> I have Solaris 2.5.1 for x86 here but I don't know
> how that will help.
> There may be a binary in there that supports the old
> UNIX format ..
> r not.
I doubt it. They would have s5fs (of which I'm sure there were lots
of variations among manufacturers) with Sun slicing of the Solaris parti
On 5/1/07, Hugh McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If everm this was "s5fs", you may try ti find when it has been removed.
>
> that's it .. yep .. its long gone I think.
On 5/1/07, Hugh McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> If everm this was "s5fs", you may try ti find when it has been removed.
>
> that's it .. yep .. its long gone I think.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If everm this was "s5fs", you may try ti find when it has been removed.
that's it .. yep .. its long gone I think.
Might still be in Solaris 2.5.1 somewhere and I do have that
On 30/04/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MIDI was purposefully left out from the initial OSSv4
> release.
>
> http://4front-tech.com/hannublog/?p=6
Right. I didn't doubt that it was in the pipeline, but since
Murphy loves to mess up plans, I'll skip hoping or expecting
in f
On 4/30/07, John Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I
> have an old xenix drive that people want data off of
> and it won't boot anymore. I can't find a xenix
> install set anywhere so am looking for another os
> that will allow me to mount it.
--- Ivan Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Personally I don't see how a GPL'd OpenSolaris would
> do any better than current CDDL, not to mention
> possibility for various linux distribution to gain
> free and instant access to codes like dtrace and
> zfs.
GPL won't help Solaris too
Thanks, Cindi. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline to
get you set up
On Thu, 26 Apr 2007, cindi wrote:
The Project
This project proposes extensions to the fault management architecture (FMA)
to support a sensor abstraction layer for the collection and analysis of
sensor based telemetry
> MIDI was purposefully left out from the initial OSSv4
> release.
>
> http://4front-tech.com/hannublog/?p=6
Right. I didn't doubt that it was in the pipeline, but since
Murphy loves to mess up plans, I'll skip hoping or expecting
in favor of eventually having (or not).
I noticed on their site
> does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I
> have an old xenix drive that people want data off of
> and it won't boot anymore. I can't find a xenix
> install set anywhere so am looking for another os
> that will allow me to mount it. Linux won't do it as
> far as I can tell.
> thanx
I
On the old Solaris 9, the files that enabled the network was striate forward.
/etc/hostname.interfaceX in my case was hostname.bge0.
/etc/hostname.
/etc/hosts -> (linked to) /etc/inet/hosts
/etc/nodename
/etc/defaultrouter
/etc/netmasks
other wise this will work.
1. Check modinfo and make sure th
On 30/04/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi,
> I was looking for Opensolaris APIs equivalent to atomic_read() and
>atomic_set() found in Linux. The solaris' asm/atomic.h does not define
>such APIs. When I looked in the on-nv source, similar macros are
>defined in
http://cvs.
Greetings :
I would like to know what software applications and libraries from sun, i cant
use for building an opensolaris distribution.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.o
> hello
>
> I have V240 , solaris10, QLA2342(HBA), connected to
> AMS500(HDS storage).
> 1. why I cannot see the Luns on PROM?
> 2. how I descover luns on the PROM?
>
>
> --
> Details :
> --
> ok show-devs
> .
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1
> /[EMAIL PROTECTE
http://ftp.x.org/pub/X11R7.0/doc/html/xorg.conf.5.html
That was linked from here;
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/UserDocumentation
Click 7.0 then at the bottom, Section 5, Files and file formats.
More documentation is in the man pages for the individual driver
names (i.e. driver tunables)
--
Matt Sea
what exactly is Fcode?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I though that I am using qlc, because the model(modinfo) qlc in loaded when the
system is up.
and also I understand that Only when the HBA is using qlc , the MPxIO can work
other driver the MPxIO is not working.
And my my server the MPxIO is working OK.
so I this the cord use qlc.
?
This mes
how do I know what is my Fcode in the fiber channel HBA?
I HBA is a Qlogic HBA type QLA2342 dual, and I download and execute the
flash-install from the QLOGIC web site
http://support.qlogic.com/support/product_resources.asp?id=255
I download the flash file:
__Name : QLC FCode(QLA23xx)
_
I have B62 with a Dell Latitude Laptop, model D620
and can not seem to get the Broadcom Ethernet on board
interface to work.
What I have done...
[a] To get B62 to install I had to boot "disable-bge=true".
Once installed the drivers for bge show up under /dev/bge
but are inactive.
[b] I have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If those APIs do what their names suggests, what is the point
in having them?
"Atomic set" can hardly be anything other than a normal store
nor can "Atomic read" be much different from an ordinary read.
I'd find them useful.
For example, Studio 11 with -xarch=sparcv8
>Hi,
> I was looking for Opensolaris APIs equivalent to atomic_read() and
>atomic_set() found in Linux. The solaris' asm/atomic.h does not define
>such APIs. When I looked in the on-nv source, similar macros are
>defined in
>http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/comm
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:31:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Jim Bolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I have an old xenix
> > drive that people want data off of and it won't boot anymore. I can't find
> > a xenix install set anywhere so
On 4/30/07, Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> The docs.sun.com sites takes orders of magnitude longer to give me 18
>> hits. That is, at least, an improvement in content if not speed. The
>> docs.sun.com site is sooo slow that to open a give
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> The docs.sun.com sites takes orders of magnitude longer to give me 18
>> hits. That is, at least, an improvement in content if not speed. The
>> docs.sun.com site is sooo slow that to open a given page seems to take
>> 60 to 90 secs each. The only
On 4/30/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke writes:
> hmmm .. that may or may not suffice.
Probably not.
well .. its a good read late at night.
> In any case .. thanks for the manpage. I was hoping for an Sun
> Blueprint book on Xorg but I don't know if that exists yet
On 4/30/07, Atul Vidwansa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was looking for Opensolaris APIs equivalent to atomic_read() and
atomic_set() found in Linux. The solaris' asm/atomic.h does not define
such APIs. When I looked in the on-nv source, similar macros are
defined in
http://cvs.opensolaris
Dennis Clarke wrote:
The docs.sun.com sites takes orders of magnitude longer to give me 18
hits. That is, at least, an improvement in content if not speed. The
docs.sun.com site is sooo slow that to open a given page seems to take
60 to 90 secs each. The only hits found were for things like rel
Hi,
I was looking for Opensolaris APIs equivalent to atomic_read() and
atomic_set() found in Linux. The solaris' asm/atomic.h does not define
such APIs. When I looked in the on-nv source, similar macros are
defined in
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/io/d
Dennis Clarke writes:
> hmmm .. that may or may not suffice.
Probably not.
> In any case .. thanks for the manpage. I was hoping for an Sun
> Blueprint book on Xorg but I don't know if that exists yet. :-\
The goal of the Xorg guys is to make hand-hacking of xorg.conf
completely unnecessary. I
On 4/30/07, James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dennis Clarke writes:
> On 4/30/07, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's always xorg.conf(4) :)
>
> bash-3.2$ uname -a
> SunOS login 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine
> bash-3.2$ man -s 4 xorg.conf
> N
On 30/04/07, Ken Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4. Professional grade MIDI support is suggested.
Intentionally left out of OSSv4 initially, 4Front says they will be
adding it later.
For people in the RME products (i.e. http://www.rme-audio.com) like the
Hammerfall DSP 9632 soundcard then we
On 29/04/07, Ignacio Marambio Catán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OSS is in the pipeline and should be in Nevada sometime soon. GStreamer
> currently only supports SunAudio, but should also support OSS when it
> becomes available in Nevada.
>
what do you mean? nevada might ship this:
http://www
On 30/04/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > OSS is in the pipeline and should be in Nevada
> sometime soon. GStreamer
> > currently only supports SunAudio, but should also
> support OSS when it
> > becomes available in Nevada.
> >
> what do you mean? nevada might ship thi
Dennis Clarke writes:
> On 4/30/07, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There's always xorg.conf(4) :)
>
> bash-3.2$ uname -a
> SunOS login 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine
> bash-3.2$ man -s 4 xorg.conf
> No entry for xorg.conf in section(s) 4 of the manual.
>
On 4/30/07, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There's always xorg.conf(4) :)
bash-3.2$ uname -a
SunOS login 5.10 Generic_118833-36 sun4u sparc SUNW,UltraSPARC-IIi-cEngine
bash-3.2$ man -s 4 xorg.conf
No entry for xorg.conf in section(s) 4 of the manual.
bash-3.2$ man xorg.conf
No manual en
On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that the ability was still in there. Somewhere. Perhaps in
> /usr/ucb somewhere ?
If everm this was "s5fs", you may try ti find when it has been removed.
that's it .. yep .. its lon
Chris Steinke - hello,
this is Lisa McMahon with P&L Strategies. I've been looking for you. If
possible could you email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] My client that you
interviewed with is looking for you and I don't have a current number.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Chris Steinke - hello,
this is Lisa McMahon with P&L Strategies. I've been looking for you. If
possible could you email me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] My client that you
interviewed with is looking for you and I don't have a current number.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
There's always xorg.conf(4) :)
Dennis Clarke wrote:
I have been looking at http://x.org/ and there is a wiki but no link
that says documentation. The current release 7.2.0 says that no
documentation exists because of bugs :
Documentation
Due to bugs in the documentation toolchain, documenta
I have been looking at http://x.org/ and there is a wiki but no link
that says documentation. The current release 7.2.0 says that no
documentation exists because of bugs :
Documentation
Due to bugs in the documentation toolchain, documentation for
this release is not available online at the
"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought that the ability was still in there. Somewhere. Perhaps in
> /usr/ucb somewhere ?
If everm this was "s5fs", you may try ti find when it has been removed.
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL
Some support for Xenix was in Solaris years ago in early 2.x releases.
That support eroded over time, and the last vestiges of it were removed
about three years ago.
Bonnie
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Bolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> do
"Brian Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am pretty sure OpenSolaris does not support xenix filesystems, nor am I
> aware of any plans to do so. Your best bet is to contact SCO, and see if
> their OpenServer can do what you need. (They bought Xenix from Microsoft)
Openserver did support it but
Artem Kachitchkine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How about we open license-discuss and direct all such discussions there.
>
> -Artem.
>
> P.S. And when it's abandoned 5 years from now, we give it to the
> creative kids, and they'd use it for a super-trendy underground club
> named like "The Sew
Hi
just found portable libupnp project.
maybe this will open doors to build upnp servers to (open)solaris too.
project url: http://pupnp.sourceforge.net/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discus
On 4/30/07, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jim Bolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I have an old xenix drive
that people want data off of and it won't boot anymore. I can't find a xenix
install set anywhere so am looking for anothe
Jim Bolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I have an old xenix drive
> that people want data off of and it won't boot anymore. I can't find a xenix
> install set anywhere so am looking for another os that will allow me to mount
> it. Linux won't d
Artem Kachitchkine writes:
>
> How about we open license-discuss and direct all such discussions there.
If they don't notice that we beat the subject soundly with a stick
just a short while ago, what's to say they'll all direct their
discussions to license-discuss?
-1 on the proposal, just becau
I am pretty sure OpenSolaris does not support xenix filesystems, nor am I
aware of any plans to do so. Your best bet is to contact SCO, and see if
their OpenServer can do what you need. (They bought Xenix from Microsoft)
-Brian
On 4/30/07, Jim Bolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
does opensolaris
How about we open license-discuss and direct all such discussions there.
-Artem.
P.S. And when it's abandoned 5 years from now, we give it to the
creative kids, and they'd use it for a super-trendy underground club
named like "The Sewer", playing robo-electronica and projecting the
works of
N, O, O, 4 stop Acknowledge receipt of of message at 1440 hours stop User
pkasper digest set to plain stop No further Information Reporting is necessary
stop Addressed to user pkasper and repeated for information of OpenSolaris
discuss stop Message ends.
This message posted from opensol
does opensolaris allow a xenix drive to be mounted? I have an old xenix drive
that people want data off of and it won't boot anymore. I can't find a xenix
install set anywhere so am looking for another os that will allow me to mount
it. Linux won't do it as far as I can tell.
thanx
This mess
Ivan Wang wrote:
I don't have any power over what license Sun will distribute future OpenSolaris with, but to anyone who has a say on the matter, I hope they all give a real serious think before deciding to go with GPL.
I don't think anything has changed really since the thousand e-mail
discuss
set authenticate puokeg
set digest plain
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi all,
Personally I don't see how a GPL'd OpenSolaris would do any better than current
CDDL, not to mention possibility for various linux distribution to gain free
and instant access to codes like dtrace and zfs.
Two years ago, going GPL might help Solaris then to pick up drivers written for
After reading this article through, I came to the conclusion that either the
writer has no clue, or just needed to get another story out to be paid. Maybe
it is both! The article suffers from poor analysis and bad research.
Doug
>
> Heads up:
>
> http://www.businessweek.com/technology/conten
Ginn Chen Wrote:
>Thanks for making the explanation.
>My understanding is Xvideo can sve us time for YUV to RGB converting.
>Currently, by using SSE2, YUV converting is taking < 3% CPU time for video
>playback on Solaris >x86.
>So I guess XVideo can't be a magic bullet here.
>Meanwhile, Flash vi
I commented out the exit statement in the luupgrade script ,
-bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS scribble 5.11 snv_62 sun4u sparc sun4u
one other thing i noticed the luactivate script did not seem to set the
correct boot device , upon setting this manually B62 booted as expected
Thanks for your help J
Heads up:
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/apr2007/tc20070430_095211.htm
Al Hopper Logical Approach Inc, Plano, TX. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Voice: 972.379.2133 Fax: 972.379.2134 Timezone: US CDT
OpenSolaris.Org Community Advisory Board (CAB) Member - Apr 2005
OpenSolaris Go
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is it possible to avoid this?
The list should just be made inactive until the next elections
and the current members removed from it.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
_
Ken Mays wrote:
Just an update:
1. snv_62 (5.11) has X11 7.0.2 (latest: v7.2).
No, snv_58 and later have X11R7.2 - there is no such thing
as X11R7.0.2.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
__
Jürgen Keil wrote:
xvideo used to work much better on older versions of xorg with my radeon 7000
card
(I don't know what has changed recently to make it slow down so dramatically);
Somewhere between snv_55b and snv_60 (snv_58?) linker options in the Xorg
build have changed, which did break th
Just an update:
1. snv_62 (5.11) has X11 7.0.2 (latest: v7.2).
2. Commercial version of OSS 4.0 has professional sound card support.
3. GStreamer 0.10.12 is preferred for testing purposes.
4. Professional grade MIDI support is suggested.
For people in the RME products (i.e. http://www.rme-audio.co
> xvideo used to work much better on older versions of xorg with my radeon 7000
> card
> (I don't know what has changed recently to make it slow down so dramatically);
Somewhere between snv_55b and snv_60 (snv_58?) linker options in the Xorg
build have changed, which did break the Xv extension f
Hi shay,
Suncluster is not opensourced, so you better ask your local
support to forward this query to Suncluster group. I will try to
answer as much I can.
1. Once you carve out luns out of your new storage and expose them to
Suncluster nodes, either run "devfsadm" followed by "scdidadm -r" or
Cyril Plisko wrote:
On 4/30/07, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
shay wrote:
> format (the lun is):
> 4. c3t50060E801022CFD0d0
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0
Are you sure that this is attached with qlc? It
looks to me as
Is it possible to avoid this?
Jörg
--
EMail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED](uni)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
On 4/30/07, James C. McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
shay wrote:
> format (the lun is):
> 4. c3t50060E801022CFD0d0
> /[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED],0/[EMAIL
PROTECTED],0
Are you sure that this is attached with qlc? It
looks to me as if it's really attach
shay wrote:
hello
I have V240 , solaris10, QLA2342(HBA), connected to AMS500(HDS storage).
1. why I cannot see the Luns on PROM?
2. how I descover luns on the PROM?
--
Details :
--
ok show-devs
.
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL
shay wrote:
> hello
>
> I have V240 , solaris10, QLA2342(HBA), connected to AMS500(HDS storage).
>
Please use another support channel for Solaris 10 issues, these lists
are for OpensSolaris topics.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-
shay,
[I think storage-discuss mailing list is more appropriate for this
sort of questions.]
On 4/30/07, shay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hello
I have V240 , solaris10, QLA2342(HBA), connected to AMS500(HDS storage).
1. why I cannot see the Luns on PROM?
2. how I descover luns on the PROM?
hello
I have V240 , solaris10, QLA2342(HBA), connected to AMS500(HDS storage).
1. why I cannot see the Luns on PROM?
2. how I descover luns on the PROM?
--
Details :
--
ok show-devs
.
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED],1
/[EMAIL PROTECTED],70/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
..
> >
> > OSS is in the pipeline and should be in Nevada
> sometime soon. GStreamer
> > currently only supports SunAudio, but should also
> support OSS when it
> > becomes available in Nevada.
> >
> what do you mean? nevada might ship this:
> http://www.4front-tech.com/solaris.html?
If so, it sure
73 matches
Mail list logo
