I tried again and this time it got worse--down to 20KB/s. I am giving up on
installing 10u4 for now.
BTW, SDM worked OK on my SuSE 10.2; it appeared that it is the nv_70 version of
SDM that's having problems.
(this message is cc'd to install >> discuss)
This message posted from opensolaris
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 22:24 -0400, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 18:50 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> >> >
> >> > FYI :
> >> >
> >> > I placed download links for easy access on the home
> >> > page at Blastwave.org
> >> > I'll probably place links for SXCE/SXDE there also
> >> >
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 18:50 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
>> >
>> > FYI :
>> >
>> > I placed download links for easy access on the home
>> > page at Blastwave.org
>> > I'll probably place links for SXCE/SXDE there also
>> > shortly.
>> > Dennis
>> >
>> >
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 18:50 -0700, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
> >
> > FYI :
> >
> > I placed download links for easy access on the home
> > page at Blastwave.org
> > I'll probably place links for SXCE/SXDE there also
> > shortly.
> > Dennis
> >
> > ___
>
>
> FYI :
>
> I placed download links for easy access on the home
> page at Blastwave.org
> I'll probably place links for SXCE/SXDE there also
> shortly.
> Dennis
>
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mailing list
> opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I am
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 13:46 -0700, Fintan Ryan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> This is great to see, I was playing with the binaries that were
> available from August 14th a few days ago in order a new iPod nano,
> one question though - is the code in the webrev substantially
> different from the code base
On 04/09/07, Sun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My notebook is Dell LATITUDE D630 and I tried to install Windows XP and
> Solaris 10 on it.
> I first install Windows XP, and all works well.
>
> Then I tried to install Solaris 10. After related drivers installed, both
> thenetwork and video now work
Hi Folks,
This is great to see, I was playing with the binaries that were available from
August 14th a few days ago in order a new iPod nano, one question though - is
the code in the webrev substantially different from the code base that the
binaries from Aug 14th were built from? If so would i
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 10:34 -0600, Mark J. Nelson
> wrote:
> > > I've actually received a reply back from the
> engineer resolving the
> > > problem, it seems that a performance tweak
> introduced in B72 has caused
> > > a problem with the detection of some cd/dvd
> drives. Hopefully B72 will
FYI :
I placed download links for easy access on the home page at Blastwave.org
I'll probably place links for SXCE/SXDE there also shortly.
Dennis
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Thats kind of stupid to release it knowing full well there is a royal
> cockup in the distribution which will cause issues.
Every development build has problems though, it is just part of development.
Developers don't care if a past development build had problems, because they're
already onto
Kaiwai Gardiner wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 10:34 -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
>>> I've actually received a reply back from the engineer resolving the
>>> problem, it seems that a performance tweak introduced in B72 has caused
>>> a problem with the detection of some cd/dvd drives. Hopefully B
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 10:34 -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote:
> > I've actually received a reply back from the engineer resolving the
> > problem, it seems that a performance tweak introduced in B72 has caused
> > a problem with the detection of some cd/dvd drives. Hopefully B72 will
> > either be re
> I've actually received a reply back from the engineer resolving the
> problem, it seems that a performance tweak introduced in B72 has caused
> a problem with the detection of some cd/dvd drives. Hopefully B72 will
> either be respun or it will appear in B73.
The concept of a "major release
Hi,
this is a heads-up of a significant codechange about to go into PCFS.
I've put a webrev for the proposed change up at:
http://cr.grommit.com/~frankho/
Why is this big / significant ?
a) it provides most of the support for media with 2kB sectorsize
(the infamous "my iPod isn't a
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 06:31 -0700, Sun wrote:
> My notebook is Dell LATITUDE D630 and I tried to install Windows XP
> and Solaris 10 on it.
> I first install Windows XP, and all works well.
>
> Then I tried to install Solaris 10. After related drivers installed,
> both thenetwork and video now wo
My notebook is Dell LATITUDE D630 and I tried to install Windows XP and Solaris
10 on it.
I first install Windows XP, and all works well.
Then I tried to install Solaris 10. After related drivers installed, both
thenetwork and video now works well.However, the sound card still not works.
Acco
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 10:37 +0300, Hang Loose wrote:
> Im new to Solaris so I cant really say how things would work.
> But would there be a way for (Open)Solaris have a module in the kernel
> to run Java in a native/faster/better way ?
> Would be better to build software with Java on the top of the
On Tue, 2007-09-04 at 01:19 -0700, Ché Kristo wrote:
> How many platforms have you tested this on? Just yours or others as well? Has
> anyone else experienced this issue?
>
>
> This message posted from opensolaris.org
> ___
> opensolaris-discuss mail
How many platforms have you tested this on? Just yours or others as well? Has
anyone else experienced this issue?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Satish
Spamming 5 community discussion groups is not going to encourage anyone to help
you, it will merely annoy people. Eric Raymond wrote a definitive guide to
asking smart questions which you should read before asking anyone to help you,
you can find it here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/sm
Im new to Solaris so I cant really say how things would work.
But would there be a way for (Open)Solaris have a module in the kernel to
run Java in a native/faster/better way ?
Would be better to build software with Java on the top of the existing
Solaris ? I think that if this could be done someho
22 matches
Mail list logo
