Dear all,
I'd like to install openSolaris (2008.5) on my notebook (Benq S41),
unfortunately it hang on first boot install (stopped after showing
copyright). Before that, I installed solaris 10 succesfully.
Any ideas? any helps will be appreciated. thanks
Regards,
agung
_
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 4:58 PM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 16:01:28 -0400
> "Fredrich Maney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:23:45 PDT "Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PRO
>Orvar Korvar wrote:
>Ok, so we can get no further on this issue? I revert back, to get at least
>>1400x1050? And 2560x1600 is out of the question?
No, there might have been a bug as here is my data from my Radeon HD 4870
hooked to a Viewsonic G90f (sxce_b84, max resolution 1920x1440):
1. xran
This page needs a few more mirrors added :
http://www.opensolaris.com/get/index.html
Please see :
http://blastwave.unix-center.net/OpenSolaris
That *should* automagically select the correct locale of en or cn and
drop you int othese pages :
http://blastwave.unix-center.net/OpenSolaris/i
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
>> Jesse Lehman wrote:
>>> Can anybody recommend a wireless adapter that works
>> out-of-the-box with OpenSolaris 2008.05? I tried
>> going back to Slackware, but I miss ZFS from my
>> OpenSolaris test. Unfortunately, my current adapter
>> (a Belkin F5D7050 v2000) simpl
Thanks for the help. I actually have two Belkin adapters (one broke), and the
one I'm using now is really a v3000 F5D7050. It should be supported by the rum
driver, but I'm having some difficulties (I posted in laptop-discuss with those
issues).
Belkin is a rather nasty company to work with,
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:32 AM, Joerg Schilling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Doing this should fix the problem:
>>
>> % pfexec pkg install SUNWscp
>
> BTW: I am still interested in an answer for the pfexec usage
>
> If you like to propagate the ma
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:23:45 PDT "Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
[...]
> The FOSS systems went from the model Solaris is still using, with
> package-specific directory trees - to a flatter model, folding
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 04:23:45 PDT "Richard L. Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > My 1st consern is installation of programs. It
> > couldn't be more difficult! Yes installing from the
> > Package Manager is easy, but thats the end of it. The
> > file system with all of the weirdly named folde
Are there any details posted regarding this bugid ?
Was this the bug that caused some processes that are assigned a fixed
class via priocntl to get pinned/wedged/hung ?
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6450494
Dennis Clarke
___
opensolaris
On Thu, 3 Jul 2008 19:59:58 +0200
a b <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I can only think of one instance where this
> > behavior makes sense, but haven't dealt with IRIX to know if that's
> > what you mean. Basically, the only time an OS update should *ever*
> > muck with third party software is if t
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 3:38 PM, David Korn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Re: [shell-discuss] [osol-discuss] ksh93-integration 2008-06-24
> update binaries available for download (for Solaris Nevada >= B84+Indiana)
> ...
> -
without the first user having to log off. This would allow all applications on
the workstation to remain open and the second user could take over for the
first without the interruption of the logout/login process, but would keep
audits correct. I've used the 'pcred' command to change the first
the S9 is runing on disk0, and I need to upgrade the S10 in disk1. in the
meanwhile all services are working . then I reboot the machine to disk1, so
that I can make the services down as short as possible.
In such process, My request comes out.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Siegfried Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for your ideas.
>
> Normally my transfer of one byte needs about 3 - 4 microseconds (i have
> mentioned). Sometimes we need up to 50 - 80 microseconds for one byte.
> So i think other threads or processes gets the cpu and my driver was
> Jesse Lehman wrote:
> > Can anybody recommend a wireless adapter that works
> out-of-the-box with OpenSolaris 2008.05? I tried
> going back to Slackware, but I miss ZFS from my
> OpenSolaris test. Unfortunately, my current adapter
> (a Belkin F5D7050 v2000) simply doesn't work with
> 2008.05.
> Hi, I don't know if this is the correct area to post
> these, if this isn't then please feel free to move it
> to the designated area.
cc-ing opensolaris-discuss, which is probably better. I'm
not quite sure what the program-team list is for, but I suspect
it's for something rather narrow and mo
Hi Joerg,
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 10:32:03AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Doing this should fix the problem:
> >
> > % pfexec pkg install SUNWscp
>
> BTW: I am still interested in an answer for the pfexec usage
>
> If you like to
Jesse Lehman wrote:
> Can anybody recommend a wireless adapter that works out-of-the-box with
> OpenSolaris 2008.05? I tried going back to Slackware, but I miss ZFS from my
> OpenSolaris test. Unfortunately, my current adapter (a Belkin F5D7050 v2000)
> simply doesn't work with 2008.05. Here
James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Doing this should fix the problem:
>
> % pfexec pkg install SUNWscp
BTW: I am still interested in an answer for the pfexec usage
If you like to propagate the manual use of pfexec, you would need to
make the pf*sh shells outdated.
People who have
20 matches
Mail list logo
