Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>It's a Java Web Start application. Sounds like the right MIME types aren't
>>set
>>up on your system/browser, since it should start the 'javaws' application
>>with
>>that jnlp file.
>>
>>
>
>help about reports :
>
>Welcome to Mozilla 1.7 for Sun Java™ Desktop System
Dennis Clarke wrote:
...
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html
I looked at the XML file that I downloaded and then used wget to fetch the
jar file and unzipped it :
Did you read the faq for that tool?
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html#jnlp
answers yo
Can't recommend docs.sun.com highly enough - very good quality documentation
(choose the 'solaris 10' collection - everything under there still
applies to SXCR).
And make use of the man pages too - in my experience Linux
manpages vary greatly in quality. The solaris ones are excellent.
On 19/02/
>
> --- Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> OKay .. so I see all the class files there and will now figure out
>> how to
>> run this bloody thing. Looks like some sort of Java "run once
>> debug
>> everywhere" sort of scenario thus far.
>>
>> Dennis
>
> Thanks for taking the time and ma
>
>
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>>> http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hcl/hcts/device_detect.html
>>>
>>
>> looks interesting .. what I got was a file that had this in it :
>>
>>
>
>> http://java.sun.com/";>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm not really sure what to do with that ...
>
> It's a Java Web Start applicat
--- Dennis Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OKay .. so I see all the class files there and will now figure out
> how to
> run this bloody thing. Looks like some sort of Java "run once
> debug
> everywhere" sort of scenario thus far.
>
> Dennis
Thanks for taking the time and making the effor
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] which open solaris for a total newbie
From:"Dennis Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:Mon, February 19, 2007 01:25
To: "Glynn Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: opensolaris-discus
> Hi,
>
> James C. McPherson wrote:
>> Welcome to the community!
>>
>> Seconding Eric's suggestion, I'd add that you should go
>> and look at the hardware compatibility list at
>>
>> http://sun.com/bigadmin
>>
>> Note that if your hardware is listed as working with
>> Solaris 10 then it's pretty c
I think we can close this thread off with the following
carton - seen today at http://xkcd.com/c225.html
http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/open_source.png";>
James C. McPherson
--
Solaris kernel software engineer
Sun Microsystems
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
Brad,
thank you so much for the detailed response..actually since I was using fedora
I don't know apt I know rpm/yum (well kinda)
NexentaOS' package system behaves almost exactly like Debian's and Ubuntu's:
"Create, Remove, Update Delete":
apt-get install [the package]
apt-get remove [
brad kelley wrote:
thank you so much for the detailed response..actually since I was using
fedora I don't know apt I know rpm/yum (well kinda) so I wonder if I
should just go to the developer version first..I know the basics of
starting stopping services tcpip and some simple networking services
thank you so much for the detailed response..actually since I was using fedora
I don't know apt I know rpm/yum (well kinda) so I wonder if I should just go to
the developer version first..I know the basics of starting stopping services
tcpip and some simple networking services (samba dns apache)
Hi,
James C. McPherson wrote:
> Welcome to the community!
>
> Seconding Eric's suggestion, I'd add that you should go
> and look at the hardware compatibility list at
>
> http://sun.com/bigadmin
>
> Note that if your hardware is listed as working with
> Solaris 10 then it's pretty certain to wo
what rock have I been under...since when is solaris free? thanks for the info,
I think I will try the developer version...
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Eric Enright wrote:
On 2/18/07, brad kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok I have some linux experience (not much) and wanted to learn solaris
on my own time without dishing out to sun to do so. I can across this
page...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/#use
and see all these choices.
Brad,
Ok I have some linux experience (not much) and wanted to learn solaris on my
own time without dishing out to sun to do so. I can across this page...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/#use
and see all these choices. I'd love some opinions on which one you think is the
closest to
I have good news then!
Solaris 10 is not a "pay for" OS. So you can go to:
http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/get.jsp
Download it, install it, and use it for free*!
(*you just need to register to obtain a free license entitlement, you will also
only receive security, driver, and a few other u
On 2/18/07, brad kelley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ok I have some linux experience (not much) and wanted to learn solaris on my
own time without dishing out to sun to do so. I can across this page...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/#use
and see all these choices. I'd love some opinions
Ok I have some linux experience (not much) and wanted to learn solaris on my
own time without dishing out to sun to do so. I can across this page...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/#use
and see all these choices. I'd love some opinions on which one you think is the
closest to the pay fo
Roland Mainz wrote:
>Hi!
>
>
>
>Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
>it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
>subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued for
>moderation by the list admins automaticall
> Few examples:
> Linux+Gnome is much faster than Solaris+JDS on the
> same AMD hardware.
> JDS+Solaris needs more memory than Linux+Gnome (same
> hardware). 512MB
> are enough for Linux, Solaris starts swapping after a
> few hours of
> usage and doesn't stop until swap is full. JDS
> doesn't grok
> On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
>
>>> It's a hardware problem. Your IT department didn't
>>> by Ultrasparc laptops.
>>
>> Hehe!
>> You mean, those underpowered, *expensive* laptops that you can only get
>> from two or three manufacturers, and which are so expensive, they don't
>> even d
Hi!
Is there a way to prevent things like the posting below ? For example is
it possibe to reconfigure Jive to allow postings only for people who are
subscribed to that list or make sure that such postings are queued for
moderation by the list admins automatically ?
Original Messa
Hye all.
I have to get Dtrace Logs (on Solaris 10) to import them into MOM database
(operations manager on Win Server 2003)
For that I suppose it is necessary to use a Web Service (via JBoss) to get
Dtrace informations and export them.
But I don't see any logs concerning Dtrace on Solaris. I
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, UNIX admin wrote:
It's a hardware problem. Your IT department didn't
by Ultrasparc laptops.
Hehe!
You mean, those underpowered, *expensive* laptops that you can only get from
two or three manufacturers, and which are so expensive, they don't even dare
list the price on
I'm got an annoying problem trying to install Solaris onto a 160GB hard disk.
For some reason Solaris appears to be limited to seeing the first 8GB of the
disk during the early stages of booting. After that it seems that it can access
the whole disk OK.
The BIOS is an Award BIOS, and the disk i
On 2/5/07, Laszlo (Laca) Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Another library from the GNOME community is libxml2, which is
now used all over Solaris. I'm currently working on updating
it in Solaris 10 to a version that is 2 years newer. The diff
is 10+ lines (not counting the Makefile changes
>> > It's a hardware problem. Your IT department
>> didn't
>> > by Ultrasparc laptops.
>>
>> Hehe!
>> You mean, those underpowered, *expensive* laptops
>> that you can only get from two or three
>> manufacturers, and which are so expensive, they don't
>> even dare list the price on their web sit
Andrew Pattison wrote:
>Is it possible to dual boot an Ultra 10 between Solaris 9 and the latest
>version of SXCE (whatever that might be at the time)? I reckon I can manually
>dual boot by setting up nvaliases for my 2 hard disks and typing either "boot
>disk1" or "boot disk2" at startup, but
[b]International Industrial Limited is a professional supplier of mobile phones
and their peripheral accessories. Through tremendous effort and extensive
experience, our company expanded into the international distribution ma …
wehave all brands of Mobile Phones,Ipods,xbox 360, Sidekicks,Nextels
Hi,
I am working on solaris 10 and my first question is that when I open a udp
socket in family AF_INET6, I can see two entries for that port in "netstat -an"
one in UDP IPv4 section and another on UDP IPv6 section while on AIX I see only
one entry. Is it that solaris opens two sockets ???
> > It's a hardware problem. Your IT department
> didn't
> > by Ultrasparc laptops.
>
> Hehe!
> You mean, those underpowered, *expensive* laptops
> that you can only get from two or three
> manufacturers, and which are so expensive, they don't
> even dare list the price on their web sites openl
Is it possible to dual boot an Ultra 10 between Solaris 9 and the latest
version of SXCE (whatever that might be at the time)? I reckon I can manually
dual boot by setting up nvaliases for my 2 hard disks and typing either "boot
disk1" or "boot disk2" at startup, but if it were possible to use s
The wording on the last question on that FAQ is misleading. It implies that
VMWare will now run on a Solaris host OS, when what it actually means is that a
Solaris VM image is available that will let you run it on Windows, Linux or
MacOS inside a VMWare VM.
Cheers
Andrew.
This message post
Looks like the answer is here:
http://developers.sun.com/solaris/downloads/solexpdev/product_faq.html
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Must have missed a memo/announcement somewhere...just noticed this:
Is this just a transition period between SX:DE (02/07...b55) and SXCR (b57)?
Is SX:DE (02/07) intended to be a stable version with fewer releases, while
SXCR is updated/released more frequently to test emerging features?
This
> It's a hardware problem. Your IT department didn't
> by Ultrasparc laptops.
Hehe!
You mean, those underpowered, *expensive* laptops that you can only get from
two or three manufacturers, and which are so expensive, they don't even dare
list the price on their web sites openly, and one has t
> On a personal workstation, you would expect
> pkgadd
> stall things in (say) /usr/bin where you can use them
> directly in your PATH.
This will work for Sun and Sun packages, but will actually break for any third
party packages, for example when trying to install them in a sparse zone
> Bill Moffitt wrote:
>
> >
> >So, there's only one question left: what's going to
> make those five people sitting around in somebody's
> garage look around and, instead of coming to the
> conclusion that they need a Windows server, come to
> the obvious and irrefutable conclusion that they need
> 2. Both packages install to exactly the same location
> and deliver the same files, only one contains i386,
> one has SPARC.
That's not a problem, nor is it an error.
> OK, so are package writers meant to put files for
> different architectures into separate directories?
You could, but you sho
> I respectfully disagree (IRD). I am building a
> cluster to support high-performance computing,
> specifically meteorological models. The current
> version of the code runs on UltraSparc-III non-copper
> based system. The Sun sales rep loaned us an x4200
> and I borrowed times on a SunFire V490
41 matches
Mail list logo
