[osol-discuss] How can i make my zpool as faulted.

2008-10-16 Thread yuvraj
Hi Friends, I have create my own Zpool on Solaris 10 & also created ZFS for the same. Now i wanna make that zpool as a faulted one. If you are aware of those command. Please do reply for the same problem. You may reply me on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks in advance.

Re: [osol-discuss] SUNWlucfg not found on Solaris 10 11/06 DVD image

2008-10-16 Thread John Brewer
Signup your sunsolve.sun.com account for registration of Solaris see http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/805-7228/6j6q7ueor?a=view And then ether use updatemanager or smpatch analyze ; smpatch download and apply alll the latest patches with smpatch update commands. Then mount your iso or dvd i.e: m

Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels

2008-10-16 Thread Jason King
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:08 PM, Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Brian Cameron wrote: > > > I worked on the Sun Management Center project from 1999-2001. > > You would admit that on a public fora? *gd&r* > > -- > > Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group > ___

Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels

2008-10-16 Thread Alan DuBoff
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Brian Cameron wrote: > I worked on the Sun Management Center project from 1999-2001. You would admit that on a public fora? *gd&r* -- Alan DuBoff - Solaris x86 IHV/OEM Group ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels

2008-10-16 Thread Brian Cameron
Peter: > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If someone wanted to make a really great set of system tools for >> Solaris, then why not base it on something like the old Sun >> Management Center and use SNMP. > > SunMC? Which version? To be honest, I'm no

Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels

2008-10-16 Thread Peter Schow
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:43:46PM +0100, Peter Tribble wrote: > I actually find snmp rather limited; I'm planning on having a system where > all telemetry (kstats and the whole kitchen sink) is remotely accessible. Would you agree that this is not a limitation of the SNMP protocol itself but ins

[osol-discuss] NV99 failure during Jumpstart

2008-10-16 Thread Vincent Fox
I get this odd error during Jumpstart install of nv99: SUNWiir..done. 311.40 Mbytes remaining. SUNWiiu..done. 310.67 Mbytes remaining. SUNWima..done. 310.53 Mbytes remaining. Completed software inst

Re: [osol-discuss] Simple Panels

2008-10-16 Thread Peter Tribble
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If someone wanted to make a really great set of system tools for > Solaris, then why not base it on something like the old Sun > Management Center and use SNMP. SunMC? Which version? I actually liked SyMON 1.x. It was a

[osol-discuss] NIC chipset for SunFire X4000 series servers?

2008-10-16 Thread Nicholas Barsotti
Hello, I am having a lot of difficulties with the onboard Intel 82541GI nics and a PCI Intel 82541PI nic. I have a Realtek RTL-8169 that seems to work OK, but I know its not a real high performance nic. Can someone please tell me what type of chip is used in the Sun SunFire X4000 series serve

Re: [osol-discuss] Best practice recommendations for ZFS + Virtualbox

2008-10-16 Thread Orvar Korvar
Also see the Virtualbox forum. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] solaris 10 desktop plans [was Re: Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86]

2008-10-16 Thread James Carlson
Michael E. Thomadakis writes: > Now something irrelevant to acroread but very relevant to other concerns > for more updtodate desktop for Solaris: Is SUN planning on releasing a > more uptodate graphical desktop for Solaris10? I think that's probably a question for your local Sun representative.

Re: [osol-discuss] Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2008-10-16 Thread Michael E. Thomadakis
I see I've just finished entering 'feature request' in their site and I saw your message. Now something irrelevant to acroread but very relevant to other concerns for more updtodate desktop for Solaris: Is SUN planning on releasing a more uptodate graphical desktop for Solaris10? I th

Re: [osol-discuss] [distribution-discuss] BeleniX Package Repository now online!

2008-10-16 Thread Martin Bochnig
Awesome work, congrats! To have you as "competing" distro is a tough business ;-) BeleniX is an asset to opensolaris.org . I wonder how they could have created Indiana without it, anyway so quickly ... I should try out your distro more frequently. Chances are I can learn something from more clos

Re: [osol-discuss] Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2008-10-16 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Michael E. Thomadakis wrote: > Now something irrelevant to acroread but very relevant to other concerns > for more updtodate desktop for Solaris: Is SUN planning on releasing a > more uptodate graphical desktop for Solaris10? Not at this time - most of the Solaris desktop work is being focused on

Re: [osol-discuss] Minmal install CD?

2008-10-16 Thread Paul Harper
In my case I would be looking for a minimal graphical install with X. I have seen a number of posts from people looking for an OpenSolaris server install with no X. I have directed them to Milax server to them several times. Otherwise it is SXDE which is also cool too. I come from a debian/ubun

[osol-discuss] dmake on part of workspace took too much time

2008-10-16 Thread shelly
i changed zfs_vnops.c and wanted to build it. so performed these steps-> 1) bldenv -d ./opensolaris.sh 2) in usr/src/uts/ -> i did dmake common/fs/zfs/ it took 11 mins. is this time normal for building a part of workspace. can this be optimised -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _

Re: [osol-discuss] Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2008-10-16 Thread Casper . Dik
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>> I've been a "heavy" PDF user (both generating and viewign on my AMD64 >>> Solaris10 box. I think it ma >>> >> kes little sense NOT to have the latest Adobe's acroread on this platform. >> >>> Is there any discussion about letting Adobe make it available? >

Re: [osol-discuss] Adobe Acrobat for Solaris x86

2008-10-16 Thread Ian Collins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> I've been a "heavy" PDF user (both generating and viewign on my AMD64 >> Solaris10 box. I think it ma >> > kes little sense NOT to have the latest Adobe's acroread on this platform. > >> Is there any discussion about letting Adobe make it available? >> >