opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

2008-04-15 Thread Replica Jacob watch
www.IcedOutPlanet.tk www.IcedOutPlanet.tk Check out www.IcedOutPlanet.tk for the best quality Jacob Watches. We have over 100 different styles and can get ANY Jacob Watch! Cheapest price online and we do not use drop shipping! We ship ourselves. Talk to me on MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [osol-discuss] Is there a way to lock a third party application in memory?

2008-04-15 Thread Stephen Lau
Lieting Yu wrote: > I need to lock an application in memory but I can not add mlock/mlockall as I > don't have the source code or it's not feasible. Is there a way to achieve > this? I am thinking about disabling swap, but it does not seem to be a clean > solution. Any suggestion? > > Thanks, >

[osol-discuss] Is there a way to lock a third party application in memory?

2008-04-15 Thread Lieting Yu
I need to lock an application in memory but I can not add mlock/mlockall as I don't have the source code or it's not feasible. Is there a way to achieve this? I am thinking about disabling swap, but it does not seem to be a clean solution. Any suggestion? Thanks, Lieting This message poste

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread Joe Little
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Runar Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am in need of a NAS at home, I am currently running Linux (ubuntu), but I > would like to have a look at opensolaris and especially ZFS and Zones. My > problem is that I don't really know what hardware to buy, sin

[osol-discuss] Belenix 0.7 is available !

2008-04-15 Thread S h i v
Dello All, After a long gap and lots of things happening behind the scenes, we are pleased to announce the availability of BeleniX 0.7. This release marks a considerable change in the evolution of BeleniX. With 0.7, BeleniX is now a source level derivative of Project Indiana. As such it has most

[osol-discuss] RadeonHD 1.2.0 video driver release

2008-04-15 Thread ken mays
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/radeonhd Version 1.2.0 Added support for RV620, RV635, and R680. Added 2D acceleration for R5xx (including RS6xx), both XAA and EXA. Added support for DDIA block (second digital output) on RS690. Added support for interlaced modes Added additional layers for splitting

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right - I'm merely pointing out that you said "I see no relation between > this syntax and cdrecord.", but your original email suggested he could > use cdrecord. So the relation is that he can't use cdrecord under > Windows with UNC paths. > > Just tryi

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Stephen Lau
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Joerg Schilling wrote: >> >>> "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention >>> This

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joerg Schilling wrote: > > "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> well: > >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention > >> > > > > This uses non-standard path name separators and it is something th

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Stephen Lau
Joerg Schilling wrote: > "Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> well: >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention >> > > This uses non-standard path name separators and it is something that has been > given up on UNIX around 1986. > > I see no r

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Andras Barna" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention This uses non-standard path name separators and it is something that has been given up on UNIX around 1986. I see no relation between this syntax and cdrecord. > Jaso

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Andras Barna
well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_%28computing%29#Uniform_Naming_Convention Jason, last resort if it really not works.. u can copy the ISO to cdrecord's dir or vice-versa .. not a big deal I suggest cdrecord too, it works well on any platform, iirc I had problems with nero too, with non-wi

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Jason J. W. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Joerg, > > Thanks for the link. Unfortunately, cdrecord requires Cygwin and > doesn't work well with UNC paths. What is UNC? cdrecord works with the standard path name conventions. Jörg -- EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D

[osol-discuss] ZFS w/ NFSv4 still crashing after patch

2008-04-15 Thread Rustam
It seems that all community moved from Solaris forums here, so I'm actually re-posting my original post. I've Solaris 10U4 running on x86/64 with 127729-07 patch applied (nfs large file panic zfs). I've 1TB ZFS pool with over million files (mainly small, mails) and folders shared and accessed o

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread Ian Collins
andrew wrote: > Sounds like the file has been corrupted. Try downloading it again. > > Check the md5 hash first! Ian ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE b86 SPARC Single Image ISO & Nero Issues

2008-04-15 Thread andrew
Sounds like the file has been corrupted. Try downloading it again. Andrew. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Linux network drivers

2008-04-15 Thread Ian Collins
Emmanuel De Paepe wrote: > I have currenlty a notebook that runs on Mandriva. > It's the only Linux/Unix OS that finds the wireless adapter (Atheros). > It's actually one of the few Atheros drivers which does not have a Solaris > driver. > Is it possible to use this driver in Solaris. > So I gues

[osol-discuss] Linux network drivers

2008-04-15 Thread Emmanuel De Paepe
I have currenlty a notebook that runs on Mandriva. It's the only Linux/Unix OS that finds the wireless adapter (Atheros). It's actually one of the few Atheros drivers which does not have a Solaris driver. Is it possible to use this driver in Solaris. So I guess by recompiling the source code of t

Re: [osol-discuss] Network adapters

2008-04-15 Thread Emmanuel De Paepe
This makes it all clear. I hope to find some time to extract a new driver from the Windows driver. In the meantime I took the easiest solution, which costed me an extra 10 euro. Lucky it's just a network card and not a graphic adapter. This message posted from opensolaris.org __

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread Brandon High
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Runar Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MoBo: MicroATX, preferrably AM2+ and with 6 s-ata connectors and support of > at least 8GB RAM. > S-ATA controller: Something really cheap, most likely with a SiL3114 chip. Consider the Supermicro DAC-SATA-MV8 - 8 ports, a

Re: [osol-discuss] NAS - which OS version, and what hardware is supported?

2008-04-15 Thread RBell
Thanks for the reply, any help is welcome :) Your setup differs a little bit from mine, most significantly because you have a E-ATX motherboard with PCI-X, I want to use a microATX since they come with on-board vga, but they only have PCI and PCI-Express. I also would like to use a cheap s-ata

Re: [osol-discuss] Network adapters

2008-04-15 Thread Lurie
That's Attansic L1, it's not supported, see http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6580058 http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6677682 (I guess a dup of the previous bug) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___