[osol-discuss] Fwd: Added tag onnv_80 for changeset 7066e93e6b89

There is no dedicated ON list, so sending it to opensolaris-discuss. Am I the only one who feels uncomfortable when ONNV notification comes from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ? Nothing personal against the owner of that mail address. Just think that at this point there is no way for someone outside of Sun t

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

Try not to quote back the whole post next time... > So would this solution be compatible with the > existing Cisco solutions that many companies have? Nope, and I thought the protocol explanation would've made that point obvious. BTW, that complete incompatibility with anything else out there wa

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

> Hello! > > I don't read this alias normally, but I was pointed > to it by folks. I'm also using JIVE to read this one > instead of my normal e-mail. > > Punchin started its life as a test-tool for Solaris > IPsec and IKE during the S9 bringup of IKE(v1). > Punchin is different than other remot

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

He mentioned that the feature set would be significantly reduced since > OSS (when integrated) won't nearly provide as much capability as Alsa does on > Linux, but confirmed it does work fine on Solaris already. what capabilities from alsa are missing in oss? nacho ___

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

Victor wrote: > I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate PulseAudio as the sound > server in Solaris? > > I have been searching around forums and mailing lists and still didn't find > anything about this... but it's becoming kind of the standard in the big > linux distros (and GNOME)

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x "1 Gbe" eth SAN . Is it sensib

You could take a look at Sun Trunking 1.3, but Sun Trunking 1.3, like any server trunking software, load balances the outgoing traffic, not the incoming packets. Trunking 1.3 software relies on the link partner (switch or server) to load balance the incoming packets. 1. Download the binary. htt

Re: [osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79

Also awaiting 78 for a Wireless Network fix... :) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

Hello! I don't read this alias normally, but I was pointed to it by folks. I'm also using JIVE to read this one instead of my normal e-mail. Punchin started its life as a test-tool for Solaris IPsec and IKE during the S9 bringup of IKE(v1). Punchin is different than other remote-access soluti

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x "1 Gbe" eth SAN . Is it sensib

First of all Thanks to all, i am getting so much valuable Information here. secondly, as of now, I am thinking That on the transmittion end, where i am concerned with outbound load spreading, i will use IPMP group. Now as james said, i am thinking if there are three interfaces in the ipmp group,

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

John Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If something else can get the job done well, I'm not averse to using it. But > it appears at moment I have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. > Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco based VPN server > deployments that are already in

[osol-discuss] November 2007 OpenSolaris Community Newsletter

Here's the November issue of the OpenSolaris Community Newsletter: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/advocacy/newsletter/nov/ Thanks to all for your contributions. If you have any content you would like to submit for December's newsletter, please send them to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Linda b

Re: [osol-discuss] Cisco VPN Client for Solaris x86, anyone?

If something else can get the job done well, I'm not averse to using it. But it appears at moment I have no way to access or otherwise using punchin. Furthermore, does it work with the existing Cisco based VPN server deployments that are already in use in many of Sun's customers' shops? --I'm m

Re: [osol-discuss] Sound problems in SXCE77?

On 12/10/07, Patrick Ale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Patrick: > > > > > This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had > > to > > > rebuild anything. > > > [snip] > > Hi Brian :) > > And again, hi :P So, c

Re: [osol-discuss] Sound problems in SXCE77?

On 12/10/07, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Patrick: > > > This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had to > > rebuild anything. [snip] Hi Brian :) As far as I can tell I am using the same OSS modules 4.00, but I am not sure about the minor release version

Re: [osol-discuss] Sound problems in SXCE77?

Patrick: > This is a regression then, in my opinion. Prior to SXCE77 I never had to > rebuild anything. It should work fine without needing to rebuild anything. However, if you don't rebuild SUNWgnome-audio and SUNWgnome-media then you are using the SADA shim. This shim allows programs that us

Re: [osol-discuss] Sound problems in SXCE77?

On Dec 10, 2007 7:17 PM, Brian Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Patrick: > > Note that for GNOME/GStreamer to work best with OSS, you need to rebuild > the SUNWgnome-audio* and SUNWgnome-media* packages after installing the > OSS packages. To do this you should use the CBE, which you can get

Re: [osol-discuss] Sound problems in SXCE77?

Patrick: Note that for GNOME/GStreamer to work best with OSS, you need to rebuild the SUNWgnome-audio* and SUNWgnome-media* packages after installing the OSS packages. To do this you should use the CBE, which you can get from the OpenSolaris website: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/jds/con

Re: [osol-discuss] How to enable XDM?

Patrick Blaas wrote: > What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP > to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not > a fix, it's a workarround imho. > > This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions. > Anyone know what ch

[osol-discuss] Build 78 ,79

Anxiously awaiting build 79 to resolve my Gnome problems Any word on the delay of 78 and if it will delay 79? Thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

On Dec 10, 2007 10:26 AM, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Dec 10, 2007 3:55 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate > > > PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris? > > > I suggest to contact the developers of PulseAudio to ask

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

On Dec 10, 2007 3:55 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate > > PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris? > I suggest to contact the developers of PulseAudio to ask them if they > have any plans on porting this software to Solaris. That'

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

On Dec 10, 2007 5:55 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Likewise, perhaps you are asking at a wrong place. I suggest to contact the > developers of PulseAudio to ask them if they have any plans on porting this > software to Solaris. > > Perhaps you might be able to convince them that So

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

> I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate > PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris? > > I have been searching around forums and mailing lists > and still didn't find anything about this... but it's > becoming kind of the standard in the big linux > distros (and GNOME) and it might b

Re: [osol-discuss] Intel GB NICs (82573 PCI-E) not working

>"ifconfig -a plumb" is an intentional, though undocumented, special >case. Ordinarily, the "-a" option means "read SIOCGIFCONF to >determine what interfaces IP knows about, and operate on them." > The code to find all interfaces is as simple as: #include #include static int devfs_entry(di

Re: [osol-discuss] How to enable XDM?

> >>What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP >>to the dtlogin. Tha t > doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a > workarround imho. >> >>This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions. >>Anyone know what changed here? > >

Re: [osol-discuss] Intel GB NICs (82573 PCI-E) not working

UNIX admin wrote: > This is piece of cake stuff. Normally all of this is set up during > the install, if you chose not to do so, then it's all in all 45 > seconds to enter the interace names in /etc/hosts and create the > corresponding /etc/hosname.e1000g[0-n] files. You might be > experiencing a

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x "1 Gbe" eth SAN . Is it sensib

chandan maddanna writes: > Now as james said, i am thinking if there are three interfaces in the ipmp > group, i will use address on one and other two i will mark, 0.0.0.0 and make > them "up". So it does efficient outbound load spreading, in Round Robin > Type. Note that the load spreading is _cu

Re: [osol-discuss] Intel GB NICs (82573 PCI-E) not working

UNIX admin writes: > > Yes, I tried "ifconfig -a plumb". It didn't change > > anything; I still > > just see the two lo0 devices (IPv4 & IPv6) > > While Juergen migh be correct with `ifconfig -a`, this syntax is new and > unknown to me. As far as I know, "plumb" argument always needs a NIC instan

Re: [osol-discuss] How to enable XDM?

>What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP >to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a workarround imho. > >This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions. >Anyone know what changed here? Security, pr

Re: [osol-discuss] How to enable XDM?

What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP to the dtlogin. That doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a workarround imho. This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions. Anyone know what changed here? This message post

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x "1 Gbe" eth SAN . Is it sensib

Ceri Davies writes: > On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 11:53:27PM -0800, Chandan Maddanna wrote: > > Guys to be more clear, look at the diagram below, and tell me how to get a > > single load spread 2 Gbps link with IP Multi Pathing on Solaris 10 ? > > > > Note : Please see Image Below . > > > > > > ht

[osol-discuss] Unsubscribe

SABRI ALI MEDIAPOST SERVICES DSI - Ressources Administrateur système 9 boulevard du Général de GAULLE 92126 Montrouge CEDEX E.mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel : 0146124526 Fax : 0146124550 P Pensons ENVIRONNEMENT: n'imprimer que si nécessaire ...

Re: [osol-discuss] PulseAudio

> I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate > PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris? > > I have been searching around forums and mailing lists > and still didn't find anything about this... but it's > becoming kind of the standard in the big linux > distros (and GNOME) and it might b

[osol-discuss] PulseAudio

I have a question... Is there any plan to integrate PulseAudio as the sound server in Solaris? I have been searching around forums and mailing lists and still didn't find anything about this... but it's becoming kind of the standard in the big linux distros (and GNOME) and it might be useful fo

Re: [osol-discuss] Intel GB NICs (82573 PCI-E) not working

> Yes, I tried "ifconfig -a plumb". It didn't change > anything; I still > just see the two lo0 devices (IPv4 & IPv6) While Juergen migh be correct with `ifconfig -a`, this syntax is new and unknown to me. As far as I know, "plumb" argument always needs a NIC instance. So please try: ifconfig e

Re: [osol-discuss] OpenSolaris with iSCSI Luns and IPMP 3 x "1 Gbe" eth SAN . Is it sensible ?

> 1.) I am trying IPMP group for performance, > "Outbound" load spreading i am not worried of , as i > have myself seen it in action and is quite efficient, > But does Inbound Load Spreading work with IPMP and > will it have same effect. Unfortunately, no; IPMP can only do outbound load balancing;