Hi!
I have a problem using ldap authentication with opensolaris (I try Nextenta
alpha release 6 and Solaris Express ). I'm using
an openldap in a linux box and use:
$ ldapclient init "IP of my server"
This command works perfect but the issue is that anyone can login in the
computer with any accou
Im trying to compile the NDIS Wrapper in 64 bits, provided in:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/laptop/wireless/ndis/
i did everything described on that tutorial, but i have a problem whit this
instruction:
modload ndisapi
"can't load module: Invalid argument"
I really don't k
Forgot to mention
there are x86 and SPARC versions
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
There is a beta of Flash Player 9 for Solaris at Adobe Labs
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer9/
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> On Thursday 15 March 2007 08:43 pm, John Weekley
> wrote:
> > Tough group to find, but hopefully worthwhile.
> > Can I join in?
>
> Please do!
>
> We can use a voice like yours around here!
Be careful what you ask for, Al. You just might get it!
Yes I have a big mouth, it needs to be to fit my
Thought I'd post this here because this recently posted slide
desk seems too useful to risk it slipping by unnoticed... So
if you believe a picture is worth 1024 words, this slide deck
is worth fetching, if for no other reason than to study the
three block diagrams. (It was for me, that's for sure
> I think the project is trying to navigate from a "share nothing
> publically" position (that might be, say, conceived by a lawyer) to
> an "open development" position. So you are seeing an attempt to
> interpret legal restrictions.
Yes. :)
> It might be more helpful if there was more
* Glynn Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-15 15:41]:
> Hi Sherry,
>
> Sherry Moore wrote:
> > The Intel Project is now live at
> >
> > http://opensolaris.org/os/project/intel-platform
> >
> > It is a collaboration site for enhancing Solaris performance on Intel
> > platforms, enabling
Thanks, Joachim. You have seconds. I'll contact you offline
to get you set up.
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Joachim Worringen wrote:
Networkers,
Solaris currently lacks an interface to add custom implementations of
socket address families, types and protocols to the kernel without
modifying the kernel
> "Jörg" == Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jörg> Well, I did send the list to opensolaris-discuss and to Mike
Jörg> Kupfer (don't know his Borg name;-) on November 14th 2005.
*Bzzz* *whrrr*
Resistance is voltage over current!
Knowledge is power!
The air speed of a laden swal
girish writes:
> > getting duplicate hits from /onnv/, /netvirt/, /clearview/, etc.
>
> Whats /netvirt and /clearview? They always pop-up in the code search results.
> Just curious.
One quick google search later ...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/crossbow/CrossbowBeta/
http://www.open
> getting duplicate hits from /onnv/, /netvirt/, /clearview/, etc.
Whats /netvirt and /clearview? They always pop-up in the code search results.
Just curious.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-d
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> > Moderated write access, yes, but moderated read access doesn't feel
> > very open to me.
>
> Absolutely. Maybe I'm confused, I thought read access wasn't an issue...
I wouldn't be so quick to rule out confusion on my part. :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA,
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Rich Teer wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
I'm not sure I agree. I think under the right circumstances, a project
should be allowed to moderate "write-access" to their *-dev list.
Moderated write access, yes, but moderated read access doesn't feel
very op
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Eric Boutilier wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree. I think under the right circumstances, a project
> should be allowed to moderate "write-access" to their *-dev list.
Moderated write access, yes, but moderated read access doesn't feel
very open to me. Transparancy is the keyword
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, James C. McPherson wrote:
... can we have a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
list as well, and leave the list(s) hosted at opensolaris.org
as fully open?
I'm not sure I agree. I think under the right circumstances, a project
should be allowed to moderate "write-access" to their *
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
doesn't the opengrok search still pick up all the project workspaces ?
And even when we did have it pickup project workspaces, it only
indexed ones that allowed anonymous pulls/clones.
"When we did"? It still is, making it
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
doesn't the opengrok search still pick up all the project workspaces ?
And even when we did have it pickup project workspaces, it only indexed
ones that allowed anonymous pulls/clones.
"When we did"? It still is, making it still very annoying to u
This month's FROSUG (Front Range OpenSolaris User Group) meeting is on
Thursday, March 29, 2007. Our presentation is on "Sharemgr" by
Doug McCallum. In addition, we will be giving an OpenSolaris Update,
and will be having an InstallFest. So, if you want help installing
an OpenSolaris distribution,
> I disagree, put both Mysql and Postgres connectors
> in the package.
Actually, that's a pretty good idea.
Put both in, so those projects that explicitly depend on MySQL have "backward
compatibility" and others are free to use PostgreSQL as the backend for future
development.
This message p
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Re the hg repo, could we have named pull rather than a blanket
"you must be blessed" restriction?
Why is anonymous pull not allowed ? This to me seems very wrong, you
aren't hiding the code that away
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Re the hg repo, could we have named pull rather than a blanket
"you must be blessed" restriction?
Why is anonymous pull not allowed ? This to me seems very wrong, you
aren't hiding the code that away anyway since it is stil
Darren J Moffat wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Re the hg repo, could we have named pull rather than a blanket
"you must be blessed" restriction?
Why is anonymous pull not allowed ? This to me seems very wrong, you
aren't hiding the code that away anyway since it is still available by
othe
> After you applied the binary Nvidia driver, can you use [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In my case, the card is Nvidia 6100 and after I installed version 1.0-9755, I
> can only work in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mode.
Could be the same problem that I had with a GeForce 6150, connected
to a Iiyama AU4831D flat pa
> > i think it has something to do with the move to
> > modular Xorg, but i've been trying to run mplayer
> on
> > both snv_59 (clean install from sxde DVD) and
> > opensolaris_b60 (bfu'd from 59). that package
> always
> > worked fine on 57. i can start gmplayer and it
> works
> > until i try and
Amey Abhyankar writes:
> Microsoft's term and conditions are pretty straight forward. Buy
> licensed product of Microsoft. Thats it .
You're kidding, right? Have you ever read the miles of legalese that
comes (not for free, I imagine) with every single Microsoft product?
Have you ever tried to
From Sun:
Use and develop of Solaris 10 is free unless you need support
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/support.jsp
-Ghhe
Amey Abhyankar wrote:
Free << What comes in your mind when your hear this word ? Probably to get something without spending anything. Well IBM,Sun and all competit
Free << What comes in your mind when your hear this word ? Probably to
get something without spending anything. Well IBM,Sun and all competitor's are
throwing this word across the globe. IBM already announced they are looking
forward in to the new era of Open Source..Is that a way to make
James C. McPherson wrote:
Re the hg repo, could we have named pull rather than a blanket
"you must be blessed" restriction?
Why is anonymous pull not allowed ? This to me seems very wrong, you
aren't hiding the code that away anyway since it is still available by
other means.
--
Darren J M
> > i think it has something to do with the move to
> > modular Xorg, but i've been trying to run mplayer
> on
> > both snv_59 (clean install from sxde DVD) and
> > opensolaris_b60 (bfu'd from 59). that package
> always
> > worked fine on 57. i can start gmplayer and it
> works
> > until i try and
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 01:30:59AM -0700, UNIX admin wrote:
> ditch the MySQL DB as fast as possible and replace it with PostgreSQL.
> MySQL DB is an extremely shoddy product, besides, PostgreSQL is much easier
> to deploy and use.
PostgreSQL is included in standard distribution and I am sure Sun
> > Project Proposal: Next Generation Web Stack
> >
> > Summary
> >
> > We would like to create an OpenSolaris project to
> > assume and enhance
> > the community and work originally created in Sun's
> > CoolStack project
> > as part of the CoolTools project. This project
> will
> > assume all o
> Project Proposal: Next Generation Web Stack
>
> Summary
>
> We would like to create an OpenSolaris project to
> assume and enhance
> the community and work originally created in Sun's
> CoolStack project
> as part of the CoolTools project. This project will
> assume all of
> the CoolStack comp
> i think it has something to do with the move to
> modular Xorg, but i've been trying to run mplayer on
> both snv_59 (clean install from sxde DVD) and
> opensolaris_b60 (bfu'd from 59). that package always
> worked fine on 57. i can start gmplayer and it works
> until i try and play a movie-- i
34 matches
Mail list logo
