at 12:05 PM, UNIX admin wrote: (Though unlike the other part of your suggestion, we're not going to maintain a separate install & packaging system for Solaris, but will replace Solaris Express with the OpenSolaris installer & packaging.) That's lovely; you (plural) will phase o

Re: [osol-discuss] Quick reboot options

2009-07-17 Thread Jürgen Keil
> Maybe I get the fast-reboot idea a bit wrong? Where's the interception point > for > reloading kernel - is it part of GRUB or some minimalistic routine started > after > GRUB has forwarded the execution to the selected OS image? fast reboot bypasses grub. The new kernel is loaded by the curr

Re: [osol-discuss] System will not suspend

2009-07-17 Thread Jürgen Keil
> Ok I tried that but couldn't get anything to show up > in Hyperterminal. Tried a number of different entries > in the grub file from searching other forum posts, > but still nothing. Hypterminal would say "connected" > but would only display a constant flashing cursor, > nothing else. The serial

Re: [osol-discuss] Is Oracle getting ready to kill OpenSolaris?

2009-07-17 Thread UNIX admin
> (Though unlike the other part of your suggestion, > we're not going to > maintain a separate install & packaging system for > Solaris, but will > replace Solaris Express with the OpenSolaris > installer & packaging.) That's lovely; you (plural) will phase out a stable packaging subsystem in fa

Re: [osol-discuss] 117 and 118 updates will not boot on Gateway laptop

2009-07-17 Thread Jürgen Keil
> > I'm not sure how to get a copy of the boot log. > > Boot to single user mode by editng the kernel line at the grub prompt. > > I don't remember exactly what it takes but I'd try disabling the gui stuff > first on the current boot line press` e' (edit mode), then > > remove splash line >

Re: [osol-discuss] What happened to my root cron!?

2009-07-17 Thread William Bauer
Not that anyone has responded, but it happened to yet another computer. Same lines left behind, same ones deleted. I got an email when it happened, simply: The error on fnog was "No such file or directory" The crontab file is there but truncated to the last two lines, as in all other incident

Re: [osol-discuss] not seeing the second sata disk or the attached usb disk

2009-07-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Asif Iqbal wrote: > any idea why the OS not seeing the second sata disk or the attached > usb disk on this x2100 m2 ? > > Jul 17 15:22:44 lab-dweb-01 genunix: [ID 943908 kern.notice] Copyright > 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc.  All rights reserved. > Jul 17 15:22:

[osol-discuss] not seeing the second sata disk or the attached usb disk

2009-07-17 Thread Asif Iqbal
any idea why the OS not seeing the second sata disk or the attached usb disk on this x2100 m2 ? Jul 17 15:22:44 lab-dweb-01 genunix: [ID 943908 kern.notice] Copyright 1983-2009 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. Jul 17 15:22:44 lab-dweb-01 Use is subject to license terms. Jul 17 15:22:44

Re: [osol-discuss] 117 and 118 updates will not boot on Gateway laptop

2009-07-17 Thread Harry Putnam
Rik Scarborough writes: > Hi, > > I am currently, and successfully, running 111b on a Gateway AMD64 laptop. I > have tried to upgrade to 117 and also 118 and OpenSolaris will not boot. > > It seems to get to mounting the zfs drives and begins throwing errors, then > says something to the effect

[osol-discuss] Huawei usb modem hot plugging patch new version

2009-07-17 Thread Kazuhiko Kobayashi
Hi. I updated huawei patch. http://chototsumoushinp.dip.jp/solaris/huawei.snv111b.tar.bz2 change log: Jul 10 2009 fix: hot plugging problem with Intel chipset. Thanks. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list open

[osol-discuss] 117 and 118 updates will not boot on Gateway laptop

2009-07-17 Thread Rik Scarborough
Hi, I am currently, and successfully, running 111b on a Gateway AMD64 laptop. I have tried to upgrade to 117 and also 118 and OpenSolaris will not boot. It seems to get to mounting the zfs drives and begins throwing errors, then says something to the effect of syncing done and reboots the comput

Re: [osol-discuss] How to analyse a heap corruption dump

2009-07-17 Thread Ian Collins
Girish wrote: The problem is not reproducible but happens once in a while. we do not have a use case to reproduce the problem. We used tools like purify and libumem to find any memory corruption but did not help much. Using the core can we narrow down this problem. Need your help with this.

[osol-discuss] How to analyse a heap corruption dump

2009-07-17 Thread Girish
The problem is not reproducible but happens once in a while. we do not have a use case to reproduce the problem. We used tools like purify and libumem to find any memory corruption but did not help much. Using the core can we narrow down this problem. Need your help with this. ffbf7eb0 libc.so.

Re: [osol-discuss] Logical drive

2009-07-17 Thread Bartlomiej Pelc
If you mean extended partition, then the answer is "no". OpenSolaris can only be installed on primary partition. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org