Hi Atul,
Being at the grub prompt you can make solaris partition active. or you
can try using fdisk or other tool that can help you do that and try
booting into solaris.
-Yousuf
Atul Vidwansa wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to dual boot thumper in Linux and Solaris. I have
installed Solaris on one
shay wrote:
Are you sure on the Fcode version, you were at 3.3.117 what version
are you >>trying to go to?
I am tring to load the FCode from "Not found fcode" to FCode version
1.16(isp2312.prom).
Also did you run the power off command and power back on the properly
for >>on power on reset, so
Hi,
I am trying to dual boot thumper in Linux and Solaris. I have
installed Solaris on one of the disks of thumper. The problem is, once
I boot the box in Linux, it refuses to go back to Solaris. Now on
Linux, I could identify the Solaris disk and fdisk shows me following:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]#
Thanks a ton! I have updated the blog to incorporate most of your
suggestions.
-Garima.
MC wrote:
The guide looks good, exactly what the community needs. The website folks will
love it I'm sure.
I'll ask questions and comment to help you improve it for newbies like myself:
1) Why are the s
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Oftentimes because an Express release has worked so stably that
we forget that it was only intended to be a beta.
It is probably time to define some terms, because we may be
talking at cross purposes.
In the "non-Solaris" world, Beta means something like
"The engine
Hi,
Sorry if this is to the wrong list.
I recently installed Open Solaris Nevada b55 on my home PC with Solaris
and Windows on separate disks. The solaris install worked well, however
I've not been able to boot into Windows Xp from Grub. Booting into
solaris works fine. The only way I can boot in
>>Are you sure on the Fcode version, you were at 3.3.117 what version are you
trying to go to?
I am tring to load the FCode from "Not found fcode" to FCode version
1.16(isp2312.prom).
>>Also did you run the power off command and power back on the properly for
on power on reset, so the f
On 5/2/07, Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps stating the obvious, but Ultra 5 can be had for $40 on ebay.
access to the Sparc[1] stack at Blastwave can be had for free to
community people.
Dennis
[1] from sun4m to sun4v
___
ope
I'm going to release this and let it stand as is. There are edits to
be done and people have requested other sections and other paths for
disk layout and SVM setup. I will work on those also but for now .. I
think this works.
just click on the link to document BLS-0061 here :
http://www.blas
Perhaps stating the obvious, but Ultra 5 can be had for $40 on ebay.
-Artem.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 5/2/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got a couple of sparcs (more actually, but two that run without
difficulty): a Sun Blade 2000
running 5.11 snv_41, and a Sun Blade 100 running 5.9 Generic_122300-04;
both have access to
Studio 10 and Studio 11, as well as full develo
I've got a couple of sparcs (more actually, but two that run without
difficulty): a Sun Blade 2000
running 5.11 snv_41, and a Sun Blade 100 running 5.9 Generic_122300-04; both
have access to
Studio 10 and Studio 11, as well as full development environments and a fair
bit of blastwave
stuff loade
> > First time I have learned that OpenSolaris is not
> interested in recruiting users.
>
> Because it's not true. The emphasis on developers
> is because users
> won't come without apps to run, so we need the
> developers first to
> make it more attractive to the users, but more users
> is def
Are you sure on the Fcode version, you were at 3.3.117 what version are you
trying to go to?
Also did you run the power off command and power back on the properly for on
power on reset, so the firmware loads into the HBA correctly, then you should
see a new firmware level with your fcinfo hba-p
On 5/2/07, Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jason" == Jason King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jason> Unfortunately, I don't have access to Sparc machines outside of
Jason> work, so sort of starting to manually assemble sparc instructions
Jason> and feed them to the code, I have no w
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
Am I alone in finding this scheme of naming convoluted? Can't this be made
simpler? Are there any plans to do so?
Many people find it convoluted and someday it should be fixed (or hope that
the PC industry catches up on EFI/GPT). Next time Frank
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:58:06AM -0700, shay wrote:
> Why I cannod download the FCode into the HBA QLA2342
> I must download the FCODE qlc23xxFcode1.16 in order to see the Luns from the
> PROM.
> why?
>
> NOTE : solaris10(11/06), server type V240.
>
>
> Some outputs :
>
>
> #>luxadm qlg
Am I alone in finding this scheme of naming convoluted? Can't this be
made simpler? Are there any plans to do so?
Many people find it convoluted and someday it should be fixed (or hope
that the PC industry catches up on EFI/GPT). Next time Frank Hofmann is
in the U.S., buy him a drink and he
> I have a prototype sparc disassembler I've put
> together available at
> http://www.madhack.com/~jason/dis_sparc.c
>
> There are still some things left to do (mostly
> implement support for most of the standard synthetic
> instructions), plus whatever shows up during
> testing.
>
> Unfortunatel
p1-p4 are primary partitions, p0:N are logical drives.
pcfs(7FS)
http://faq.solaris-x86.org/9.html#9.10
Am I alone in finding this scheme of naming convoluted? Can't this be
made simpler? Are there any plans to do so?
Today, Solaris can be installed only on a primary partition. Are there
pl
What is the proper command to show other fdisk partitions?
fdisk(1M)
Further, is there any way to show (& even mount) a "logical" (i.e., extended
fdisk) partition? One step back, how do I mount a primary fdisk partition?
p1-p4 are primary partitions, p0:N are logical drives.
pcfs(7FS)
h
Hi. I'm trying to run the smuser command on Solaris 11/06, and I keep
getting an error as follows.
-bash-3.00# /usr/sadm/bin/smuser list --
Authenticating as user: root
Type /? for help, pressing accepts the default denoted by [ ]
Please enter a string value for: password ::
Loading Tool: com.s
> What exactly you mean by "logical drive"? If you want
> to find disk
> drives and their partitions, use "format" command.
> -Atul
> --
> Atul Vidwansa
> Cluster File Systems Inc.
> http://www.clusterfs.com
>From my end, "format" only shows the slices in a Solaris partition. What is
>the prope
It's my fault...I was updating it and I hadn't got round to for a while.
I will try to fix that this week.
thanks for your patience!
Patrick
Doug Scott wrote:
Hey,
Just looking on the front page of the Open Solaris site showed the latest news is dated
"03/09/2007". Is this a case of there
Hey,
Just looking on the front page of the Open Solaris site showed the latest news
is dated "03/09/2007". Is this a case of there has been nothing happening in
the last month, or is it a case of "no news is good news"?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Hi folks,
I'd like to propose the creation of a new community and I came across
the short process description at http://opensolaris.org/os/communities
That process however does not seem to match the article VII of the
recently approved constitution. Which way should I go now? Follow the
proce
Hi Manoj,
Was this CentOS 3?
Yup. I used the tarball which is available from the OpenSolaris community.
I really want to get RHEL4 up and running on my solaris box, inside a
zone.
Has someone done that? Can anyone give me some pointers as to how to
do it?
I believe RHEL/CentOS 4,5 are no
The guide looks good, exactly what the community needs. The website folks will
love it I'm sure.
I'll ask questions and comment to help you improve it for newbies like myself:
1) Why are the slices 0, 1, 5, 7 instead of 0, 1, 2, 3?
2) What is the "Modify" column for? Can you add a "space" co
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
Hi all,
I got the CentOS zone up and running according to
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/brandz/install/;jsessionid=B42B3CCFBF1C07524131F9BFE73A0900
Was this CentOS 3?
I really want to get RHEL4 up and running on my solaris box, inside a zone.
Has someone
Why I cannod download the FCode into the HBA QLA2342
I must download the FCODE qlc23xxFcode1.16 in order to see the Luns from the
PROM.
why?
NOTE : solaris10(11/06), server type V240.
Some outputs :
#>luxadm qlgc_s_download
Found Path to 0 FC100/P, ISP2200, ISP23xx Devices
Complete
#>lu
Why I cannod download the FCode into the HBA QLA2342
I must download the FCODE qlc23xxFcode1.16 in order to see the Luns from the
PROM.
why?
NOTE : solaris10(11/06), server type V240.
Some outputs :
#>luxadm qlgc_s_download
Found Path to 0 FC100/P, ISP2200, ISP23xx Devices
Complete
#>lu
Lijo Lawrance wrote:
> how can i find the defined logical drives in solaris 10 os
>
>
Please don't post Solaris 10 questions to these lists, they are for
OpenSolaris topics.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.or
Hi all,
I got the CentOS zone up and running according to
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/brandz/install/;jsessionid=B42B3CCFBF1C07524131F9BFE73A0900
I really want to get RHEL4 up and running on my solaris box, inside a zone.
Has someone done that? Can anyone give me some pointers as to
Hi All,
I just published my first blog at http://blogs.sun.com/garima/. It had
started out
as an invitation for the community to take a look at NWAM (the project I'm
currently on), but ended up as some sort of a tutorial for an
OpenSolaris newbie.
I thought it might be useful for newcomers to
What exactly you mean by "logical drive"? If you want to find disk
drives and their partitions, use "format" command.
-Atul
On 5/2/07, Lijo Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
how can i find the defined logical drives in solaris 10 os
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
James C. McPherson wrote:
...
This url provides you with the necessary bits to pull down and
use with Azureus:
http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/index.cgi/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.solaris.x86/
Acutally, this url provides the bug report which is more useful:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi
UNIX admin wrote:
I use azureus on Solaris 10/x86 without a problem, haven't tried
one on nevada yet.
Nope, it doesn't work on Solaris for the i86pc platform. And it won't
'compile', either. So much for Java's "write once, run anywhere".
I'd sure like to know, those of you who got lucky and go
> I use azureus on Solaris 10/x86 without a problem,
> haven't tried one on nevada yet.
Nope, it doesn't work on Solaris for the i86pc platform. And it won't
'compile', either. So much for Java's "write once, run anywhere".
I'd sure like to know, those of you who got lucky and got it to run, how
how can i find the defined logical drives in solaris 10 os
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
39 matches
Mail list logo
