> The irony of this thread when read in the context of
> understanding the code in build 81 is rather
> notable.
>
> Tim
Remind me again of what you are talking about
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
open
The irony of this thread when read in the context of understanding the code in
build 81 is rather notable.
Tim
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Sat, 29 Dec 2007, Steven Stallion wrote:
> Alan DuBoff wrote:
>> This is good to know. Although I haven't got a new system in quite some
>> time, and don't have any with Vista (most of my systems don't even have
>> windows on them;-). This could save me a lot of time/grief when I do run
>> acro
> - AT&T has allegedly let the federal government
> illegally tap their entire network, which amounts to
> just about all internet traffic flow in the USA.
The above is not related to OpenSolaris, so apart from what I am about to
write, expect no further comments.
AT&T is a slimy, vile company,
> Could this scenario with NSA also be valid with
> Solaris 10?
Fact: Solaris code is open source, those portions of Solaris which are open
source make any such "backdoor" detectable.
Fact: if NSA wanted backdoors, those would have to be implemented by Sun
Microsystems in their not yet open sou
> > > The SB1500 will definitely not function right
> now
> > > (pci-bridge not supported by sparcPci.c).
> > >
> >
> > Does the SB2500 have the same issue?
>
> Yes. So do the U25 and U45 and also T1000/T2000.
> A Blade 1000/2000, however, *is* known to work with
> the current Xorg's sparcPci.c
