Sodant wrote:
>I just installed Solaris 10 11/06 and the Mozilla browser can't resolve names
>to IP addresses.
>I've created an /etc/resolv.conf file and made it world-readable, and can do
>nslookups on hostnames just >fine, but the browser can't resolve them.
>I'm new to Solaris--how do I fix t
I just installed Solaris 10 11/06 and the Mozilla browser can't resolve names
to IP addresses.
I've created an /etc/resolv.conf file and made it world-readable, and can do
nslookups on hostnames just fine, but the browser can't resolve them.
I'm new to Solaris--how do I fix this?
This messa
I used LiveUpgrade (lucreate \ luupgrade\luactivate) in order to upgrade from
solaris 10(3.05+resent recommanded pathed) to solaris 10(11.06).
the upgrade finished succesfully, but then I check zfs commands like :
zpool, zfs the upgrade installed only the simbolik links /use/sbin/zpool but
not th
I have 2 local disks and 2 luns(mpxio device files) - solaris 10(3/05)
I want to create striping with the 2 luns using svm.
is it ok to create metadb on the local disks only, and then just add the 2 luns
into a strip of svn(without a metaset)?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
> First of all, thank you very much for the feedback,
> though it's negative ;)
>
> I extract some of you questions, and followed my
> replies.
>
> > However, after an in-depth research into the
> Chinese-specific
> ocalization infrastructure, he convinced us to at
> least temporarily
> switch
Hi!
A new set of tarballs containing an OS/Net version of ksh93 [1] (based
on ksh93s+_beta_20070418 [2]) is now available from
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/ksh93-integration/downloads/2007-04-19/
These tarballs are intended to be installed over an existing OpenSolaris
i386 or SPAR
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
>Anyway, GCC does use different include files for stl than Sun Studio uses
>and it is more than just creating a possibility to have compatible libs
>in theory.
>
>
>
Both CC and gcc can use STLport.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss
Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The new Mx000 series appear to be using the Fujitsu M64 processors.
> >
>
> The M series I'm logged into right now reports
> "Sun Microsystems sun4u Sun SPARC Enterprise M8000 Server"
> and is running nightly as of a few days ago... it looks like
>
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>>What we can do for the problem?
>>>
>>>-Use as many pure C ABIs as possible
>>>
>>>-Create something like /usr/lib/gcc/
>>> to document the fact that the libraries inside are not compatible
>>> with the Sun c
Stefan Teleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 April 2007 11:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > In the Solaris STL lib, std::string.clear() and std::string.erase()
> > do the same: delete on the allocated space.
> >
> > In the GCC STL lib, std::string.clear() only resets pointers and
> > k
Roland Mainz wrote:
Hi!
Is it possible that bugs.opensolaris.org is loosing bugs (again) ?
I am missing two bug reports:
1. "usr/src/cmd/perl/ build installs Subversion directories (.svn) in
the proto area" (note that this is not the exact title). That one was
filed seveal days
> I really don't get why you think OpenSolaris (esp. as in Solaris Express,
as opposed to regular Solaris (currently 10)) should have any particular
gee-whiz-updates-are-painless tools.
Thank heavens you aren't in charge of Solaris :)
Solaris only needs to improve if Sun wants to stay competitive
[from install-discuss]
Recently I tried to install S10U3 inside vmware on a 500GB disk but ran into a
"small" problem: the disk partitioning using by Solaris (fdisk) does not seem
able to deal with large disks as presented by VMWare. To test whether or not it
was a vmware vs solaris bug, I tried
Bart Smaalders wrote:
(snip...)
> Chris Steinke wrote:
>
>
>>
>> I'd be curious to hear about experiences with it.
Mainly because
I've
>> heard that Fujitsu systems had some compatibility
issues with
Solaris
>> Express and you needed to use Fujitsu's version of
Solaris.
>
> This may have been
Bart Smaalders wrote:
(snip...)
Chris Steinke wrote:
I'd be curious to hear about experiences with it. Mainly because I've
heard that Fujitsu systems had some compatibility issues with Solaris
Express and you needed to use Fujitsu's version of Solaris.
This may have been true (I don't kn
Cheers Steve, that's great. Thanks.
On 20/04/07, Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Dick,
Sorry about that... I'm not sure why that didn't get pushed out.
I've just put the changelog up, you should be able to view it now.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:29:51AM +0100, Dick Davies wr
So what is the thrust of OpenSolaris if it is *not* at least partially
to gain a share of the desktop market among technophobes, regardless of
their age/gender? Why all the emphasis on JDS and Gnome? For serious
commerce or business on big machines who needs or even wants a browser
client or
Chris Steinke wrote:
Anyone here from Sun have Solaris Express working on the new Mx000 series systems yet?
Yes. Putbacks go into Solaris Nevada first; support for these machines
started being added around build 38, about this time last year.
I'd be curious to hear about experiences with it
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Horvath,
Friday, April 20, 2007, 6:32:21 AM, you wrote:
H> Is there a new option in b62 so I can install zfs from the scratch
H> installation. I've seen somewhere it was "promised". Is there a
H> change log or what's new for every new build? Please give a link.
H>
Manish Chakravarty wrote:
How stable is b62 compared to SXDE?
SXDE is "simply" b55-b with additional condiments,
so I'm assuming your question is really along the
lines of "how do b55-b and b62 compare"? And "Which
one will crash less often?" (If you were instead
just trying to identify the di
Hi All,
Pardon me if you find this question stupid. I am a linux user. I
installed SXDE and frankly love it.
I am using it as my primary OS on my home pc.
I find it stable enough for my needs.
How stable is b62 compared to SXDE?
I am trying to build KDE for BeleniX. Is it a good enough platform
Hi Dick,
Sorry about that... I'm not sure why that didn't get pushed out.
I've just put the changelog up, you should be able to view it now.
cheers,
steve
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 07:29:51AM +0100, Dick Davies wrote:
> Thanks Derek - anyone know where the changelog
> that would usually liv
On Friday 20 April 2007 11:19, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> In the Solaris STL lib, std::string.clear() and std::string.erase()
> do the same: delete on the allocated space.
>
> In the GCC STL lib, std::string.clear() only resets pointers and
> keeps the allocated memory while std::string.erase() dele
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What we can do for the problem?
> >
> >-Use as many pure C ABIs as possible
> >
> >-Create something like /usr/lib/gcc/
> > to document the fact that the libraries inside are not compatible
> > with the Sun compiler C++ ABI
> >
> >
> >
>
Hello Horvath,
Friday, April 20, 2007, 6:32:21 AM, you wrote:
H> Is there a new option in b62 so I can install zfs from the scratch
H> installation. I've seen somewhere it was "promised". Is there a
H> change log or what's new for every new build? Please give a link.
H>
Right now on x86/x64 you
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 06:13:16PM -0500, Shawn Walker wrote:
> On 19/04/07, Ceri Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, and I don't have a problem with that. However, I will also
> > grant an irrevocable license to everyone who "receives" my contribution
> > to do whatever they like with it
Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote:
For encrypted NFS, the clean thing to do is configure
IPSec between two hosts, not tunnel over SSH.
Tunneling NFS over SSH would be a kludge in this
case.
Plus, IPSec covers all TCP/IP traffic, not just NFS,
so that's an added bonus.
true, but how do you do that betw
Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
LingBo Tang wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
[...]
- What about adding an option ("on" by default) to
use the first line of
the virtual console to hold the "window title" ?
This idea is quite interesting. But what will be
displayed in that
position? I'm afraid there is
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Does this mean that the Sun backend will understand the intermediate code
> >from GCC or that the Studio compilers will implement a gcc compatible
> >frontend?
> >
> >
> >
> I don't know. I guess the end result (CC generating code that can be
> linked
We are going to request for the second round review by PSARC in
next month.
The exact build number may be known after that if the architecture
looks good from PSARC viewpoints.
Manoj Joseph wrote:
LingBo Tang wrote:
So far, we have no backport plan for S10.
Would this be making its way into
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>>-Use as many pure C ABIs as possible
>>>
>>>-Create something like /usr/lib/gcc/
>>> to document the fact that the libraries inside are not compatible
>>> with the Sun compiler C++ ABI
>>>
>>>
>>The Studi
I've checked the behaviour on s10u4_05 and have filed a bug "6548326
texttools from /usr/bin cannot work correctly in UTF-8 locales". The
behaviour is still the same.
Alexander Kuzmin
James Carlson napsal(a):
Alexander Kuzmin writes:
Because int this case it would be probably closed as a d
Alan DuBoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if it would be possible to have an ABI translation layer in the
> system which corrected gcc ABIs so they didn't blow chunks?
Was't there a hack on the GCC frontend from Sun that caused GCC to simply
emit C code that is understood by cc?
Jörg
-
Ian Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >-Use as many pure C ABIs as possible
> >
> >-Create something like /usr/lib/gcc/
> > to document the fact that the libraries inside are not compatible
> > with the Sun compiler C++ ABI
> >
> >
> >
> The Studio team are working on gcc ABI
I really don't get why you think OpenSolaris (esp. as in Solaris Express,
as opposed to regular Solaris (currently 10)) should have any particular
gee-whiz-updates-are-painless tools. Solaris Express is _not_ really
meant for production (or for anybody's technophobe grandmother, either),
it's very
35 matches
Mail list logo
