!!! ONLY 1 MORE DAY !!!
The deadline for package submissions is May 8th at 12:00pm midnight PDT.
Since it will take sometime for the final set of packages to be posted
to the contrib repo, we will send out a list of all the packages approved
at the above time. Any packages that have been entered
Sean McGrath wrote:
A nice graphical view of the boot is at:
http://blogs.sun.com/eschrock/date/20050106#boot_chart_results
its from 2005, but still shows init, autopush, soconfig, and svc.startd.
- as well as every process thereafter untill the last script in etc/rc3.d
has been
# format -e
format> label
It will ask what label type you want. Choose "SMI".
"SOBRAL Thiago" writes:
> Searching the internet, I found that I need to change from EFI to SMI.
>
>
>
> I tried to follow the tips, but it didn´t work.
>
>
>
> Could you please help me ?
>
>
>
> Sobral
>
>
James Carlson stated:
< Nischal writes:
< > can anyone please explain me the boot process in opensolaris? I would like
somebody to explain the boot process at the process level like what forks and
what execs and so on ( our textbooks say that init forks and execs getty, login
blah blah... which
Searching the internet, I found that I need to change from EFI to SMI.
I tried to follow the tips, but it didn´t work.
Could you please help me ?
Sobral
De: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org
[mailto:opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.or
Hi everyone,
Please, I need to create a new volume in the 6540 StorageTek Array and
an old LUN has this label:
partition> p
Current partition table (original):
Total disk cylinders available: 24248 + 2 (reserved cylinders)
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBl
Joerg Schilling wrote:
al...@x11x:/tmp [8:12am - 9] cat > foo.c
#include
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
printf("Goodbye cruel world\n");
}
al...@x11x:/tmp [8:13am - 10] perl -i -p -e 's/\n/\r\n/' foo.c
al...@x11x:/tmp [8:13am - 11] cc foo.c
"foo.c", line 1: warning: invalid white spa
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> > I have seen a lot of code written on microsoft and compiled iside a single
> > source tree on many platforms using the schily makefile system. I've never
> > seen
> > the problem you describe. What is the exact problem you see?
>
> I don't see what your makefile sys
Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Alan:
>
>> The upstream project adopted changes while porting to Microsoft Visual C
>> that made it easier to adapt to Studio 12 as well, so that is now working
>> for us, though it may still be a problem for other code written for gcc.
>> The one issue remaining there th
Hi Martin,
I booted from the LiveCD, modified the kernel Grub entry to -s and succeeded to
get to single user mode. I tried to remove the SUNWlsimega driver with "pkgrm
SUNWlsimega" but this failed.
So I modified the /etc/driver_aliases so that lsimega entries are as follows to
match the entrie
Alan:
The upstream project adopted changes while porting to Microsoft Visual C
that made it easier to adapt to Studio 12 as well, so that is now working
for us, though it may still be a problem for other code written for gcc.
The one issue remaining there that I've been meaning to ask about is
Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>
>> While not a stopper, since we can easily fix every time we hit it, it would
>> be amazingly nice if Sun Studio learned how to ignore \r at the end of lines,
>> so that those of us working on cross-platform open source projects don't face
>>
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> While not a stopper, since we can easily fix every time we hit it, it would
> be amazingly nice if Sun Studio learned how to ignore \r at the end of lines,
> so that those of us working on cross-platform open source projects don't face
> thousands of "Invalid whitespace
Darryl Gove wrote:
> Alan, are you still having issues with the MMX/SSE intrinsics. If so,
> perhaps you can provide me with more details so that we can better
> evaluate the problem.
The upstream project adopted changes while porting to Microsoft Visual C
that made it easier to adapt to Studio 12
Marco Stadler writes:
> May 6 09:30:38 tank genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff00043c1b30
> zfs:dbuf_
> write_ready+1e7 ()
> May 6 09:30:38 tank genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ff00043c1b60
> zfs:arc_w
> rite_ready+2c ()
There seem to be several bugs filed with somewhat similar symptoms
I'm curious about the < installation, clean unintallation of OS and
applications,
formatting and partitioning of hard disk,checking errors and defragmentation,
very less or no unix commands, >part. Unless they have changed the installer it
will be the entire hd forget about primary or logical par
Hi
I do have panics on regular (about once per week) basis. Can anybody
tell me, what is going wrong on my machine. I'm running this version,
but it was the case with all previous versions as well.
SunOS Release 5.11 Version snv_111 64-bit
Thanks
Marco
messages log:
May 6 09:30:38 tank unix:
Hi
In general OpenSolaris project should focus expand hardware support.
Have been using Solaris on x86 hardware since Solaris 7.
And always hardware/driver support has been real nightmare.
More supported hardware , more (potential) users.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Hi,
is possible install Solaris 8 Migration Assistant on Solaris CE11 ?
Thank bye
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
