On 11-Nov-07, at 1:59 PM, Brandorr wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2007 4:52 PM, Brandorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Nov 11, 2007 4:30 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM, UNIX admin
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is anyone other than myself interested in seei
>> D 1.564 07/09/20 11:57:19
>> backout 4046204/6603211: causes 6607084
>>
>> D 1.563 07/09/19 19:42:10
>> PSARC/2001/252 Recovering SCSI Sense Data
>> 4046204 USCSICMD fails to pass back more than 20 bytes ARQ Sense DATA;
>
> I would carefully check this diff.
Nope, it was backed out the next
OpenSolaris on Itanium2 might be an interesting
project to pursue.
Why not start on it and see where it leads??
~ Ken
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let me add a note: I now see the problem in the log that I did miss
a few hours ago.
>
> > It used to work in build 70.
>
> > Then somebody introduced a bug in the USCSI code from sd.c
>
> I prefer to say "a bug was introduced", subtler grammar with
> It used to work in build 70.
> Then somebody introduced a bug in the USCSI code from sd.c
I prefer to say "a bug was introduced", subtler grammar with a softer
attitude and leading to a more constructive discussion :) sd SCCS
history between build 70 and 76:
D 1.564 07/09/20 11:57:19
backo
On Nov 11, 2007 4:52 PM, Brandorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 11, 2007 4:30 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM, UNIX admin
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing
> > > an
> > > > > IA64/Itanium port
>
On Nov 11, 2007 4:30 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM, UNIX admin
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing
> > an
> > > > IA64/Itanium port
> > > > of OpenSolaris?
> > >
> > > Would that be cool? Why, yes it would!
> > who's running IA64? Only two firms, sgi and hp.
>
> And Bull, Fujitsu, Hitachi, NEC, UNISYS, and a gamut
> of small beige-
> box server vendors
Come on. That's such a small niche market. We're talking obscure here. I should
know, obscure hardware like that (for example the rx Integrity, and
> They have already actually, I'm not sure how much
> progress was made,
> but the project was scrapped. If Sun's willing to
> lawyer a little bit
> and see if it's legally possible for them to disclose
> the code, it may
> be a possibility...
It would be a possibility once OpenSolaris gains
> On Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM, UNIX admin
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing
> an
> > > IA64/Itanium port
> > > of OpenSolaris?
> >
> > Would that be cool? Why, yes it would!
> >
> > Would it be a justifiable return on investment? No.
> >
> > Here's the
On Nov 11, 2007 2:07 PM, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing an
> > IA64/Itanium port
> > of OpenSolaris?
>
> Would that be cool? Why, yes it would!
>
> Would it be a justifiable return on investment? No.
>
> Here's the deal:
>
> who's running
They have already actually, I'm not sure how much progress was made,
but the project was scrapped. If Sun's willing to lawyer a little bit
and see if it's legally possible for them to disclose the code, it may
be a possibility...
Sun types, likelyhood of this happening?
On 11-Nov-07, at 11:
Terry Heatlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It "rips" the CD in about one second, and the audio files are all empty.
Then somebody introduced a bug in the USCSI code from sd.c
This would not be the first time.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
I would be very surprised if Sun put any effort into porting Solaris to
Itanium. This doesn't prevent anyone else from trying though.
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolar
On 11-Nov-07, at 11:07 AM, UNIX admin wrote:
>> Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing an
>> IA64/Itanium port
>> of OpenSolaris?
>
> Would that be cool? Why, yes it would!
>
> Would it be a justifiable return on investment? No.
>
> Here's the deal:
>
> who's running IA64? Only two fir
> (It's one of several links I'd remove
> if I
> controlled the sidebar, along with the duplication of
> the
> "Portal" and "All Communities"/"All Projects" links.)
>
> --
> -Alan Coopersmith-
> - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System
> em Engineering
+1 to the p
> Is anyone other than myself interested in seeing an
> IA64/Itanium port
> of OpenSolaris?
Would that be cool? Why, yes it would!
Would it be a justifiable return on investment? No.
Here's the deal:
who's running IA64? Only two firms, sgi and hp.
hp's servers are WAY TOO EXPENSIVE to buy j
On Nov 11, 2007, at 7:09 PM, John Sonnenschein wrote:
> I suggested ski because it's free to download & redistribute
> whereas simics isn't.
That's actually the greatest disadvantage of Simics. Other than that,
it's just perfect.
The fact that students can get one-year license for free is not
On 11-Nov-07, at 4:31 AM, Jakub Jermar wrote:
>
> On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
>> This port may actually prove easier logistically than the PPC port,
>> as
>> there's already an accurate ia64 simulator ( it's called ski ) out
>> there, though it only runs on HPUX, Linux ( I
> We're so new to the reboot stuff...
The reliability of Solaris is great. We've got 2 Sun boxes at work, and the
only time we have to shut it down is when there is a power failure and the UPS
batteries are almost empty. Actually that's not quite true - the tape drive on
the E450 died so it had
andrewk9 wrote:
>> Actually, Nevada is the code name for the entirety of
>> the next version
>> of Solaris, including not just ON, but all the other
>> consolidations (X,
>> JDS, SFW, NWS, GAN, etc.) as well. ONNV is the code
>> name for ON for
>> Nevada.
>
> That's what I thought, but then I cl
> Actually, Nevada is the code name for the entirety of
> the next version
> of Solaris, including not just ON, but all the other
> consolidations (X,
> JDS, SFW, NWS, GAN, etc.) as well. ONNV is the code
> name for ON for
> Nevada.
That's what I thought, but then I clicked "Nevada Community" on
It "rips" the CD in about one second, and the audio files are all empty.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Terry Heatlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the advice, Joerg. I downloaded a later version, built and
> installed it, and it has
> the same, or a very similar issue. Output below...
I see no error. What problem do you have?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D
andrewk9 wrote:
> Nevada is the codename for the core of the next version of Sun Solaris (which
> *may* be called Solaris 11). It does not contain the whole system - only what
> Sun call the "operating system and networking" - see
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/ for more details. Nevad
Thanks for the advice, Joerg. I downloaded a later version, built and
installed it, and it has
the same, or a very similar issue. Output below...
--Terry.
# /opt/schily/bin/cdda2wav --version
cdda2wav 2.01.01a36 (i386-pc-solaris2.11) Copyright (C) 1993-2004 Heiko
Ei�feldt (C) 2004-2007 J�rg S
As far as I know, SXDE only has the developer tools on the DVD version. As far
as updating SXDE goes, it can update packages fine, but Sun doesn't provide
automated package updates for SXDE or SXCE.
Nevada is the codename for the core of the next version of Sun Solaris (which
*may* be called So
On Nov 11, 2007 4:52 AM, gohar khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi every one,
>
> i want to know can install other operating systems like windows server
> 2003,xp on sun hardware servers?? and can we install sun on other servers
> like DELL etc
a lot of sun's x86 hardware is certified to run wi
Terry Heatlie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just LUd to build 76 of Nevada, and now I don't seem to be able to rip
> audio CDs any more.
> I use a small wrapper round cdda2wav, and it seems to read the track
> information fine, but
> when it starts to try to extract the audio, it fails immediat
On Nov 11, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Milan Jurik wrote:
> This port may actually prove easier logistically than the PPC port, as
> there's already an accurate ia64 simulator ( it's called ski ) out
> there, though it only runs on HPUX, Linux ( I haven't tried it with
> brandZ ) & FreeBSD.
Well, ski has
Yes
You can install XP and Linux and other OS on Sun hardware. I have installed
Ubuntu on a Sun AMD Opteron system
You can also install Solaris/Open Solaris on non Sun hardware. I have installed
Open Solaris on Sony hardware.
Cheers,
Tirthankar
This message posted from opensolaris.org
gdm/xdmcp for b76 still doesn't work.
pardon me how to have ftp://ftp.the-nelsons.org/pub
package be added to b76?
Clarence CHU
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
32 matches
Mail list logo
